Back to rankings

Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR)

Fair Value
TechnologySemiconductorsUnited States

Fundamental

68

Price

$1140.12

Market Cap

$59.51B

Part 1 · What the company is worth

Overview

Monolithic Power Systems designs power-management chips: the small components that convert and regulate electricity inside servers, cars, phones and industrial equipment. Like NVIDIA, it is fabless — it designs the chips and has outside foundries manufacture them — so its edge comes from engineering rather than factories. What began as a supplier of chips for laptop and monitor power circuits now sells increasingly into AI data-center power delivery, the fastest-growing part of its business.

How it makes money

Revenue comes from selling chips to equipment makers, either directly or through distributors, recognized when the customer takes delivery — there are no subscriptions. Because MPS designs rather than manufactures, and its chips replace several older components with one, it can charge a premium over commodity power parts while keeping costs mostly to research and foundry capacity. The heaviest growth driver is the amount of power-delivery silicon each AI server rack now requires, far higher than in a conventional server.

Revenue by segment

Storage and Computing26.3%

Power chips for memory, storage drives, notebooks and graphics cards — the largest end market.

Enterprise Data25.2%

Power-delivery chips sold directly into AI servers and data-center racks — the segment tied most closely to AI infrastructure spending.

Automotive21.2%

Power management for infotainment, lighting and driver-assistance systems sold to carmakers and their suppliers.

Communications11.1%

Power solutions for optical modules, routers and networking equipment used to build communications infrastructure.

Consumer9.1%

Chips used in televisions, home appliances and other consumer electronics.

Industrial7.1%

Power components sold into industrial and instrumentation equipment, the smallest end market.

Competitive moat

Switching costs · Narrow

Once an engineer designs an MPS chip into a car, server or phone, replacing it means re-qualifying a new part through months of testing — a cost few customers take on for a component that is a small fraction of the total bill of materials. That gives MPS pricing power on existing designs, but it must still win the next design cycle against larger rivals like Texas Instruments and Analog Devices from scratch.

What drives demand

Cyclical

Demand mixes a cyclical core — automotive, industrial and consumer electronics production rise and fall with the broader economy — with a newer, even more concentrated driver: how much AI server capacity a handful of hyperscalers decide to build. That second driver has been the main source of recent growth, which makes results more dependent on a few large customers' capital budgets than the older, more diversified business was.

Key risks

  • Concentration in a few AI infrastructure customers — Growth in the largest and fastest-growing segment depends on continued capital spending by a small number of very large data-center operators, whose plans can change without warning.
  • Design-win competition from larger rivals — Texas Instruments, Analog Devices and other larger analog chipmakers compete for the same design sockets, and losing a design cycle can mean years without that customer's business.
  • Dependence on outside foundries — MPS owns no fabrication plants and relies on contract manufacturers for wafers and packaging, so capacity shortages or supplier disruption limit how much it can ship.
  • Cyclical end markets — Automotive, industrial and consumer electronics production all slow in a weaker economy, and inventory corrections at customers have caused sharp swings in orders before.

Customer concentration

MPS does not disclose individual customer names or percentages, but the Enterprise Data segment — its fastest-growing — is concentrated around a small number of AI computing customers, making that growth more fragile than the automotive or industrial businesses.

The case for

Buyers argue that each new generation of AI servers needs more power-delivery silicon than the last, that MPS's design-win model locks in revenue once a chip is chosen, and that Storage/Computing and Enterprise Data growth show the company capturing a disproportionate share of that buildout.

The case against

Sellers fear that the AI-driven growth rests on a handful of customers who could qualify a competing chip or slow their own capital spending, that automotive and industrial end markets remain cyclical, and that larger rivals with deeper resources will eventually contest the design wins MPS has won.

Written by the editors, published on August 18, 2026

Direct competitors

Who this company fights with for the same customers

Compare

Generated with artificial intelligence on September 19, 2026, shared with all users

P/E: 43.3Score: 76Market cap: $252.49B

The largest supplier of analog power-management chips, competing with Monolithic Power for the same DC/DC converter and voltage-regulator sockets in industrial, automotive, computing and consumer boards.

P/E: 46.4Score: 77Market cap: $191.62B

Through its Linear Technology and Maxim power lines it sells high-performance regulators and power modules to the same industrial, automotive and data-centre customers Monolithic Power targets.

P/E: 68.0Score: 57Market cap: $68.22B

Competes head-on in power conversion for automotive and for AI-server power delivery, the fastest-growing part of Monolithic Power's business.

P/E: 47.8Score: 66Market cap: $28.04B

Sells power-conversion and motor-drive silicon into the same automotive and industrial customers, competing for the same design wins as Monolithic Power.

P/E: 104.4Score: 62Market cap: $2.70B

A pure-play in highly integrated power-conversion ICs, overlapping directly with Monolithic Power in AC/DC and DC/DC supplies for appliances, industrial and consumer equipment.

Renesas Electronics Corporation (ルネサスエレクトロニクス株式会社)6723

Its Intersil-derived power-management portfolio bids for the same multiphase controllers and point-of-load regulators in computing, communications and automotive designs.

Balance Sheet & Liquidity

Revenue

$3.27B

Trailing 12 months (through 6/30/2026)

Net Income

$802M

Trailing 12 months (through 6/30/2026)

Free Cash Flow

$666M

Total Equity

$3.53B

Total Liabilities

$663M

Current Ratio

4.98

Interest Coverage

-

Debt/EBITDA

0.02

Earnings Per Share

Revenue & Net Income

Free Cash Flow

Income Breakdown

Historical statement

Margins over time

Debt over time

How heavy the debt is

Growth grid

Growth — Revenue

Fair Value Estimation

General caseFairly Valued

Fair Value

$1105.70

Current Price

$1140.12

Margin of Safety

-3.1%

Fair Value Range

$718.71 - $1492.70

Spread across the valuation methods used, not a statistically calibrated confidence interval.

Estimation Methods

Analyst price target:$1839.80
Discounted cash flow (DCF):$461.06
Earnings multiple (P/E):$689.42
Graham growth formula:$846.33
Earnings power value (EPV):$107.34
Justified P/B:$129.41
Dividend discount (Gordon):$61.09
P/FFO, funds from operations:$219.44
Mid-cycle earnings:$245.74
Revenue multiple:$358.25
Last Earnings Surprise:+8.63%

Valuation Metrics

P/E Ratio

69.60

ROE

17.6%

P/B Ratio

14.38

P/FCF

95.69

Gross Margin

55.2%

ROIC

17.7%

Profitability Radar

Value Creation (Economic Moat)

ROIC

17.7%

WACC

14.0%

ROIC − WACC

+3.7 pp

ROIC exceeds the cost of capital — the company is creating value for shareholders.

Fundamental Analysis Criteria

Passed (18)

  • EPS shows upward trend
  • EPS CAGR 21.91%
  • Price CAGR 32.40%
  • ROIC 17.7%
  • Gross margin 55.2%
  • Debt/equity ratio
  • Operating margin 28.7%
  • Positive free cash flow
  • Current ratio
  • Debt/EBITDA
  • Return on tangible assets
  • Low reliance on intangibles
  • ROE 21.9%
  • Revenue growth 5Y 27.0%
  • Earnings surprise, average 2.5%
  • Earnings quality (operating cash flow / net income) 1.03
  • Share dilution -1.0%
  • Piotroski F-Score 7/9

Failed (7)

  • P/FCF 95.69
  • P/B ratio 14.38
  • CapEx intensity
  • Price below Graham Number
  • DCF valuation (Overvalued)
  • PEG ratio 2.49
  • Net margin trend 24.5% vs 65.6%

Unavailable (2)

  • Dividend payout –
  • Interest coverage

Piotroski F-Score

7/9

Strong financial health

ROA > 0
Operating cash flow > 0
ΔROA > 0
Cash flow > net income
Leverage ↓
Current ratio ↑
No dilution
Gross margin ↑
Asset turnover ↑

Earnings Quality

1.03

High quality: earnings backed by cash

Share Dilution

-1.0%

Buying back shares. Shareholder friendly

Institutional Holdings

Governance

Executive Team

NameTitleAge
Mr. Michael R. HsingFounder, Chairman, President & CEO65
Mr. Deming XiaoExecutive Vice President of Global Operations62
Ms. Saria TsengEVP of Strategic Corporate Development, General Counsel & Corporate Secretary54
Mr. Maurice SciammasExecutive Vice President of Worldwide Sales & Marketing65
Mr. Robert W. Dean IIInterim Chief Financial Officer60
Ms. Genevieve CunninghamSenior Manager of Marketing Communications-
Mr. Tony BalowVice President of Finance-
Arthur LeeFinance Manager-

Audit Risk

10

Board Risk

8

Compensation Risk

4

Shareholder Rights Risk

9

Documents

  • Annual Report (10-K)

    A yearly overview of the business, its financial results, and the risks it faces.

    Filed on 2026-02-27

    View document
  • Quarterly Report (10-Q)

    A snapshot of financial performance for the most recent three-month period.

    Filed on 2026-08-05

    View document
  • Current Report (8-K)

    An announcement of a major event, such as a leadership change or big news.

    Filed on 2026-09-10

    View document

via SEC EDGAR

Income History

via SEC EDGAR

Part 2 · The price and its context

This part shows how the price has behaved, not whether the company is worth owning. Inside: technical analysis, potential, historical drawdowns, gamma exposure.

Market Reaction Profile

How much MPWR moves, measured on its daily prices.

VolatilityHigh

More volatile than 84% of the tracked stocks (90-day volatility).

Volatility 30d
60.9%
Volatility 90d
58.1%
Beta vs S&P 500 (1y)
2.56Correlation 0.60
Max drawdown (12m)
-32.5%
ATR (14d, % of price)
5.34%

Earnings reactions

How MPWR moved around its past quarterly results.

Next earnings release

Oct 29, 2026 · In 5 days · After the close

EPS estimate: 7.75Revenue estimate: $1.2B

What usually happens

  • Over the last 12 releases the stock moved a median of 8.7% the next day, up or down.
  • Next-day moves: up 9, down 3 (out of 12).

Release history

DateWhen EPS est.EPS actualSurprise Gap 1 day5 days
Jul 30, 2026After the close5.986.50+8.6% +13.9% +8.3% +3.3%
Apr 30, 2026After the close4.995.10+2.1% -3.1% -1.9% -2.4%
Feb 5, 2026After the close4.824.79-0.6% +8.1% +6.4% 0.0%
Oct 30, 2025After the close4.734.730.0% -6.2% -7.6% -11.9%
Jul 31, 2025After the closen/an/an/a+4.0% +10.5% +12.2%
May 1, 2025After the closen/an/an/a+2.2% +5.9% +6.4%
Feb 6, 2025After the closen/an/an/a+3.9% +9.0% +5.9%
Oct 30, 2024After the closen/an/an/a-10.2% -17.5% -14.6%
Aug 1, 2024After the closen/an/an/a+0.5% +1.4% +7.5%
May 1, 2024After the closen/an/an/a+4.4% +9.2% +9.3%
Feb 7, 2024After the closen/an/an/a+5.4% +14.2% +15.5%
Oct 30, 2023After the closen/an/an/a+5.3% +9.3% +22.2%

Release dates from SEC 8-K filings.

Updated 10/24/2026

Historical statistics for educational purposes only. They are not forecasts and not investment advice.

Price reaction to the news

Latest news on MPWR and what the price did next.

Return of the stock minus return of SPY over the same days. A news item close to a price move did not necessarily cause it. Historical data for educational purposes only, not investment advice.

Latest News

Recent headlines for MPWR.

  • 6/15/2026POSITIVE
    Here's How Much $1000 Invested In Monolithic Power Systems 5 Years Ago Would Be Worth Today

    An investment of $1000 in Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) five years ago would have grown to approximately $4,790 today, representing a significant return of 379%. This performance outpaces the broader market and highlights the company's strong growth trajectory and investor appeal. MPWR's consistent revenue increases and expanding market share in the power management semiconductor sector have been key drivers. Investors considering the stock should note its historical performance as an indicator of potential future gains, though past results do not guarantee future outcomes.