Back to rankings

Duke Energy Corp (DUK)

Overvalued
UtilitiesUtilities - Regulated ElectricUnited States

Fundamental

65

Price

$124.98

Market Cap

$94.09B

Part 1 · What the company is worth

Overview

Duke Energy is an integrated electric and gas utility serving approximately 8.4 million retail electricity customers and 1.7 million natural gas customers across the Carolinas, Florida, Indiana, Ohio, and Kentucky. The company generates, transmits, and distributes electricity and natural gas through regulated operations where customers pay approved tariffs set by state public utility commissions.

How it makes money

Duke Energy generates revenue through regulated utility rates approved by state public utility commissions in each jurisdiction. Customers pay for electricity and natural gas consumption plus recovery of Duke's operating costs, maintenance, and capital investments. The rate-recovery mechanism ensures that Duke can recover the costs of its infrastructure investments in generation, transmission, and distribution assets and earn a state-approved return on invested capital.

Revenue by segment

Electric Utilities and Infrastructure92.5%

Generates and distributes electricity through regulated operations to 8.4 million retail customers in North Carolina, South Carolina, Florida, Indiana, and Ohio. Includes both traditional power plants and renewable generation capacity, with revenue from residential, commercial, and industrial customer classes.

Gas Utilities and Infrastructure7.5%

Distributes natural gas to 1.7 million retail customers through regulated operations in North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Ohio, and Kentucky, including Piedmont Natural Gas and other gas utility subsidiaries. Also invests in natural gas storage and midstream pipeline operations.

Competitive moat

Switching costs · Wide

Duke Energy's moat is based on exclusive regulatory franchises (service territories) granted by state governments that prevent competitors from operating in its markets. The regulated utility business model with state-approved rate recovery creates high switching costs—customers cannot choose an alternative electricity or gas provider within Duke's service territories. The company's established infrastructure, decades of regulatory relationships, and state regulatory approval requirements create durable barriers to entry that protect Duke's market position.

What drives demand

Moderately cyclical

Duke Energy's demand is moderately cyclical, influenced by seasonal temperature fluctuations (heating in winter, cooling in summer) and economic growth cycles affecting commercial and industrial customers. However, secular growth drivers are significant: electrification of buildings and vehicles, artificial intelligence and data center expansion (CEO projects demand growth at 10 times the historic pace), and population growth in Duke's service territories. Data centers alone are expected to represent nearly half of Duke's incremental capacity needs through the early 2030s, providing multi-year demand visibility.

Key risks

  • Extreme weather and hurricane exposure — Duke Energy faces material risk from hurricane and extreme weather events. In 2024, Hurricanes Helene, Milton, and Debby generated total restoration costs of $2.4 billion to $2.9 billion. The uncertain nature and timing of potential increases in frequency and severity of extreme weather events make estimating future financial impact difficult. Regulatory recovery of extraordinary storm costs is not guaranteed, and more severe weather could materially impact financial results if it occurs with greater frequency.
  • Regulatory and rate recovery risk — Duke's profitability depends on approval by state public utility commissions of rate increases and recovery of capital investments. Changes in regulatory policy, political environment, or regulator composition could limit Duke's ability to recover all costs or earn state-authorized returns. EPA rules and environmental regulations continue to evolve and could impose material new costs with uncertain recovery mechanisms.
  • Coal ash compliance and environmental liabilities — The EPA's 2024 Coal Combustion Residuals (CCR) Rule significantly expanded coal ash regulatory requirements for inactive surface impoundments at retired generating facilities. The extent and timing of costs and liabilities to comply with federal and state coal ash remediation requirements are uncertain and difficult to estimate. Regulatory recovery of these compliance costs is not certain.
  • Rising interest rates and financing costs — Duke Energy is highly capital intensive and relies on debt financing for its $83 billion capital plan to fund infrastructure modernization. Rising interest rates increase borrowing costs and reduce returns on capital-intensive projects. Interest expense increased approximately 7% year-over-year through 2025, compressing financial returns during a period requiring substantial capital deployment.

The case for

Buyers argue that Duke Energy is positioned for strong earnings growth driven by secular demand tailwinds—particularly AI and data center expansion expected to grow at 10 times the historic pace—coupled with an $83+ billion capital deployment plan earning regulated returns. The company has a 98-year history of consecutive annual dividend payments and offers a 3.4% dividend yield, with management guiding 5-7% adjusted EPS growth through 2030. Regulatory environments across Duke's jurisdictions remain constructive, supporting capital investment recovery and rate increases. The regulated utility model provides stable, predictable cash flows with minimal competitive pressure and high barriers to entry.

The case against

Sellers fear that Duke Energy's material exposure to extreme weather is escalating. Three consecutive hurricanes in 2024 (Helene, Milton, Debby) cost $2.4-2.9 billion in restoration, and climate change suggests increasing frequency and severity ahead. Rising interest rates compress returns on capital-intensive investments at a time when Duke is dramatically increasing capex. Inflation has driven material and labor costs higher, eroding margins. Regulatory approval for rate increases is not guaranteed, especially given political pressure on affordability. Coal ash compliance costs remain uncertain and could exceed regulatory recovery assumptions. Finally, the ambitious data center demand growth is not assured—infrastructure buildout delays, power cooling constraints, or grid capacity bottlenecks could materially delay or reduce realization of this secular growth thesis.

Generated with artificial intelligence on September 21, 2026, shared with all users

Direct competitors

Who this company fights with for the same customers

Compare

Generated with artificial intelligence on September 18, 2026, shared with all users

P/E: 23.8Score: 58Market cap: $101.90B

Southern is the closest structural twin to Duke: a vertically integrated regulated electric and gas utility holding company across the US Southeast, competing for the same industrial and data-center load growth and the same state rate-case outcomes.

P/E: 20.8Score: 68Market cap: $163.24B

Through Florida Power & Light, NextEra serves roughly 12 million people in Florida, the same state where Duke Energy Florida operates, and both also sell wholesale power and compete to build large-scale generation.

P/E: 19.3Score: 55Market cap: $55.90B

Dominion serves 3.6 million electric customers in Virginia, North Carolina and South Carolina, overlapping Duke's Carolinas heartland in the same regulatory arenas and the same wholesale power market.

P/E: 19.2Score: 59Market cap: $69.18B

AEP is a comparably sized regulated utility with 5.6 million customers in 11 states, including the Ohio, Indiana and Kentucky markets where Duke's Midwest utilities operate and where both bid for the same wholesale and large-customer supply.

P/E: 16.3Score: 45Market cap: $44.51B

Exelon is the other large multi-state regulated electric and gas utility group in the US, competing with Duke for the same regulated rate-base growth, the same transmission investment and the same income-oriented utility investors.

Balance Sheet & Liquidity

Revenue

$32.52B

Trailing 12 months (through 3/31/2026)

Net Income

$5.14B

Trailing 12 months (through 3/31/2026)

Free Cash Flow

$-1.69B

Total Equity

$51.84B

Total Liabilities

$142.72B

Current Ratio

0.66

Interest Coverage

2.43

Debt/EBITDA

5.53

Earnings Per Share

Revenue & Net Income

Free Cash Flow

Income Breakdown

Historical statement

Margins over time

Debt over time

How heavy the debt is

Growth grid

Growth — Revenue

Fair Value Estimation

Regulated utilityOvervalued

Fair Value

$99.04

Current Price

$124.98

Margin of Safety

-26.2%

Fair Value Range

$66.82 - $131.26

Spread across the valuation methods used, not a statistically calibrated confidence interval.

Estimation Methods

Analyst price target:$132.83
Discounted cash flow (DCF):$35.20
Earnings multiple (P/E):$113.94
Graham growth formula:Not applicable to this type of company
Earnings power value (EPV):$116.96
Justified P/B:Not applicable to this type of company
Dividend discount (Gordon):$93.69
P/FFO, funds from operations:Not applicable to this type of company
Mid-cycle earnings:Not applicable to this type of company
Revenue multiple:Not applicable to this type of company
Last Earnings Surprise:+8.50%

Valuation Metrics

P/E Ratio

19.17

ROE

9.6%

P/B Ratio

1.79

P/FCF

-

Gross Margin

-

ROIC

4.0%

Profitability Radar

Value Creation (Economic Moat)

ROIC

4.0%

WACC

5.7%

ROIC − WACC

-1.6 pp

ROIC is below the cost of capital — the company is destroying value for every dollar invested.

Fundamental Analysis Criteria

Passed (17)

  • EPS shows upward trend
  • EPS CAGR 9.76%
  • P/B ratio 1.79
  • Debt/equity ratio
  • Operating margin 27.7%
  • Interest coverage
  • Debt/EBITDA
  • Return on tangible assets
  • Low reliance on intangibles
  • ROE 9.9%
  • Revenue growth 5Y 6.2%
  • Earnings surprise, average 3.3%
  • PEG ratio 0.65
  • Earnings quality (operating cash flow / net income) 2.27
  • Share dilution -0.6%
  • Net margin trend 15.8% vs 15.5%
  • Piotroski F-Score 6/9

Failed (6)

  • Price CAGR 4.42%
  • ROIC 4.0%
  • Positive free cash flow
  • Current ratio
  • Price below Graham Number
  • DCF valuation (Overvalued)

Unavailable (4)

  • Gross margin –
  • P/FCF –
  • Dividend payout –
  • CapEx intensity

Piotroski F-Score

6/9

Mixed signals: some areas need attention

ROA > 0
Operating cash flow > 0
ΔROA > 0
Cash flow > net income
Leverage ↓
Current ratio ↑
No dilution
Gross margin ↑
Asset turnover ↑

Earnings Quality

2.27

High quality: earnings backed by cash

Share Dilution

-0.6%

Buying back shares. Shareholder friendly

Institutional Holdings

Governance

Executive Team

NameTitleAge
Mr. Harry K. SiderisPresident, CEO & Director55
Mr. Brian D. SavoyExecutive VP & CFO50
Mr. T. Preston Gillespie Jr.Executive Vice President of Nuclear Program Strategy62
Mr. Kodwo Ghartey-Tagoe J.D.Executive VP & CEO of Duke Energy Carolinas & Natural Gas Business62
Mr. Louis E. RenjelExecutive VP, CEO of Duke Energy Florida & Midwest and Chief Corporate Affairs Officer51
Ms. Abigail L. MotsingerSenior VP, Chief Accounting Officer & Controller41
Mr. Richard DonaldsonSenior VP & Chief Information Officer-
Ms. Bonnie B. TitoneExecutive VP & Chief Administrative Officer51
Mr. Mike SwitzerVice President of Investor Relations-
Mr. Alexander Robert GlennExecutive VP & Chief Legal Officer60

Audit Risk

4

Board Risk

3

Compensation Risk

2

Shareholder Rights Risk

4

Documents

  • Annual Report (10-K)

    A yearly overview of the business, its financial results, and the risks it faces.

    Filed on 2026-02-26

    View document
  • Quarterly Report (10-Q)

    A snapshot of financial performance for the most recent three-month period.

    Filed on 2026-08-04

    View document
  • Current Report (8-K)

    An announcement of a major event, such as a leadership change or big news.

    Filed on 2026-09-25

    View document

via SEC EDGAR

Income History

via SEC EDGAR

Part 2 · The price and its context

This part shows how the price has behaved, not whether the company is worth owning. Inside: technical analysis, potential, historical drawdowns, gamma exposure.

Market Reaction Profile

How much DUK moves, measured on its daily prices.

VolatilityLow

More volatile than 4% of the tracked stocks (90-day volatility).

Volatility 30d
18.7%
Volatility 90d
18.5%
Beta vs S&P 500 (1y)
-0.31Correlation -0.24
Max drawdown (12m)
-15.2%
ATR (14d, % of price)
1.59%

Earnings reactions

How DUK moved around its past quarterly results.

Next earnings release

Nov 5, 2026 · In 12 days · Before the open

EPS estimate: 1.86Revenue estimate: $9.0B

What usually happens

  • Over the last 12 releases the stock moved a median of 1.6% the next day, up or down.
  • Next-day moves: up 6, down 6 (out of 12).

Release history

DateWhen EPS est.EPS actualSurprise Gap 1 day5 days
Aug 3, 2026After the close1.321.43+8.5% -0.6% 0.0% -2.5%
May 4, 2026After the close1.891.93+2.2% +1.1% +0.1% -2.0%
Feb 9, 2026After the close1.501.50-0.1% +0.4% +1.6% +4.1%
Nov 6, 2025After the close1.771.81+2.5% +0.1% -0.3% -0.3%
Aug 5, 2025During the sessionn/an/an/a+2.3% -0.1% +1.1%
May 5, 2025After the closen/an/an/a+1.0% +1.8% -4.1%
Feb 12, 2025After the closen/an/an/a-0.9% -2.1% -2.8%
Nov 6, 2024After the closen/an/an/a-0.9% -2.2% -2.0%
Aug 5, 2024After the closen/an/an/a+1.3% +1.7% +2.1%
May 6, 2024After the closen/an/an/a+0.6% +1.8% +2.5%
Feb 7, 2024After the closen/an/an/a-0.8% -3.0% -4.4%
Nov 1, 2023After the closen/an/an/a0.0% +0.4% -1.3%

Release dates from SEC 8-K filings.

Updated 10/24/2026

Historical statistics for educational purposes only. They are not forecasts and not investment advice.

Price reaction to the news

Latest news on DUK and what the price did next.

Return of the stock minus return of SPY over the same days. A news item close to a price move did not necessarily cause it. Historical data for educational purposes only, not investment advice.

Latest News

Recent headlines for DUK.

  • 8/10/2026NEGATIVE
    Duke Energy Seeks $1.75 Billion From Equity Units Sale

    Duke Energy Corp. announced plans to raise approximately $1.75 billion through the sale of equity units. The primary objective of this capital raise is to facilitate debt reduction. While raising capital can strengthen a company's balance sheet, issuing new equity can dilute existing shareholders' ownership stake and potentially pressure the stock price in the short term. Investors will monitor how effectively the company utilizes these funds to improve its financial leverage.

  • 6/3/2026POSITIVE
    Duke CEO Sees AI Fueling Power Growth at 10 Times Historic Pace

    Duke Energy's CEO anticipates a tenfold increase in power demand growth over the coming decades, primarily driven by the burgeoning AI data center sector and the ongoing electrification of the economy. This forecast suggests a significant expansion opportunity for the utility company, potentially leading to increased infrastructure investment and revenue streams. Investors may view this as a strong positive signal for Duke Energy's future growth prospects, as it positions the company to capitalize on major secular trends.

  • 4/25/2026POSITIVE
    Utility giant Duke Energy plans to spend industry record $103 billion on growth as data centers and affordability take center stage

    Duke Energy has announced an ambitious capital investment plan of $103 billion, a record for the utility industry, to fuel future growth. This significant expenditure is primarily driven by the burgeoning demand from major technology companies like Amazon, Microsoft, Google, and Meta, which are expanding their data center operations within Duke's service territories. The company's strategy aims to meet this escalating energy need while also focusing on affordability for consumers. For investors, this signals a strong commitment to long-term expansion and a strategic positioning to capitalize on the digital infrastructure boom, potentially leading to sustained revenue growth and enhanced shareholder value.

  • 4/20/2026NEUTRAL
    Duke Energy: 100-Year Dividend Track Record — But $103B Capex Is Compressing The Credit Cushion

    Duke Energy, a prominent utility provider, boasts an impressive 100-year history of consistent dividend payments. However, the company's ambitious $103 billion capital expenditure plan over the next decade is raising concerns about its creditworthiness. This significant investment is aimed at modernizing infrastructure and expanding renewable energy capacity. While the capex is crucial for future growth and regulatory compliance, it is currently compressing the company's credit cushion, potentially impacting its financial flexibility and debt ratings. Investors are weighing the long-term growth prospects against the short-to-medium term financial strain.