Back to rankings

Talen Energy Corporation (TLN)

NEUTRAL
UtilitiesUtilities - Independent Power ProducersUnited States

Fundamental

35

Price

$306.94

Market Cap

$15.07B

Part 1 · What the company is worth

Overview

Talen Energy owns and operates power plants totalling roughly 10.7 gigawatts, the centrepiece being its stake in the Susquehanna nuclear plant in Pennsylvania, alongside natural gas and coal generation. It sells the electricity it produces into the PJM regional grid that covers much of the mid-Atlantic and Midwest, and has begun signing long-term contracts to sell power directly to data centre operators such as Amazon Web Services instead of only to the open market.

How it makes money

Revenue mainly comes from two sources: selling the electricity actually generated at prices set by the wholesale power market, and capacity payments earned simply for having generation available to the grid when needed, regardless of whether it runs. The multi-decade agreement to supply Amazon's Susquehanna-area data centres shifts part of future revenue toward long-term, fixed-price contracts, reducing exposure to swings in the merchant power price over time as it ramps up through the 2030s.

Competitive moat

Patents and licences · Narrow

Operating a nuclear plant requires a federal licence that takes years to obtain and a facility that takes decades to build, so Susquehanna's baseload output cannot realistically be replicated by a new competitor any time soon. That protects the nuclear share of the fleet, but Talen's gas and coal plants compete in an open wholesale market with no comparable barrier.

What drives demand

Moderately cyclical

Electricity demand in Talen's PJM footprint is being pushed structurally higher by data centre and AI computing growth, which is a genuinely new and durable driver rather than a normal economic cycle. At the same time, the portion of output still sold into the open market remains exposed to swings in wholesale power prices driven by weather, fuel costs and grid conditions.

Key risks

  • Exposure to wholesale power price swings — The portion of generation not yet covered by long-term contracts is sold at prices that fluctuate with weather, local grid conditions and broader energy markets, so results can vary sharply between periods.
  • PJM capacity market and regulatory outcomes — A meaningful share of revenue depends on capacity auction results and PJM market rules, which regulators and grid operators can change in ways that reduce what generators like Talen are paid.
  • Nuclear operating and regulatory risk — Susquehanna is subject to continuous oversight by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission; an unplanned outage, safety finding or licensing dispute could take a large, low-cost source of generation offline.
  • Debt-funded acquisitions raising leverage — Talen has funded recent generation acquisitions partly with new debt, increasing financial leverage at a time when it is also committing to large, long-dated contracts.
  • Long-dated contract execution risk — The Amazon agreement runs through 2042 and ramps up gradually; delivering on it reliably over two decades, and having the counterparty's needs stay as expected, is not guaranteed.

Customer concentration

Talen does not disclose a customer revenue share, but its power purchase agreement with Amazon Web Services, ramping to up to 1,920 megawatts by 2032 under a contract running through 2042, is set to become a large and growing part of total revenue over time.

The case for

Buyers argue that owning scarce, carbon-free nuclear capacity next to a fast-growing data centre corridor puts Talen at the centre of AI-driven electricity demand, that the Amazon contract locks in decades of revenue at attractive terms, and that new nuclear capacity is too slow and expensive for competitors to add.

The case against

Sellers fear that the portion of output still exposed to merchant power prices can swing results sharply, that leverage taken on to fund recent acquisitions leaves less room for error, and that a two-decade contract with a single counterparty concentrates risk that will only become visible many years from now.

Written by the editors, published on August 18, 2026

Direct competitors

Who this company fights with for the same customers

No editorial profile for this company yet

No competitor list for this company yet.

Balance Sheet & Liquidity

Revenue

$3.92B

Trailing 12 months (through 6/30/2026)

Net Income

$-185M

Trailing 12 months (through 6/30/2026)

Free Cash Flow

$606M

Total Equity

$1.09B

Total Liabilities

$9.81B

Current Ratio

0.78

Interest Coverage

-

Debt/EBITDA

50.65

Earnings Per Share

Revenue & Net Income

Free Cash Flow

Income Breakdown

Historical statement

Margins over time

Debt over time

How heavy the debt is

Growth grid

Growth — Revenue

Fair Value Estimation

Fairly Valued

Fair Value

$291.65

Current Price

$306.94

Margin of Safety

-5.2%

Fair Value Range

$189.57 - $393.72

Estimation Methods

Analyst Target:$465.19
DCF:$153.77
PE-based:-
Graham Growth:-
EPV:$11.10
Analyst Consensus:Strong Buy (20B / 3H / 0S)
Last Earnings Surprise:-160.85%

Valuation Metrics

P/E Ratio

-

ROE

-20.0%

P/B Ratio

9.06

P/FCF

25.77

Gross Margin

-

ROIC

0.5%

Profitability Radar

Value Creation (Economic Moat)

ROIC

0.5%

WACC

8.8%

ROIC − WACC

-8.3 pp

ROIC is below the cost of capital — the company is destroying value for every dollar invested.

Fundamental Analysis Criteria

Passed (8)

  • Price CAGR 69.98%
  • P/FCF 25.77
  • Positive Free Cash Flow
  • Current Ratio
  • Low reliance on intangibles
  • Revenue Growth 5Y 8.4%
  • Analyst Consensus 87% Buy
  • Share Dilution -19.1%

Failed (13)

  • EPS shows upward trend
  • ROIC 0.5%
  • P/B Ratio 9.06
  • Debt/Equity ratio
  • Operating Margin 2.2%
  • CapEx intensity
  • Debt/EBITDA
  • Return on Tangible Assets
  • DCF valuation (Overvalued)
  • ROE -14.1%
  • Earnings Surprise avg -132.0%
  • Net Margin Trend -4.7% vs 10.0%
  • Piotroski F-Score 3/9

Unavailable (6)

  • Gross Margin NaN%
  • Dividend Payout NaN%
  • Interest Coverage
  • Price below Graham Number
  • PEG Ratio (need PE > 0 and growth > 0)
  • Earnings Quality (OCF/Net Income)

Piotroski F-Score

3/9

Serious financial concerns

score
criteria

Earnings Quality

-

Low quality: investigate accounting

Share Dilution

-19.1%

Buying back shares. Shareholder friendly

Governance

Executive Team

NameTitleAge
Mr. Mark Allen McFarlandCEO & Director56
Mr. Terry L. NuttPresident47
Mr. Brad L. BerrymanChief Operating Officer55
Mr. Andrew M. Wright J.D.Chief Administrative Officer58
Mr. Cole Muller J.D.Chief Financial Officer44
Mr. Anthony J. PlagensSenior VP & Chief Accounting Officer-
Mr. Daniel Jude KellyGeneral Counsel & Corporate Secretary-
Ms. Taryne WilliamsDirector of Corporate Communications-
Mr. Dale E. Lebsack Jr.Chief Asset Development Officer49
Mr. Christopher E. MoriceChief Commercial Officer45

Audit Risk

6

Board Risk

3

Compensation Risk

4

Shareholder Rights Risk

2

Part 2 · The price and when to enter

This part won't tell you whether the company is worth owning: it helps you choose when to buy it, once the fundamentals have convinced you. Inside: technical analysis, potential, historical drawdowns, gamma exposure.

Latest News

Recent headlines for TLN, sourced from Markets Gazette.

  • 2/27/2026NEUTRAL
    Talen (TLN) Q4 2025 Earnings Call Transcript

    The news concerns the release of the Q4 2025 earnings call transcript for Talen Energy (TLN). While such an event is crucial for investors seeking to analyze the company's financial performance and future outlook, the specific content of the transcript is not available at this time. Investors typically await these details to assess results and guidance, which could influence market sentiment. Without key data points, the announcement itself remains a procedural update, lacking immediate directional implications for the stock's value.

via Markets Gazette