F5, Inc. (FFIV)
POSITIVEFundamental
73
Price
$384.26
Market Cap
$21.78B
Part 1 · What the company is worth
Overview
F5 makes the software and hardware that sit between a company's applications and the internet, deciding how traffic is routed, balanced across servers and inspected for attacks. Its core product, BIG-IP, began as a physical box installed in corporate data centres and has been rebuilt into software that also runs in public clouds. Customers are mostly large enterprises, banks, telecoms and government agencies that cannot afford their applications going down.
How it makes money
Revenue splits across three lines: software (increasingly sold as term-based subscriptions rather than one-time licenses), systems (the physical BIG-IP appliances), and global services (support contracts and professional services tied to the installed base). Because the installed base is large and support renewals are recurring, roughly half of revenue comes from services rather than new sales, giving the business a steady, annuity-like component alongside lumpier hardware and software orders.
Revenue by segment
Support contracts and professional services tied to F5's installed base of software and hardware already deployed at customers.
BIG-IP and related application security and delivery software, sold mostly as term subscriptions across data centre and cloud deployments.
The physical BIG-IP appliances that customers install in their own data centres, the company's original product line.
Competitive moat
Switching costs · NarrowBIG-IP is wired into the core of a customer's network, handling traffic for critical applications; ripping it out means re-architecting how traffic reaches those applications, which enterprises avoid unless forced. That stickiness is being tested by cloud-native alternatives built into AWS, Azure and by rivals like Cloudflare and Akamai, which is why the advantage looks narrow rather than dominant today.
What drives demand
Moderately cyclicalDemand tracks enterprise IT infrastructure budgets, which enterprises can delay but rarely cut to zero because the applications F5 protects keep running regardless of the economic cycle. Large deals bunch around refresh cycles and cloud migration projects, so quarterly revenue can be lumpy even though the underlying need for application delivery and security is fairly stable.
Key risks
- Nation-state breach of internal systems — F5 disclosed in October 2025 that a sophisticated nation-state actor had persistent, long-term access to its internal systems and exfiltrated files including BIG-IP source code, a serious blow to trust for a company whose entire business is securing other people's networks.
- Distributor concentration — Two distributors accounted for a third of fiscal 2025 revenue; losing or straining either relationship would disrupt a large share of order flow with little notice.
- Single contract manufacturer — F5 relies on Flex Ltd. to manufacture its hardware appliances; a disruption at that single supplier would directly limit how many systems F5 can ship.
- Competition from cloud-native and cloud-scale rivals — Akamai, Cloudflare, Cisco and the built-in traffic management tools of the major cloud providers all compete for the same application delivery and security spend, pressuring pricing and share.
- Execution risk in the shift to subscriptions and SaaS — F5 is moving customers from perpetual hardware and licenses toward recurring software and cloud offerings; a slower-than-planned transition would show up as weaker growth even as the underlying business stays healthy.
Customer concentration
Top customers account for 33.3% of revenue
Two distribution partners together generated 33.3% of fiscal 2025 revenue. This is channel concentration rather than end-customer concentration, but it still means F5's near-term order flow depends heavily on the health of a couple of distributors.
The case for
Buyers argue that F5's systems revenue swung back to strong growth in fiscal 2025, that its installed base keeps renewing high-margin services almost regardless of the broader IT cycle, and that the shift toward software subscriptions should raise the quality and predictability of earnings over time.
The case against
Sellers worry that the October 2025 breach will slow sales cycles as customers reassess their trust in F5's security, that two distributors control an outsized share of revenue, and that cloud-native alternatives keep chipping away at the case for a dedicated on-premises appliance.
Written by the editors, published on August 18, 2026
Direct competitors
Who this company fights with for the same customers
No editorial profile for this company yet
No competitor list for this company yet.
Balance Sheet & Liquidity
Revenue
$3.31B
Trailing 12 months (through 6/30/2026)
Net Income
$727M
Trailing 12 months (through 6/30/2026)
Free Cash Flow
$906M
Total Equity
$3.59B
Total Liabilities
$2.73B
Current Ratio
1.66
Interest Coverage
-
Debt/EBITDA
0.29
Earnings Per Share
Revenue & Net Income
Free Cash Flow
Income Breakdown
Historical statement
Margins over time
Debt over time
How heavy the debt is
Growth grid
Growth — Revenue
Fair Value Estimation
Fair Value
$391.77
Current Price
$384.26
Margin of Safety
+1.9%
Fair Value Range
$267.13 - $516.40
Estimation Methods
Valuation Metrics
P/E Ratio
30.20
ROE
19.3%
P/B Ratio
5.57
P/FCF
22.14
Gross Margin
81.9%
ROIC
12.7%
Profitability Radar
Value Creation (Economic Moat)
ROIC
12.7%
WACC
10.1%
ROIC − WACC
+2.6 pp
ROIC exceeds the cost of capital — the company is creating value for shareholders.
Fundamental Analysis Criteria
Passed (21)
- EPS shows upward trend
- EPS CAGR 16.42%
- Price CAGR 10.27%
- ROIC 12.7%
- Gross Margin 81.9%
- P/FCF 22.14
- Debt/Equity ratio
- Operating Margin 24.5%
- Positive Free Cash Flow
- CapEx intensity
- Current Ratio
- Debt/EBITDA
- Return on Tangible Assets
- ROE 19.9%
- Revenue Growth 5Y 5.6%
- Analyst Consensus 55% Buy
- Earnings Surprise avg 13.6%
- PEG Ratio 1.73
- Earnings Quality (OCF/NI) 1.44
- Share Dilution -1.1%
- Piotroski F-Score 8/9
Failed (5)
- P/B Ratio 5.57
- Low reliance on intangibles
- Price below Graham Number
- DCF valuation (Overvalued)
- Net Margin Trend 22.0% vs 22.1%
Unavailable (2)
- Dividend Payout NaN%
- Interest Coverage
Piotroski F-Score
Strong financial health
Earnings Quality
High quality: earnings backed by cash
Share Dilution
Buying back shares. Shareholder friendly
Governance
Executive Team
| Name | Title | Age |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Francois Locoh-Donou | President, CEO & Chairman | 54 |
| Mr. Edward Cooper Werner | Executive VP & Chief Financial Officer | 50 |
| Dr. Thomas Dean Fountain Ph.D. | Executive VP & COO | 48 |
| Mr. John Maddison | Executive VP & Chief Marketing Officer | 61 |
| Mr. Chad Michael Whalen Esq. | Executive VP & Chief Revenue Officer | 53 |
| Mr. Michael F. Montoya | Executive VP & Chief Technology Operations Officer | 53 |
| Ms. Suzanne DuLong | Vice President of Investor Relations | - |
| Ms. Angelique M. Okeke | Executive VP, General Counsel & Secretary | 49 |
| Mr. Rob Gruening | Director of Corporate Communications | - |
| Ms. Cathy Peterman | Executive VP & Chief People Officer | - |
Audit Risk
4
Board Risk
5
Compensation Risk
7
Shareholder Rights Risk
4
Part 2 · The price and when to enter
This part won't tell you whether the company is worth owning: it helps you choose when to buy it, once the fundamentals have convinced you. Inside: technical analysis, potential, historical drawdowns, gamma exposure.
Latest News
Recent headlines for FFIV, sourced from Markets Gazette.