Back to rankings

Bentley Systems, Incorporated (BSY)

NEUTRAL
TechnologySoftware - ApplicationUnited States

Fundamental

72

Price

$37.47

Market Cap

$11.20B

Part 1 · What the company is worth

Overview

Bentley Systems makes the software engineers use to design and manage physical infrastructure: roads, bridges, water networks, power grids, railways and buildings. Its programs let a team draft a bridge in 3D, model how a water network will behave, and keep a digital record of an asset over its decades of service. Customers are mostly engineering firms and the government agencies and utilities that own the infrastructure, in construction and heavy industry sectors where mistakes are expensive and projects take years.

How it makes money

Nearly all revenue now comes from subscriptions rather than one-time software licenses: 92% of 2025 revenue was subscription-based, paid on a recurring basis regardless of how much a customer actually uses the software that quarter. A small remaining share is perpetual licenses and professional services. Because engineering teams design entire projects inside Bentley's software and store years of asset data in it, subscriptions tend to renew rather than get cancelled once adopted.

Revenue by segment

Subscriptions92%

Recurring software licenses covering Bentley's design, modeling and infrastructure-management applications, the core and fastest-growing part of revenue.

Professional services6%

Implementation, training and consulting work sold alongside the software, a shrinking share of the total.

Perpetual licenses2%

One-time software license sales, a legacy model Bentley has largely phased out in favor of subscriptions.

Competitive moat

Switching costs · Narrow

An infrastructure project's design files, models and years of asset data live inside Bentley's software, and engineering teams are trained on its specific tools; moving a large, ongoing infrastructure program to a rival platform means retraining staff and migrating irreplaceable project history. The advantage is real but not absolute, since Autodesk and other established players compete directly for the same infrastructure-engineering budgets.

What drives demand

Moderately cyclical

A large share of Bentley's customers are governments and regulated utilities funding long-lived infrastructure programs, spending that is planned years ahead and less sensitive to a single bad quarter than typical corporate IT budgets. The remaining private-sector engineering and construction demand is more cyclical, rising and falling with construction activity and interest rates that affect project financing.

Key risks

  • Competition from larger rivals — Bentley competes against Autodesk and other large, well-resourced software companies in several of its core markets, including public-works and facilities design, which can pressure pricing and win rates.
  • Currency exposure from global operations — A significant share of revenue and costs is denominated in currencies other than the US dollar, so exchange-rate movements can affect reported results even when underlying demand is unchanged.
  • Dependence on continued subscription renewals — With subscriptions now the large majority of revenue, results depend on customers renewing rather than switching platforms or delaying software spending during a construction-sector downturn.

Customer concentration

Bentley does not disclose concentration among individual customers; its revenue is spread across a large number of engineering firms, government agencies and utilities worldwide, with no single buyer material to overall results.

The case for

Buyers argue that infrastructure spending by governments and utilities is a multi-decade need largely insulated from short-term economic swings, that the shift to subscriptions has made revenue more predictable and recurring, and that deeply embedded design software is hard to displace once an engineering team's projects and history live inside it.

The case against

Sellers worry that Autodesk and other well-capitalized competitors can keep chipping away at Bentley's core infrastructure-design markets, that a slowdown in construction activity or public infrastructure budgets would eventually show up in subscription growth, and that currency swings across Bentley's many international markets add volatility to reported results.

Written by the editors, published on August 18, 2026

Direct competitors

Who this company fights with for the same customers

No editorial profile for this company yet

No competitor list for this company yet.

Balance Sheet & Liquidity

Revenue

$1.60B

Trailing 12 months (through 6/30/2026)

Net Income

$290M

Trailing 12 months (through 6/30/2026)

Free Cash Flow

$520M

Total Equity

$1.19B

Total Liabilities

$2.37B

Current Ratio

0.59

Interest Coverage

19.70

Debt/EBITDA

2.71

Earnings Per Share

Revenue & Net Income

Free Cash Flow

Income Breakdown

Historical statement

Margins over time

Debt over time

How heavy the debt is

Growth grid

Growth — Revenue

Fair Value Estimation

Fairly Valued

Fair Value

$31.29

Current Price

$37.47

Margin of Safety

-19.7%

Fair Value Range

$20.34 - $42.25

Estimation Methods

Analyst Target:$44.47
DCF:-
PE-based:$21.52
Graham Growth:$29.81
EPV:$9.41
Analyst Consensus:Strong Buy (16B / 5H / 0S)
Last Earnings Surprise:+9.65%

Valuation Metrics

P/E Ratio

41.87

ROE

23.4%

P/B Ratio

9.11

P/FCF

21.96

Gross Margin

81.8%

ROIC

11.5%

Profitability Radar

Value Creation (Economic Moat)

ROIC

11.5%

WACC

9.0%

ROIC − WACC

+2.5 pp

ROIC exceeds the cost of capital — the company is creating value for shareholders.

Fundamental Analysis Criteria

Passed (20)

  • EPS shows upward trend
  • EPS CAGR 8.19%
  • ROIC 11.5%
  • Gross Margin 81.8%
  • P/FCF 21.96
  • Debt/Equity ratio
  • Operating Margin 23.6%
  • Positive Free Cash Flow
  • CapEx intensity
  • Interest Coverage
  • Debt/EBITDA
  • Return on Tangible Assets
  • ROE 24.1%
  • Revenue Growth 5Y 13.4%
  • Analyst Consensus 76% Buy
  • Earnings Surprise avg 3.9%
  • Earnings Quality (OCF/NI) 1.80
  • Share Dilution 0.2%
  • Net Margin Trend 18.1% vs 17.9%
  • Piotroski F-Score 9/9

Failed (7)

  • Price CAGR -1.46%
  • P/B Ratio 9.11
  • Current Ratio
  • Low reliance on intangibles
  • Price below Graham Number
  • DCF valuation (Unknown)
  • PEG Ratio 2.64

Unavailable (1)

  • Dividend Payout NaN%

Piotroski F-Score

9/9

Strong financial health

score
criteria

Earnings Quality

1.80

High quality: earnings backed by cash

Share Dilution

0.2%

Share count is stable

Governance

Executive Team

NameTitleAge
Mr. Gregory S. BentleyPresident & Executive Chairman of the Board69
Mr. Nicholas H. CuminsCEO & Director48
Mr. Keith Arthur BentleyFounder, Technology Advisor, Executive VP & Director66
Mr. Barry Joe Bentley Ph.D.Co-Founder & Director59
Mr. Werner Andre CPAChief Financial Officer54
Mr. James LeeChief Operating Officer45
Mr. David R. Shaman J.D.Chief Legal Officer & Secretary59
Mr. Thomas F. TrimbackChief Accounting Officer & Global Controller-
Mr. Julien MoutteChief Technology Officer46
Ms. Ruth SleeterChief Information Officer-

Audit Risk

2

Board Risk

10

Compensation Risk

7

Shareholder Rights Risk

10

Part 2 · The price and when to enter

This part won't tell you whether the company is worth owning: it helps you choose when to buy it, once the fundamentals have convinced you. Inside: technical analysis, potential, historical drawdowns, gamma exposure.

Latest News

Recent headlines for BSY, sourced from Markets Gazette.

No recent news for BSY.