Back to rankings

SSR Mining Inc. (SSRM)

POSITIVE
Basic MaterialsGoldUnited States

Fundamental

72

Price

$38.03

Market Cap

$7.81B

Part 1 · What the company is worth

Overview

SSR Mining Inc. is a precious-metals mining company incorporated in British Columbia, Canada, headquartered in Denver, Colorado, and listed on both Nasdaq and the Toronto Stock Exchange under SSRM. It mines gold and silver at five sites: Marigold in Nevada, Cripple Creek & Victor (CC&V) in Colorado, Seabee in Saskatchewan, Puna in Jujuy Province, Argentina, and Çöpler in Erzincan Province, Türkiye. The four gold mines produce doré, unrefined bullion bars that are more than 90% gold and are sent to third-party refiners; Puna produces silver, lead and zinc concentrates. Çöpler has been shut down since 13 February 2024, when a heap-leach pad slipped; its operating permits were revoked and the 10-K states the company cannot estimate when, or whether, operations will resume. CC&V was bought from Newmont on 28 February 2025 for $100.0 million upfront plus up to $175.0 million in milestone payments, and it contributed revenue for ten months of 2025. In fiscal 2025 the group earned revenue of $1,629.6 million and operating income of $461.4 million, against an operating loss of $322.3 million in 2024.

How it makes money

SSR Mining sells commodities at prices it does not set. Gold doré from Marigold, CC&V and Seabee is refined to bullion and sold mainly to bullion banks in the London spot market, with the price fixed on the day of sale at the applicable gold fix or spot price and payment due on delivery of the bullion credits; doré from Çöpler, when it operates, is sold on the Istanbul Gold Exchange, where the Central Bank of Türkiye has first right of refusal on all gold mined in the country. Puna's silver-lead and zinc concentrates are sold to smelters and traders in Asia and Europe under contracts renewed annually or on the spot market, net of treatment and refining charges, with the price provisional until settlement. In 2025 gold was 71% of product revenue, silver 24%, lead 3% and other items 2%. Revenue therefore moves with two things only: how many ounces are produced and what the metal is worth on the day — the average gold price was $3,435/oz in 2025 against $2,387/oz in 2024, which is most of why revenue rose 63.7%.

Revenue by segment

Marigold (Nevada, USA)33%

A group of open-pit gold mines on the Battle Mountain-Eureka trend, running a run-of-mine heap-leach operation that produces gold doré sold to bullion banks.

CC&V — Cripple Creek & Victor (Colorado, USA)28%

An open-pit gold mine in Teller County acquired from Newmont on 28 February 2025, leaching crushed and run-of-mine material in valley leach facilities to produce doré. The 2025 figures cover only the ten months from the acquisition date.

Puna (Jujuy, Argentina)28%

The group's silver operation, producing silver-lead and zinc concentrates sold to smelters and traders in Asia and Europe rather than refined metal.

Seabee (Saskatchewan, Canada)11%

An underground gold mine complex whose ore is milled on site by gravity concentration and cyanide leaching into doré. Operations were suspended for about two weeks in 2025 because forest fires cut the power supply.

Çöpler (Erzincan, Türkiye)0%

An open-pit gold operation with oxide and sulfide circuits that sells its doré to the Central Bank of Türkiye. It has produced nothing since 13 February 2024: all operations ceased after the heap-leach pad slip and it generated zero revenue in 2025 while absorbing care-and-maintenance and remediation costs.

Competitive moat

No identified moat · None

SSR Mining has no durable competitive advantage of the kind that protects pricing. It sells gold and silver at world prices set by the market, so it cannot charge more than anyone else for the same ounce, and its customers — bullion banks and smelters — face no switching cost at all. The 10-K itself describes the industry as intensely competitive for orebodies, technical staff, labour and capital, and notes that many larger competitors have more financial and technical resources. The only thing resembling a barrier is the ore in the ground and the permits attached to it, and Çöpler shows how fragile that is: after the February 2024 incident the operating permits were revoked and the mine has produced nothing since. Nor is SSR protected by cost position — its results improved in 2025 chiefly because the gold price rose, not because it out-produced anyone.

What drives demand

Cyclical

Demand for the ounces themselves rarely disappears — there is always a buyer for gold at some price — but the price does the swinging, and the price is the whole business. The filing says the market prices of gold and silver are the key drivers of profitability and that they can fluctuate widely, moved by consumption patterns, central-bank buying and selling, monetary and fiscal policy, interest rates, currencies and inflation expectations. Gold has an unusual twist for a commodity: it is bought as a safe haven in market turmoil and as a defence against inflation and currency depreciation, so it can rise exactly when industrial demand is falling. Silver, 24% of 2025 product revenue, behaves more like an industrial metal, as do the lead and zinc by-products. The result is a very volatile top line for reasons outside the company's control: revenue was $1,426.9 million in 2023, fell 30.2% to $995.6 million in 2024 when Çöpler stopped, then rose 63.7% to $1,629.6 million in 2025 as gold averaged $3,435/oz against $2,387/oz the year before. Costs barely move with prices, so profits amplify the swing — an operating loss of $322.3 million in 2024 became operating income of $461.4 million in 2025.

Key risks

  • The Çöpler Incident: losses, liabilities and a restart nobody can date — The company discloses that actual and potential losses and liabilities from the February 2024 heap-leach slip could materially hurt its financial condition, liquidity, cash flows and results. Operating permits and the 2021 environmental impact assessment were revoked and remain suspended; investigations and remediation continue; the company states it cannot predict if, when or on what conditions it will be allowed to restart, and that a restart under the older 2014 assessment would limit the sulfide plant to 6,000 tonnes per day instead of 9,000. Management attention and cash may be diverted from the other mines to fund remediation or pay claims.
  • Metal prices fluctuate widely and the company cannot influence them — The 10-K lists among the drivers of gold and silver prices: consumption patterns, supply and demand, central-bank gold sales, purchases or leasing, monetary and fiscal policy, recession or reduced economic activity, speculative short positions, forward sales by producers, the cost of metal substitutes, weaker industrial, jewellery or investment demand, import and export taxes and tariffs, inflation expectations, interest rates and currency values. None of these is under the company's control, and all of them feed straight into revenue.
  • Reserve estimates may not hold, and reserves may not be replaced — Estimates of mineral reserves and resources rest on interpretation and assumptions and may yield less metal in practice than currently estimated. Separately, the company warns it may be unable to replace the reserves it mines or to acquire additional commercially mineable mineral rights — a mine is a depleting asset, and the filing notes that the copper reserves and resources previously reported at Çöpler were removed entirely once the heap leach was set for decommissioning.
  • Political and regulatory risk in the countries where the mines are — The company mines under concessions granted by, or contracts with, the governments of the United States, Canada, Argentina and Türkiye, and states these are subject to the political risks of the host country. It discloses risks from political or economic instability and unexpected regulatory change, from civil disobedience, from the obligation to provide benefits to host communities and countries, from Indigenous peoples' title claims and rights to consultation and accommodation, and from tax assessments in multiple jurisdictions.
  • Closure and remediation obligations may exceed the amounts set aside — Land reclamation, mine closure and remediation requirements and costs may be burdensome, and actual environmental and asset-retirement obligations may exceed the company's estimates and reserves. The group booked $88.9 million of reclamation and remediation costs and $151.8 million of care-and-maintenance expense in 2025, most of it at the idle Çöpler site.
  • Rising costs, supply chain and energy — Increased operating and capital costs could affect profitability. Operations depend on continuous supplies of diesel, tyres, sodium cyanide, reagents, energy, water, equipment and labour, whose costs are set by world supply and demand; the company flags supply-chain disruptions, power outages, labour disputes and shifting trade and tariff policies as things that could raise costs, and notes the specific fragility of the seasonal ice road that serves Seabee.
  • Counterparty risk on the sale of doré and concentrates — The company states there is no assurance it will succeed in entering into arrangements to sell its doré or concentrates on acceptable terms, or at all, and that it may be forced to sell in the spot market or find no market for its products. It is also exposed if a counterparty fails to honour an arrangement or becomes insolvent, or if its doré or concentrates fail to meet the qualitative or quantitative requirements of buyers.

Customer concentration

Top customers account for 69% of revenue

Very concentrated on paper, much less so in substance. The 10-K's table of customers accounting for 10% or more of gross revenue lists, for 2025, Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce at 33%, Royal Bank of Canada at 13%, National Bank of Canada at 12% and Trafigura Trading LLC at 11% — four names that together add up to 69% of gross revenue. The first three are bullion banks buying refined gold from Marigold, CC&V and Seabee; Trafigura buys Puna's concentrate. Because gold is sold at the daily fix or spot price on a liquid world market, losing one of these buyers means finding another counterparty, not losing a customer relationship or a price. Puna's concentrate sales are the more genuinely relationship-bound side, sold under annually renewed contracts to smelters and traders in Asia and Europe. The names also change fast: in 2024 the disclosed customers were CIBC at 30% and Asahi Refinery at 13%, and in 2023 CIBC at 33% and the Central Bank of Türkiye at 31%.

The case for

Buyers argue that the business behind the headline damage is working. Without a single ounce from Çöpler, the four running mines produced $1,629.6 million of revenue and $461.4 million of operating income in 2025, against an operating loss of $322.3 million the year before, and the company ended the year with $534.8 million of cash and cash equivalents against $387.9 million a year earlier. They point to the CC&V purchase — $100.0 million paid upfront to Newmont, with up to $175.0 million more tied to permitting milestones — which delivered 28% of group revenue in ten months of ownership and shifted the portfolio towards the United States. They note that Marigold, CC&V and Seabee sit in the US and Canada, and that Puna adds a silver operation whose metal made up 24% of 2025 product revenue while silver averaged $39.94/oz against $28.25/oz in 2024. On this reading, Çöpler and the Hod Maden development project in Türkiye are options the current results do not depend on: the filing says the company continues to progress Hod Maden, and any restart at Çöpler would come on top of a group already generating cash without it.

The case against

Sellers fear that 2025 flatters a company whose problems are not resolved. Çöpler has produced nothing since February 2024, its permits and its 2021 environmental impact assessment were revoked, and the company itself says it cannot estimate or predict if, when or under what conditions it may resume — while the site still cost $151.8 million in care and maintenance and drove most of $88.9 million of reclamation and remediation charges in 2025, and the filing states insurance is not expected to fully cover the losses. Çöpler carried $2,612.5 million of the group's $6,093.9 million of total assets at year-end: an asset earning nothing. Sellers also note that almost all of the year's improvement came from the metal price rather than from the company — gold averaged $3,435/oz in 2025 against $1,943/oz in 2023 — and the filing itself lists the macro forces that set that price, from central-bank policy and interest rates to currencies, speculative positioning and inflation expectations, all of them outside management's hands. Beyond that they point to the disclosed risks that reserve estimates may not be realised and that reserves may not be replaced, to a portfolio now leaning on three producing gold mines and one silver mine, to exposure to Türkiye and Argentina, and to the company's own warning that closure and remediation obligations may exceed the amounts set aside.

Generated on August 23, 2026 with claude-opus-5 — shared with all users

Direct competitors

Who this company fights with for the same customers

Generated on August 23, 2026 with claude-opus-5 — shared with all users

Centerra Gold Inc.CGAU

The closest structural match to SSR Mining: a mid-tier gold producer running an open-pit heap-leach mine in Türkiye (Öksüt) alongside Canadian mines and a Nevada development project, so the two bid against each other for the same Turkish and North American gold assets, permits and technical staff.

Eldorado Gold CorporationEGO

Another mid-tier gold miner whose production core sits in Türkiye (Kışladağ and Efemçukuru) plus Canada, competing with SSR Mining for Turkish mining concessions, local skilled labour and the same pool of investors who accept Turkish country risk.

Coeur Mining, Inc.CDE

A US-based precious-metals producer with the same gold-plus-silver revenue mix and the same kind of assets — a Nevada heap-leach silver-gold mine and Latin American silver operations — putting it head to head with SSR Mining's Marigold and Puna mines for reserves, contractors and capital.

Alamos Gold Inc.AGI

An intermediate North American gold producer of comparable size (about 545,000 ounces in 2025) operating in Canada and Mexico, competing for the same acquisition targets, mining engineers and generalist gold-fund money as SSR Mining.

Equinox Gold Corp.EQX

An Americas-focused gold producer with mines in Canada, the United States and Latin America built through acquisitions, competing with SSR Mining for the same pipeline of North and South American gold assets and for growth-oriented investors in the mid-tier segment.

Balance Sheet & Liquidity

Revenue

$1.91B

Trailing 12 months (through 6/30/2026)

Net Income

$238M

Trailing 12 months (through 6/30/2026)

Free Cash Flow

$242M

Total Equity

$3.51B

Total Liabilities

$1.78B

Current Ratio

9.79

Interest Coverage

46.63

Debt/EBITDA

0.00

Earnings Per Share

Revenue & Net Income

Free Cash Flow

Income Breakdown

Historical statement

Margins over time

Debt over time

How heavy the debt is

Growth grid

Growth — Revenue

Fair Value Estimation

Fairly Valued

Fair Value

$48.05

Current Price

$38.03

Margin of Safety

+20.9%

Fair Value Range

$31.23 - $64.87

Estimation Methods

Analyst Target:$41.40
DCF:$80.61
PE-based:$14.86
Graham Growth:$87.92
EPV:$36.72
Analyst Consensus:Strong Buy (12B / 1H / 0S)
Last Earnings Surprise:-12.42%

Valuation Metrics

P/E Ratio

35.10

ROE

11.3%

P/B Ratio

2.32

P/FCF

22.34

Gross Margin

-

ROIC

13.3%

Profitability Radar

Value Creation (Economic Moat)

ROIC

13.3%

WACC

8.0%

ROIC − WACC

+5.3 pp

ROIC exceeds the cost of capital — the company is creating value for shareholders.

Fundamental Analysis Criteria

Passed (20)

  • EPS shows upward trend
  • EPS CAGR 15.48%
  • Price CAGR 15.53%
  • ROIC 13.3%
  • P/FCF 22.34
  • P/B Ratio 2.32
  • Debt/Equity ratio
  • Operating Margin 35.6%
  • Positive Free Cash Flow
  • Current Ratio
  • Interest Coverage
  • Debt/EBITDA
  • Return on Tangible Assets
  • Low reliance on intangibles
  • Revenue Growth 5Y 13.8%
  • Analyst Consensus 92% Buy
  • Earnings Surprise avg 24.7%
  • PEG Ratio 1.86
  • Earnings Quality (OCF/NI) 2.51
  • Piotroski F-Score 5/9

Failed (6)

  • CapEx intensity
  • Price below Graham Number
  • DCF valuation (Overvalued)
  • ROE 6.9%
  • Share Dilution 5.6%
  • Net Margin Trend 12.5% vs 12.7%

Unavailable (2)

  • Gross Margin NaN%
  • Dividend Payout NaN%

Piotroski F-Score

5/9

Mixed signals: some areas need attention

score
criteria

Earnings Quality

2.51

High quality: earnings backed by cash

Share Dilution

5.6%

Issuing new shares, diluting ownership

Governance

Executive Team

NameTitleAge
Mr. Rodney P. Antal Accountancy, B.Bus, C.P.A.Executive Chairman58
Mr. Michael J. Sparks B.Sc., J.D.Executive VP & CFO43
Mr. William MacNevinExecutive Vice President of Operations & Sustainability59
Mr. F. Edward Farid B.Com, FinanceExecutive VP & Chief Strategy Officer40
Mr. John EbbettExecutive Vice President of Growth & Innovation43
Mr. Russell FarnsworthVP of Accounting & Controller-
Mr. Alex HunchakVice President of Investor Relations-
Ms. Joanne ThomopoulosExecutive Vice President of Human Resources-
Dr. Cengiz Y. DemirciVice President of Exploration-
Mr. Eric GunningCorporate Secretary-

Audit Risk

10

Board Risk

6

Compensation Risk

5

Shareholder Rights Risk

4

Part 2 · The price and when to enter

This part won't tell you whether the company is worth owning: it helps you choose when to buy it, once the fundamentals have convinced you. Inside: technical analysis, potential, historical drawdowns, gamma exposure.

Latest News

Recent headlines for SSRM, sourced from Markets Gazette.

  • 3/11/2026NEGATIVE
    Why SSR Mining Stock Dropped Today

    SSR Mining Inc. experienced a significant stock price decline today, directly correlated with a drop in gold prices. The company's shares fell, mirroring the broader commodity market's downturn. This movement suggests that investors are reacting to the commodity price volatility, impacting the mining company's valuation. For shareholders, this highlights the sensitivity of mining stocks to underlying commodity prices and the need to monitor gold market trends closely.

  • 3/4/2026POSITIVE
    Why SSR Mining Stock Just Popped

    SSR Mining Inc. is in an excellent financial position, already holding more cash than its total debt. Future outlook indicates a substantial further increase in cash, suggesting robust financial management and growth potential. This positive scenario for investors points to strong debt repayment capacity and high operational flexibility, which could translate into an increased share price for SSRM in the short to medium term.

  • 3/3/2026POSITIVE
    SSR Mining Stock Up 180% as New $5 Million Stake Signals Gold Conviction

    SSR Mining, a diversified gold, silver, and base metal miner, has recently captured significant investor attention, with its stock surging an impressive 180%. This substantial increase follows news of a new $5 million stake, signaling strong conviction in the gold sector and the company's future prospects. Operating a vertically integrated model across four continents, SSR Mining manages a robust portfolio from exploration to extraction. This structure allows for comprehensive control over its value chain. The capital injection and the stock's performance suggest that the market is recognizing the intrinsic value of its operations and its ability to capitalize on the increasing demand for precious metals, particularly gold, amidst an uncertain economic landscape. Investors should closely monitor SSR Mining's capacity to sustain this growth and effectively deploy the new capital to further expand its global operations.

  • 2/22/2026NEUTRAL
    This Fund Sold its Entire Stake in SSR Mining Stock After a 200% Rally. Should You Too?

    A significant investment fund has divested its entire stake in SSR Mining Inc. (SSRM) following an impressive 200% rally. SSR Mining, a global precious metals producer involved in gold, silver, and base metals across four continents, experienced substantial stock appreciation. The fund's decision prompts questions about the sustainability of this rally and the company's future outlook. Investors must now consider whether this move signals a warning or a strategic profit-taking action in a volatile market, given the company's diversified operations.

via Markets Gazette