Back to rankings

Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR)

POSITIVE
TechnologySemiconductorsUnited States

Fundamental

68

Price

$1302.88

Market Cap

$63.15B

Part 1 · What the company is worth

Overview

Monolithic Power Systems designs power-management chips: the small components that convert and regulate electricity inside servers, cars, phones and industrial equipment. Like NVIDIA, it is fabless — it designs the chips and has outside foundries manufacture them — so its edge comes from engineering rather than factories. What began as a supplier of chips for laptop and monitor power circuits now sells increasingly into AI data-center power delivery, the fastest-growing part of its business.

How it makes money

Revenue comes from selling chips to equipment makers, either directly or through distributors, recognized when the customer takes delivery — there are no subscriptions. Because MPS designs rather than manufactures, and its chips replace several older components with one, it can charge a premium over commodity power parts while keeping costs mostly to research and foundry capacity. The heaviest growth driver is the amount of power-delivery silicon each AI server rack now requires, far higher than in a conventional server.

Revenue by segment

Storage and Computing26.3%

Power chips for memory, storage drives, notebooks and graphics cards — the largest end market.

Enterprise Data25.2%

Power-delivery chips sold directly into AI servers and data-center racks — the segment tied most closely to AI infrastructure spending.

Automotive21.2%

Power management for infotainment, lighting and driver-assistance systems sold to carmakers and their suppliers.

Communications11.1%

Power solutions for optical modules, routers and networking equipment used to build communications infrastructure.

Consumer9.1%

Chips used in televisions, home appliances and other consumer electronics.

Industrial7.1%

Power components sold into industrial and instrumentation equipment, the smallest end market.

Competitive moat

Switching costs · Narrow

Once an engineer designs an MPS chip into a car, server or phone, replacing it means re-qualifying a new part through months of testing — a cost few customers take on for a component that is a small fraction of the total bill of materials. That gives MPS pricing power on existing designs, but it must still win the next design cycle against larger rivals like Texas Instruments and Analog Devices from scratch.

What drives demand

Cyclical

Demand mixes a cyclical core — automotive, industrial and consumer electronics production rise and fall with the broader economy — with a newer, even more concentrated driver: how much AI server capacity a handful of hyperscalers decide to build. That second driver has been the main source of recent growth, which makes results more dependent on a few large customers' capital budgets than the older, more diversified business was.

Key risks

  • Concentration in a few AI infrastructure customers — Growth in the largest and fastest-growing segment depends on continued capital spending by a small number of very large data-center operators, whose plans can change without warning.
  • Design-win competition from larger rivals — Texas Instruments, Analog Devices and other larger analog chipmakers compete for the same design sockets, and losing a design cycle can mean years without that customer's business.
  • Dependence on outside foundries — MPS owns no fabrication plants and relies on contract manufacturers for wafers and packaging, so capacity shortages or supplier disruption limit how much it can ship.
  • Cyclical end markets — Automotive, industrial and consumer electronics production all slow in a weaker economy, and inventory corrections at customers have caused sharp swings in orders before.

Customer concentration

MPS does not disclose individual customer names or percentages, but the Enterprise Data segment — its fastest-growing — is concentrated around a small number of AI computing customers, making that growth more fragile than the automotive or industrial businesses.

The case for

Buyers argue that each new generation of AI servers needs more power-delivery silicon than the last, that MPS's design-win model locks in revenue once a chip is chosen, and that Storage/Computing and Enterprise Data growth show the company capturing a disproportionate share of that buildout.

The case against

Sellers fear that the AI-driven growth rests on a handful of customers who could qualify a competing chip or slow their own capital spending, that automotive and industrial end markets remain cyclical, and that larger rivals with deeper resources will eventually contest the design wins MPS has won.

Written by the editors, published on August 18, 2026

Direct competitors

Who this company fights with for the same customers

No editorial profile for this company yet

No competitor list for this company yet.

Balance Sheet & Liquidity

Revenue

$3.27B

Trailing 12 months (through 6/30/2026)

Net Income

$802M

Trailing 12 months (through 6/30/2026)

Free Cash Flow

$666M

Total Equity

$3.53B

Total Liabilities

$663M

Current Ratio

4.98

Interest Coverage

-

Debt/EBITDA

0.02

Earnings Per Share

Revenue & Net Income

Free Cash Flow

Income Breakdown

Historical statement

Margins over time

Debt over time

How heavy the debt is

Growth grid

Growth — Revenue

Fair Value Estimation

Fairly Valued

Fair Value

$1124.29

Current Price

$1302.88

Margin of Safety

-15.9%

Fair Value Range

$730.79 - $1517.79

Estimation Methods

Analyst Target:$1842.64
DCF:$467.49
PE-based:$780.75
Graham Growth:$846.85
EPV:$108.30
Analyst Consensus:Strong Buy (19B / 4H / 0S)
Last Earnings Surprise:+8.63%

Valuation Metrics

P/E Ratio

78.45

ROE

17.6%

P/B Ratio

16.21

P/FCF

107.85

Gross Margin

55.2%

ROIC

17.7%

Profitability Radar

Value Creation (Economic Moat)

ROIC

17.7%

WACC

13.9%

ROIC − WACC

+3.8 pp

ROIC exceeds the cost of capital — the company is creating value for shareholders.

Fundamental Analysis Criteria

Passed (19)

  • EPS shows upward trend
  • EPS CAGR 21.91%
  • Price CAGR 32.01%
  • ROIC 17.7%
  • Gross Margin 55.2%
  • Debt/Equity ratio
  • Operating Margin 28.7%
  • Positive Free Cash Flow
  • Current Ratio
  • Debt/EBITDA
  • Return on Tangible Assets
  • Low reliance on intangibles
  • ROE 21.9%
  • Revenue Growth 5Y 27.0%
  • Analyst Consensus 83% Buy
  • Earnings Surprise avg 2.5%
  • Earnings Quality (OCF/NI) 1.03
  • Share Dilution -1.0%
  • Piotroski F-Score 7/9

Failed (7)

  • P/FCF 107.85
  • P/B Ratio 16.21
  • CapEx intensity
  • Price below Graham Number
  • DCF valuation (Overvalued)
  • PEG Ratio 2.92
  • Net Margin Trend 24.5% vs 65.6%

Unavailable (2)

  • Dividend Payout NaN%
  • Interest Coverage

Piotroski F-Score

7/9

Strong financial health

score
criteria

Earnings Quality

1.03

High quality: earnings backed by cash

Share Dilution

-1.0%

Buying back shares. Shareholder friendly

Governance

Executive Team

NameTitleAge
Mr. Michael R. HsingFounder, Chairman, President & CEO65
Mr. Deming XiaoExecutive Vice President of Global Operations62
Ms. Saria TsengEVP of Strategic Corporate Development, General Counsel & Corporate Secretary54
Mr. Maurice SciammasExecutive Vice President of Worldwide Sales & Marketing65
Mr. Robert W. Dean IIInterim Chief Financial Officer60
Ms. Genevieve CunninghamSenior Manager of Marketing Communications-
Mr. Tony BalowVice President of Finance-
Arthur LeeFinance Manager-

Audit Risk

10

Board Risk

8

Compensation Risk

4

Shareholder Rights Risk

9

Part 2 · The price and when to enter

This part won't tell you whether the company is worth owning: it helps you choose when to buy it, once the fundamentals have convinced you. Inside: technical analysis, potential, historical drawdowns, gamma exposure.

Latest News

Recent headlines for MPWR, sourced from Markets Gazette.

  • 6/15/2026POSITIVE
    Here's How Much $1000 Invested In Monolithic Power Systems 5 Years Ago Would Be Worth Today

    An investment of $1000 in Monolithic Power Systems (MPWR) five years ago would have grown to approximately $4,790 today, representing a significant return of 379%. This performance outpaces the broader market and highlights the company's strong growth trajectory and investor appeal. MPWR's consistent revenue increases and expanding market share in the power management semiconductor sector have been key drivers. Investors considering the stock should note its historical performance as an indicator of potential future gains, though past results do not guarantee future outcomes.

via Markets Gazette