Edison International (EIX)
UndervaluedFundamental
74
Price
$57.35
Market Cap
$22.01B
Part 1 · What the company is worth
Overview
Edison International is a holding company whose primary asset is Southern California Edison Company (SCE), a regulated electric utility serving approximately 15 million people across central, coastal, and southern California. SCE operates the transmission and distribution infrastructure across a 50,000-square-mile service territory and is the sole provider of electricity distribution in its franchise area.
How it makes money
SCE operates under a cost-of-service regulatory model overseen by the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC), where the company recovers operating expenses, fuel costs, maintenance and labor expenses, capital investments through depreciation allowances, and an authorized return on invested equity. Revenue comes from rates charged to residential, commercial, and industrial customers, plus ancillary operating revenues from services.
Revenue by segment
Business, retail, institutional, and small-to-mid commercial customers including offices, healthcare, hospitality, and local services served across the SCE service territory.
Household customers and residential end-users across the service territory, representing the largest customer count segment.
Ancillary revenues from miscellaneous services, public authorities, agricultural and other customer classes.
Competitive moat
Scale · WideEdison's competitive moat stems from its exclusive regulated monopoly franchise to serve electricity to its territory, creating an insurmountable barrier to entry. The business requires billions of dollars in capital investment to build transmission and distribution infrastructure, creating natural monopoly economics. CPUC regulatory oversight ensures cost recovery and a predictable return on invested capital, protecting the business from commodity price fluctuations and competitive pressures. The company's scale enables economies in procuring renewables and integrating storage across a large customer base.
What drives demand
Moderately cyclicalEdison's demand exhibits moderate cyclicality with defensive characteristics of regulated utilities, but with meaningful sensitivity to economic conditions. Residential demand is relatively stable and defensive, driven by population growth, weather patterns for heating and cooling, and electrification trends (electric vehicles, heat pumps). Commercial and industrial demand is more cyclical, correlating with regional economic activity and business expansion. Electrification of transportation and building systems in California, combined with growing data center demand, provides structural tailwinds. Electricity demand in SCE's service territory is projected to increase nearly 80% by 2045, providing a multi-decade growth runway.
Key risks
- Wildfire Liability and Litigation Exposure — SCE faces significant uninsured wildfire liability exposure with approximately 30,000 pending claims related to past wildfire events. California's inverse condemnation legal framework historically held utilities liable for damages regardless of fault. Recent legislative changes (SB 492) omitted a proposed $6 billion per-incident liability cap that investors had anticipated, leaving SCE exposed to substantial potential settlements and litigation costs that may not be fully recoverable through customer rates.
- Regulatory and Rate Recovery Risk — SCE's financial performance depends heavily on CPUC decisions regarding rate recovery, capital expenditure approvals, and authorized return on equity. Changes in regulatory policy, adoption of performance-based rate making, or regulatory restrictions on wildfire mitigation measures (such as Public Safety Power Shutoff limitations) could reduce the company's ability to recover costs or achieve its authorized returns, materially impacting earnings.
- Operational and Climate Risk — SCE's service territory faces escalating wildfire risk due to climate change, drought conditions, and vegetation patterns, driving increasing infrastructure maintenance and hardening costs. Extreme weather events and changing precipitation patterns affect both demand patterns and operational safety requirements, potentially creating unbudgeted expenses that may not be fully recoverable through rates.
- Geographic and Policy Concentration in California — SCE's entire business is concentrated in California, exposing the company to California-specific regulatory, legislative, and policy changes. California's aggressive clean energy mandates and electrification goals, while providing long-term growth opportunities, require significant capital investment that depends on regulatory approval and cost recovery mechanisms that could be modified by future legislative action.
The case for
Buyers argue that Edison International is a defensive, regulated utility positioned at the nexus of California's clean energy transition and electrification mega-trend. The company has a contracted capital investment plan of $38-41 billion for 2026-2030, supporting projected 7% annual core earnings growth through 2028. With electricity demand projected to grow nearly 80% by 2045 and California mandating carbon neutrality by 2045, Edison's exclusive service territory provides a structural growth tailwind. Data center expansion, electric vehicle adoption, and heat pump electrification are all driving incremental electricity demand. Edison's 7,000 MW of generation and storage assets position it as a clean energy beneficiary during the transition. The regulated utility model provides highly predictable cash flows and dividends, with CPUC cost-recovery mechanisms limiting downside risks.
The case against
Sellers fear that Edison International's exposure to wildfire liability in California poses an existential threat to shareholder returns, amplified by recent legislative changes that removed expected protections. The company carries 30,000 pending wildfire claims with uncertain settlement outcomes and uninsured exposure. Recent stock declines of 23% on legislative disappointment signal that liability costs could consume earnings growth from its capital investment program. Regulatory risk is acute: the CPUC could restrict cost recovery for wildfire mitigation spending, limit rate increases, or require performance-based metrics that penalize shareholders. Additionally, electrification of transportation and buildings may not proceed as quickly or uniformly as utilities expect, potentially stranding capital investments. The company's entire business is geographically concentrated in California, exposing it to state-specific policy reversals. Finally, the regulatory model itself faces erosion risk as populist or environmental constituencies push for more aggressive rate regulation and decoupling of utility earnings from capital deployment.
Generated with artificial intelligence on September 21, 2026, shared with all users
Direct competitors
Who this company fights with for the same customers
Generated with artificial intelligence on September 18, 2026, shared with all users
The other large California investor-owned electric utility, delivering power to northern and central California households under the same CPUC rate-setting and the same wildfire-liability regime.
Through San Diego Gas & Electric it runs the regulated electric business immediately south of Edison, serving San Diego County and part of southern Orange County under the same California regulator.
Sells rooftop solar and home batteries to the same California households, replacing with self-generated power the kilowatt-hours those homes would otherwise buy from Edison.
A public joint-powers agency that buys and sells the electricity itself to about one million households and businesses inside Southern California Edison's own service territory, taking the generation portion of the bill that Edison would otherwise supply.
The municipal utility serving the City of Los Angeles, the large customer base carved out of the middle of Edison's Southern California territory, and the model that neighbouring cities point to whenever they debate leaving Edison.
Balance Sheet & Liquidity
Revenue
$19.61B
Trailing 12 months (through 3/31/2026)
Net Income
$3.55B
Trailing 12 months (through 3/31/2026)
Free Cash Flow
$-715M
Total Equity
$17.58B
Total Liabilities
$74.77B
Current Ratio
0.74
Interest Coverage
3.42
Debt/EBITDA
4.13
Earnings Per Share
Revenue & Net Income
Free Cash Flow
Income Breakdown
Historical statement
Margins over time
Debt over time
How heavy the debt is
Growth grid
Growth — Revenue
Fair Value Estimation
Fair Value
$80.12
Current Price
$57.35
Margin of Safety
+28.4%
Fair Value Range
$52.08 - $108.17
Spread across the valuation methods used, not a statistically calibrated confidence interval.
Estimation Methods
Valuation Metrics
P/E Ratio
6.23
ROE
25.4%
P/B Ratio
1.27
P/FCF
-
Gross Margin
-
ROIC
5.6%
Profitability Radar
Value Creation (Economic Moat)
ROIC
5.6%
WACC
4.6%
ROIC − WACC
+1.0 pp
ROIC exceeds the cost of capital — the company is creating value for shareholders.
Fundamental Analysis Criteria
Passed (18)
- EPS shows upward trend
- EPS CAGR 7.19%
- ROIC 5.6%
- P/B ratio 1.27
- Operating margin 30.8%
- Interest coverage
- Debt/EBITDA
- Return on tangible assets
- Low reliance on intangibles
- Price below Graham Number
- ROE 22.7%
- Revenue growth 5Y 7.3%
- Earnings surprise, average 21.3%
- PEG ratio 0.14
- Earnings quality (operating cash flow / net income) 1.69
- Share dilution -0.5%
- Net margin trend 18.1% vs 15.8%
- Piotroski F-Score 5/9
Failed (5)
- Price CAGR -2.58%
- Debt/equity ratio
- Positive free cash flow
- Current ratio
- DCF valuation (Overvalued)
Unavailable (4)
- Gross margin –
- P/FCF –
- Dividend payout –
- CapEx intensity
Piotroski F-Score
Mixed signals: some areas need attention
Earnings Quality
High quality: earnings backed by cash
Share Dilution
Buying back shares. Shareholder friendly
Institutional Holdings
Governance
Executive Team
| Name | Title | Age |
|---|---|---|
| Dr. Pedro J. Pizarro Ph.D. | President, CEO & Director | 59 |
| Ms. Chonda Jordan Nwamu Esq. | Executive VP & General Counsel | 54 |
| Ms. Maria C. Rigatti | Executive Vice President of Finance & Risk Policy | 61 |
| Ms. Jill C. Anderson | Executive VP & COO - SCE | 44 |
| Mr. Aaron D. Moss | Executive VP & CFO | 54 |
| Ms. Kara Gostenhofer Ryan | VP, Chief Accounting Officer & Controller | 41 |
| Mr. Sam Ramraj | Vice President of Investor Relations | - |
| Ms. Marta I. Carreira Slabe | VP & Chief Ethics & Compliance Officer | - |
| Ms. Bella Amani Foley | VP & Chief Communications Officer | - |
| Ms. Natalie K. Schilling | Senior VP & Chief Human Resources Officer | 65 |
Audit Risk
5
Board Risk
1
Compensation Risk
8
Shareholder Rights Risk
1
Documents
- View document
Annual Report (10-K)
A yearly overview of the business, its financial results, and the risks it faces.
Filed on 2026-02-18
- View document
Quarterly Report (10-Q)
A snapshot of financial performance for the most recent three-month period.
Filed on 2026-07-30
- View document
Current Report (8-K)
An announcement of a major event, such as a leadership change or big news.
Filed on 2026-07-31
via SEC EDGAR
Income History
via SEC EDGAR
Part 2 · The price and its context
This part shows how the price has behaved, not whether the company is worth owning. Inside: technical analysis, potential, historical drawdowns, gamma exposure.
Market Reaction Profile
How much EIX moves, measured on its daily prices.
More volatile than 82% of the tracked stocks (90-day volatility).
- Volatility 30d
- 21.6%
- Volatility 90d
- 55.7%
- Beta vs S&P 500 (1y)
- 0.00Correlation 0.00
- Max drawdown (12m)
- -36.0%
- ATR (14d, % of price)
- 2.92%
Earnings reactions
How EIX moved around its past quarterly results.
Next earnings release
Oct 29, 2026 · In 5 days · After the close
EPS estimate: 1.81Revenue estimate: $5.3B
What usually happens
- Over the last 12 releases the stock moved a median of 1.6% the next day, up or down.
- Next-day moves: up 7, down 4 (out of 12).
- Of the 4 releases that beat estimates, the stock fell the next day after 2.
Release history
| Date | When | EPS est. | EPS actual | Surprise | Gap | 1 day | 5 days |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 2026 | After the close | 1.17 | 1.54 | +31.1% | -3.5% | -6.8% | -14.6% |
| Apr 28, 2026 | After the close | 1.33 | 1.42 | +7.1% | -2.0% | 0.0% | +1.4% |
| Feb 18, 2026 | After the close | 1.33 | 1.86 | +40.3% | +1.9% | +4.2% | +7.9% |
| Oct 28, 2025 | After the close | 2.20 | 2.34 | +6.5% | -1.9% | -1.2% | -0.6% |
| Jul 31, 2025 | After the close | n/a | n/a | n/a | +0.2% | +1.9% | +5.4% |
| Apr 29, 2025 | After the close | n/a | n/a | n/a | -1.2% | -8.9% | -6.6% |
| Feb 27, 2025 | After the close | n/a | n/a | n/a | +0.7% | +6.0% | +7.3% |
| Oct 29, 2024 | After the close | n/a | n/a | n/a | -1.1% | +0.1% | -1.4% |
| Jul 25, 2024 | After the close | n/a | n/a | n/a | +0.7% | +2.7% | +6.8% |
| Apr 30, 2024 | After the close | n/a | n/a | n/a | -0.7% | +0.3% | +4.0% |
| Feb 22, 2024 | After the close | n/a | n/a | n/a | +1.1% | +1.2% | +0.9% |
| Nov 1, 2023 | After the close | n/a | n/a | n/a | +0.1% | -0.5% | -1.6% |
Release dates from SEC 8-K filings.
Updated 10/24/2026
Historical statistics for educational purposes only. They are not forecasts and not investment advice.
Price reaction to the news
Latest news on EIX and what the price did next.
- 9/22/2026NegativeEdison CEO Warns Wildfire Impasse Risks Higher Customer Bills
Published while the US market was open: the move of that day cannot be split into before and after the news, so no figure is shown.
Return of the stock minus return of SPY over the same days. A news item close to a price move did not necessarily cause it. Historical data for educational purposes only, not investment advice.
Latest News
Recent headlines for EIX.
- 9/22/2026NEGATIVEEdison CEO Warns Wildfire Impasse Risks Higher Customer Bills
Edison International faces potential credit rating downgrades to junk status if California fails to pass wildfire legislation, warned the CEO of its parent company. This downgrade could lead to hundreds of millions of dollars in additional costs for Southern California Edison customers. The lack of legislative action to address wildfire liabilities creates significant financial uncertainty for the utility, potentially impacting its ability to secure financing and increasing operational expenses. Investors should monitor legislative developments closely, as a negative outcome could lead to sustained pressure on the company's stock.