Back to rankings

Atmos Energy Corp (ATO)

Overvalued
UtilitiesUtilities - Regulated GasUnited States

Fundamental

64

Price

$172.21

Market Cap

$28.21B

Part 1 · What the company is worth

Overview

Atmos Energy is a natural gas distribution utility serving approximately 3.4 million residential, commercial, public authority and industrial customers across eight states primarily in the South. It operates as a regulated utility under state regulatory frameworks that approve rates sufficient to cover operating costs and provide a regulated return on invested capital. The company also operates pipeline and storage assets in Texas and Louisiana.

How it makes money

Atmos Energy generates revenues primarily through regulated rate-based mechanisms approved by state public utility commissions. The company earns a return on its rate base of invested capital. A significant portion of revenues is insulated from commodity price volatility through cost recovery mechanisms such as purchased gas adjustment clauses that provide dollar-for-dollar offset to changes in natural gas costs. The company also generates revenues from transportation services for third parties using its distribution and pipeline systems, recovering capital expenditures through formula rate mechanisms in four states and infrastructure programs in all states, with approximately 95% of capex recovered within six months.

Revenue by segment

Distributionshare not disclosed

Regulated natural gas distribution across six divisions serving residential, commercial, public authority and industrial customers in Texas, Kentucky, Tennessee, Virginia, Louisiana, Mississippi and Colorado-Kansas. Operates 76,000 miles of underground distribution pipeline infrastructure serving the dominant portion of company revenue.

Pipeline and Storageshare not disclosed

Comprises primarily Atmos Pipeline-Texas (APT), described as one of the largest intrastate pipeline operations in Texas, plus 21-mile Louisiana transmission pipeline. Operates five underground storage facilities in Texas. Generates revenues from natural gas transportation and storage services under regulated ratemaking.

Competitive moat

Switching costs · Wide

Atmos Energy benefits from a regulated utility model that creates substantial switching costs and barriers to entry. The company holds exclusive franchise agreements (1,010 active franchises with terms of 5-35 years) granting it monopoly distribution rights in its service territories. Once connected to the distribution system, customers face prohibitive costs to switch suppliers. Regulated cost-recovery mechanisms and formula rate procedures reduce execution risk and provide predictable returns independent of competitive pressures. However, the moat relies entirely on regulatory protection and government licensing rather than proprietary technology or brand loyalty.

What drives demand

Defensive

Natural gas distribution is a defensive business with counter-cyclical characteristics. Demand is driven by heating needs during cold months (approximately 70% of distribution revenues earned in first six months of fiscal year), while summer demand is minimal. The business is insulated from economic cycles through regulatory cost-recovery mechanisms that ensure revenues regardless of external cost fluctuations or commodity prices. Weather normalization adjustment mechanisms further dampen volatility. Demand growth primarily stems from customer growth in service territories and rate base expansion through infrastructure investment, rather than per-capita consumption growth which has been relatively flat.

Key risks

  • Regulatory lag and rate approval delays — The company's revenues depend on rates established by state regulatory authorities. Changes in regulatory policy, delayed rate recoveries, or unfavorable rate decisions could impact financial performance and the company's ability to invest in safety and infrastructure improvements. The company is pursuing formula rate mechanisms and infrastructure programs to reduce regulatory lag.
  • Weather and demand volatility — Peak-day natural gas demand fluctuates significantly with weather. While weather normalization adjustment (WNA) mechanisms in seven states cover approximately 97% of distribution residential and commercial revenues, unexpected severe weather or mild winters can still affect operational performance and demand. The company noted peak-day demand can reach 4.2 Bcf against estimated supply capacity of 5.4 Bcf.
  • Capital intensity and infrastructure modernization requirements — The business requires substantial ongoing capital expenditures for infrastructure modernization, safety improvements, and system upgrades. The company spent $3.6 billion in capex in FY2025 and plans $26 billion for FY2026-2030. Inability to timely recover these investments through regulatory mechanisms could strain finances and limit future infrastructure investment.
  • Natural gas supply chain and operational disruptions — Operations depend on reliable supply from multiple independent producers and marketers. Service interruptions could impair the company's ability to serve customers. Compliance with PHMSA pipeline safety regulations and state environmental statutes requires continuous expenditure and carries operational risk.
  • Competition from alternative energy sources — Shifts in energy policy, adoption of alternative fuels, or increased electric heating could reduce natural gas demand. Changes in customer preferences or government incentives favoring renewable energy could affect long-term demand and revenues.

Customer concentration

Atmos Energy serves a highly diversified customer base of approximately 3.4 million meters across eight states and 1,010 active franchises. Revenue is distributed across residential, commercial, public authority, and industrial customer segments. No single customer concentration risk is disclosed in the filing. Geographic concentration exists in certain divisions (Mid-Tex Division serves 1.83 million meters), but regulatory frameworks across eight states provide natural diversification. The regulated utility model typically does not involve customer concentration risk.

The case for

Buyers argue that Atmos Energy offers stable, predictable cash flows backed by regulated utility earnings and a captive customer base with monopoly distribution rights. The company's formula rate mechanisms in four states and infrastructure programs across all jurisdictions provide reliable revenue growth tied to capital investment. With approximately 87% of $3.6 billion annual capex directed to safety and reliability, the company is well-positioned for long-term regulatory support and rate recovery. The $333.6 million in annualized regulatory outcomes implemented in FY2025 demonstrates the company's ability to achieve favorable rate decisions. Weather normalization mechanisms cover 97% of revenues, reducing earnings volatility. The regulated utility model provides a wide economic moat with high switching costs for customers. Dividend growth (14.9% annual increase announced) and S&P 500 inclusion provide additional investor appeal.

The case against

Sellers fear that Atmos Energy's growth is capped by regulatory constraints and mature service territories with limited population expansion. The company depends entirely on government approval of rates and investment recovery, creating regulatory risk. Recent ratemaking activity of $333.6 million annually indicates growing pressure from regulators to justify rate increases, suggesting limited headroom for further recovery improvements. Peak demand capacity (4.2 Bcf actual vs. 5.4 Bcf available) indicates efficient operations but limited growth runway. The defensive business model provides stability but offers minimal appreciation upside, making it primarily a dividend play. Long-term secular headwinds from energy policy shifts toward renewables and electrification could reduce natural gas demand. Heavy capital intensity ($26 billion over five years) requires ongoing funding, creating refinancing risk. Regulatory lag, despite mitigation efforts, can create earnings volatility when rate decisions are delayed.

Generated with artificial intelligence on September 21, 2026, shared with all users

Direct competitors

Who this company fights with for the same customers

Compare

Generated with artificial intelligence on September 18, 2026, shared with all users

P/E: 25.2Score: 60Market cap: $26.38B

CenterPoint runs the gas distribution utility serving Houston and other Texas communities, competing for the same Texas residential and commercial gas customers and before the same Texas regulator as Atmos's Mid-Tex division.

ONE Gas, Inc.OGS

Like Atmos, ONE Gas is a pure-play regulated gas distributor with no electric business, and its Texas Gas Service and Kansas Gas Service units serve households in the same two states where Atmos has its Mid-Tex and Colorado-Kansas divisions.

Spire Inc.SR

Spire is another gas-only regulated utility holding company whose Missouri, Alabama and Mississippi utilities sell residential and commercial gas service under the same rate-case model, overlapping Atmos in Mississippi.

Southwest Gas Holdings, Inc.SWX

Southwest Gas distributes regulated natural gas to roughly two million residential and commercial customers in Arizona, Nevada and California, the closest match to Atmos's gas-only distribution model outside its own service territory.

Oncor Electric Delivery Company LLCNot tracked

Atmos's own 10-K names electric utilities as its rival energy source, and Oncor delivers the electricity that competes with Atmos gas for space heating, water heating and cooking in the Dallas-Fort Worth homes that are Atmos's largest market.

Balance Sheet & Liquidity

Revenue

$4.92B

Trailing 12 months (through 6/30/2026)

Net Income

$1.40B

Trailing 12 months (through 6/30/2026)

Free Cash Flow

$-1.51B

Total Equity

$13.56B

Total Liabilities

$14.69B

Current Ratio

0.81

Interest Coverage

12.77

Debt/EBITDA

4.47

Earnings Per Share

Revenue & Net Income

Free Cash Flow

Income Breakdown

Historical statement

Margins over time

Debt over time

How heavy the debt is

Growth grid

Growth — Revenue

Fair Value Estimation

Regulated utilityOvervalued

Fair Value

$124.41

Current Price

$172.21

Margin of Safety

-38.4%

Fair Value Range

$84.28 - $164.53

Spread across the valuation methods used, not a statistically calibrated confidence interval.

Estimation Methods

Analyst price target:$184.82
Discounted cash flow (DCF):$88.32
Earnings multiple (P/E):$146.08
Graham growth formula:Not applicable to this type of company
Earnings power value (EPV):$106.08
Justified P/B:Not applicable to this type of company
Dividend discount (Gordon):$90.89
P/FFO, funds from operations:Not applicable to this type of company
Mid-cycle earnings:Not applicable to this type of company
Revenue multiple:Not applicable to this type of company
Last Earnings Surprise:+4.75%

Valuation Metrics

P/E Ratio

20.55

ROE

8.8%

P/B Ratio

1.91

P/FCF

-

Gross Margin

-

ROIC

4.8%

Profitability Radar

Value Creation (Economic Moat)

ROIC

4.8%

WACC

6.2%

ROIC − WACC

-1.4 pp

ROIC is below the cost of capital — the company is destroying value for every dollar invested.

Fundamental Analysis Criteria

Passed (17)

  • EPS shows upward trend
  • EPS CAGR 8.34%
  • Price CAGR 8.26%
  • P/B ratio 1.91
  • Debt/equity ratio
  • Operating margin 37.0%
  • Current ratio
  • Interest coverage
  • Debt/EBITDA
  • Return on tangible assets
  • Low reliance on intangibles
  • ROE 9.7%
  • Revenue growth 5Y 10.8%
  • Earnings surprise, average 3.0%
  • Earnings quality (operating cash flow / net income) 1.44
  • Net margin trend 28.5% vs 25.0%
  • Piotroski F-Score 5/9

Failed (6)

  • ROIC 4.8%
  • Positive free cash flow
  • Price below Graham Number
  • DCF valuation (Overvalued)
  • PEG ratio 2.29
  • Share dilution 5.2%

Unavailable (4)

  • Gross margin –
  • P/FCF –
  • Dividend payout –
  • CapEx intensity

Piotroski F-Score

5/9

Mixed signals: some areas need attention

ROA > 0
Operating cash flow > 0
ΔROA > 0
Cash flow > net income
Leverage ↓
Current ratio ↑
No dilution
Gross margin ↑
Asset turnover ↑

Earnings Quality

1.44

High quality: earnings backed by cash

Share Dilution

5.2%

Issuing new shares, diluting ownership

Institutional Holdings

Governance

Executive Team

NameTitleAge
Mr. John Kevin AkersCEO, President & Director62
Mr. Christopher T. ForsytheSenior VP & CFO53
Ms. Jessica W. Bateman PulliamSenior VP, General Counsel & Corporate Secretary47
Mr. John S. McDillExecutive Officer60
Ms. Michelle H. FaulkPrincipal Accounting Officer48
Mr. John Matt RobbinsSenior Vice President of Human Resources55
Mr. John A. ParisPresident of Mid-Tex Division61
Mr. Jeff D. MartinezSenior Vice President of Utility Operations56
Mr. Richard M. ThomasVP & Controller-
Ms. Jennifer WernickiDirector of Investor Relations & Assistant Treasurer-

Audit Risk

9

Board Risk

8

Compensation Risk

6

Shareholder Rights Risk

8

Documents

  • Annual Report (10-K)

    A yearly overview of the business, its financial results, and the risks it faces.

    Filed on 2025-11-14

    View document
  • Quarterly Report (10-Q)

    A snapshot of financial performance for the most recent three-month period.

    Filed on 2026-08-05

    View document
  • Current Report (8-K)

    An announcement of a major event, such as a leadership change or big news.

    Filed on 2026-10-09

    View document

via SEC EDGAR

Income History

via SEC EDGAR

Part 2 · The price and its context

This part shows how the price has behaved, not whether the company is worth owning. Inside: technical analysis, potential, historical drawdowns, gamma exposure.

Market Reaction Profile

How much ATO moves, measured on its daily prices.

VolatilityLow

More volatile than 1% of the tracked stocks (90-day volatility).

Volatility 30d
17.5%
Volatility 90d
16.6%
Beta vs S&P 500 (1y)
-0.20Correlation -0.16
Max drawdown (12m)
-18.7%
ATR (14d, % of price)
1.61%

Earnings reactions

How ATO moved around its past quarterly results.

Next earnings release

Nov 4, 2026 · In 11 days · Time not known

EPS estimate: 1.14Revenue estimate: $874M

What usually happens

  • Over the last 12 releases the stock moved a median of 1.6% the next day, up or down.
  • Next-day moves: up 7, down 5 (out of 12).
  • Of the 4 releases that beat estimates, the stock fell the next day after 2.

Release history

DateWhen EPS est.EPS actualSurprise Gap 1 day5 days
Aug 5, 2026After the close1.371.43+4.7% +0.7% -0.1% -1.5%
May 6, 2026After the close3.433.47+1.1% +1.1% -1.6% -2.6%
Feb 3, 2026After the close2.452.44-0.4% +1.4% +1.8% +3.2%
Nov 5, 2025After the close1.011.07+5.7% +2.6% +1.7% +3.0%
Aug 6, 2025After the close1.161.16+0.3% +2.5% +3.6% +6.3%
May 7, 2025After the closen/an/an/a+2.1% -0.9% -6.4%
Feb 4, 2025After the closen/an/an/a+1.1% +1.9% +1.9%
Nov 6, 2024After the closen/an/an/a+0.7% +1.8% +5.5%
Aug 7, 2024After the closen/an/an/a-0.3% -0.9% +0.4%
May 8, 2024After the closen/an/an/a-1.1% -0.7% -2.3%
Feb 6, 2024After the closen/an/an/a+1.3% +0.1% -0.1%
Nov 8, 2023After the closen/an/an/a+2.6% +1.8% +3.9%

Release dates from SEC 8-K filings.

Updated 10/24/2026

Historical statistics for educational purposes only. They are not forecasts and not investment advice.

Price reaction to the news

Latest news on ATO and what the price did next.

No positive or negative news on ATO has been archived yet.

Return of the stock minus return of SPY over the same days. A news item close to a price move did not necessarily cause it. Historical data for educational purposes only, not investment advice.

Latest News

Recent headlines for ATO.

No recent news for ATO.