Back to rankings

Roper Technologies, Inc. (ROP)

Fair Value
TechnologySoftware - ApplicationUnited States

Fundamental

72

Price

$438.14

Market Cap

$37.85B

Part 1 · What the company is worth

Overview

Roper Technologies is a holding company that owns dozens of software and technology businesses, each built or bought because it leads a small, specialized market rather than because it fits a common product line. A hospital lab-management system, an insurance-industry data network, a K-12 school-administration platform and a medical ultrasound device maker can all sit inside Roper at once. The parent provides capital and acquisition discipline; each business runs its own niche largely on its own.

How it makes money

Most of Roper's businesses sell software by subscription, generating recurring revenue that renews year after year rather than one-time sales. Growth comes less from selling more to the same customers than from buying new niche-leading businesses outright: Roper has deployed roughly $10 billion on acquisitions in the past three years alone. Because each acquired business tends to already dominate its narrow market, Roper can raise prices gradually without losing much volume to competitors.

Revenue by segment

Application Software56.7%

Vertical-market software for law firms, hospitals, schools, insurers and government agencies, including businesses like Deltek and Vertafore.

Technology Enabled Products23%

Engineered hardware such as water-meter and medical-imaging devices, including businesses like Neptune and Verathon.

Network Software20.3%

Software that connects buyers and sellers within an industry, such as freight-matching and insurance data networks, including businesses like DAT and iPipeline.

Competitive moat

Scale · Narrow

The advantage is not a single technology moat but a repeatable process: decades of experience buying, pricing and running niche-leading software businesses without disrupting what made each one dominant. That discipline is hard for a competitor to replicate quickly, but each individual business's own competitive position varies, and some niches are more contestable than others.

What drives demand

Moderately cyclical

Subscription software revenue in end markets like legal, healthcare and education administration is fairly insulated from the economic cycle since these are ongoing operational needs, not discretionary purchases. The more cyclical piece is Technology Enabled Products, where equipment sales can slow with customer capital budgets, and the pace of new acquisitions itself depends on capital-market conditions.

Key risks

  • Growth depends on continued acquisitions — A meaningful part of Roper's growth strategy relies on finding, financing and integrating new acquisitions; if suitable targets become scarcer or more expensive, growth could slow.
  • Integration risk across many businesses — Roper must integrate acquired companies without disrupting what made them successful; a poorly integrated or overpaid acquisition can drag down returns for the whole portfolio.
  • Regulatory approval risk for deals — Larger acquisitions require regulatory approvals that are not guaranteed; a blocked or delayed deal can force Roper to redeploy capital elsewhere or forgo an intended purchase.

Customer concentration

Roper does not disclose material customer concentration; revenue is spread across dozens of independently run businesses each serving its own set of niche customers, so no single buyer is significant company-wide.

The case for

Buyers argue that Roper's shift toward Application and Network Software raises the recurring, high-margin share of revenue every year, that its niche-market focus keeps competition muted in most of its businesses, and that a decades-long record of disciplined acquisitions is a repeatable engine rather than a one-time trick.

The case against

Sellers worry that a growth model built on paying up for niche-leading businesses gets harder to sustain as good targets become scarcer or pricier, that a conglomerate this diversified is difficult for outsiders to fully understand or value, and that any single large, poorly integrated acquisition could quietly weigh on returns for years.

Written by the editors, published on August 18, 2026

Direct competitors

Who this company fights with for the same customers

No editorial profile for this company yet

No competitor list for this company yet.

Balance Sheet & Liquidity

Revenue

$8.28B

Trailing 12 months (through 6/30/2026)

Net Income

$2.50B

Trailing 12 months (through 6/30/2026)

Free Cash Flow

-

Total Equity

$19.88B

Total Liabilities

$14.70B

Current Ratio

0.55

Interest Coverage

5.88

Debt/EBITDA

3.61

Earnings Per Share

Revenue & Net Income

Free Cash Flow

Income Breakdown

Historical statement

Margins over time

Debt over time

How heavy the debt is

Growth grid

Growth — Revenue

Fair Value Estimation

General caseFairly Valued

Fair Value

$405.24

Current Price

$438.14

Margin of Safety

-8.1%

Fair Value Range

$286.62 - $523.85

Spread across the valuation methods used, not a statistically calibrated confidence interval.

Estimation Methods

Analyst price target:$439.43
Discounted cash flow (DCF):$359.88
Earnings multiple (P/E):$388.10
Graham growth formula:$615.09
Earnings power value (EPV):$215.16
Justified P/B:$374.46
Dividend discount (Gordon):$77.53
P/FFO, funds from operations:$393.85
Mid-cycle earnings:$508.71
Revenue multiple:$443.77
Last Earnings Surprise:+0.81%

Valuation Metrics

P/E Ratio

18.15

ROE

7.7%

P/B Ratio

2.32

P/FCF

-

Gross Margin

69.5%

ROIC

5.8%

Profitability Radar

Value Creation (Economic Moat)

ROIC

5.8%

WACC

7.0%

ROIC − WACC

-1.3 pp

ROIC is below the cost of capital — the company is destroying value for every dollar invested.

Fundamental Analysis Criteria

Passed (18)

  • EPS shows upward trend
  • EPS CAGR 9.80%
  • Price CAGR 7.18%
  • ROIC 5.8%
  • Gross margin 69.5%
  • P/B ratio 2.32
  • Debt/equity ratio
  • Operating margin 28.0%
  • Interest coverage
  • Debt/EBITDA
  • Return on tangible assets
  • ROE 12.9%
  • Revenue growth 5Y 14.5%
  • PEG ratio 1.58
  • Earnings quality (operating cash flow / net income) 1.07
  • Share dilution 0.2%
  • Net margin trend 30.2% vs 20.6%
  • Piotroski F-Score 6/9

Failed (5)

  • Current ratio
  • Low reliance on intangibles
  • Price below Graham Number
  • DCF valuation (Overvalued)
  • Earnings surprise, average 1.2%

Unavailable (4)

  • P/FCF –
  • Dividend payout –
  • Positive free cash flow
  • CapEx intensity

Piotroski F-Score

6/9

Mixed signals: some areas need attention

ROA > 0
Operating cash flow > 0
ΔROA > 0
Cash flow > net income
Leverage ↓
Current ratio ↑
No dilution
Gross margin ↑
Asset turnover ↑

Earnings Quality

1.07

High quality: earnings backed by cash

Share Dilution

0.2%

Share count is stable

Institutional Holdings

Governance

Executive Team

NameTitleAge
Mr. Laurence Neil HunnPresident, CEO & Director53
Mr. Jason P. Conley CPAExecutive VP & CFO49
Mr. John K. StipancichExecutive VP, Chief Legal Officer & Corporate Secretary56
Mr. Zack MoxceyVice President of Investor Relations-
Mr. Satish MaripuriSenior VP & Group Executive59
Mr. Harold C. Flynn Jr.Senior VP & Group Executive60
Mr. Michael P. CorkerySenior VP & Group Executive62
Ms. Janet GlazerSenior Vice President of Acquisitions & Investment Strategy Development-
Mr. Jeffrey B. PaulsenSenior VP & Group Executive64
Mr. Ondrej KrukSenior VP & Group Executive-

Audit Risk

3

Board Risk

1

Compensation Risk

4

Shareholder Rights Risk

5

Documents

  • Annual Report (10-K)

    A yearly overview of the business, its financial results, and the risks it faces.

    Filed on 2026-02-24

    View document
  • Quarterly Report (10-Q)

    A snapshot of financial performance for the most recent three-month period.

    Filed on 2026-07-31

    View document
  • Current Report (8-K)

    An announcement of a major event, such as a leadership change or big news.

    Filed on 2026-10-22

    View document

via SEC EDGAR

Income History

via SEC EDGAR

Part 2 · The price and its context

This part shows how the price has behaved, not whether the company is worth owning. Inside: technical analysis, potential, historical drawdowns, gamma exposure.

Market Reaction Profile

How much ROP moves, measured on its daily prices.

VolatilityMedium

More volatile than 47% of the tracked stocks (90-day volatility).

Volatility 30d
37.2%
Volatility 90d
35.1%
Beta vs S&P 500 (1y)
-0.07Correlation -0.03
Max drawdown (12m)
-34.3%
ATR (14d, % of price)
2.64%

Earnings reactions

How ROP moved around its past quarterly results.

Next earnings release

No upcoming release on the calendar.

What usually happens

  • Over the last 12 releases the stock moved a median of 4.7% the next day, up or down.
  • Next-day moves: up 4, down 8 (out of 12).
  • Of the 4 releases that beat estimates, the stock fell the next day after 2.

Release history

DateWhen EPS est.EPS actualSurprise Gap 1 day5 days
Oct 22, 2026Before the open5.795.89+1.7% +2.6% +9.7% n/a
Jul 23, 2026During the session5.345.38+0.8% +8.6% +5.5% +21.2%
Apr 23, 2026During the session5.035.16+2.6% +4.0% -0.3% -2.4%
Jan 27, 2026During the session5.195.21+0.4% -9.8% -9.6% -8.8%
Oct 23, 2025During the sessionn/an/an/a-8.2% -5.7% -12.3%
Jul 21, 2025During the sessionn/an/an/a+0.9% +1.3% +3.3%
Apr 28, 2025During the sessionn/an/an/a-3.5% -1.0% +1.5%
Jan 30, 2025During the sessionn/an/an/a+4.2% +5.1% +7.1%
Oct 23, 2024During the sessionn/an/an/a-0.4% -1.7% -0.6%
Jul 24, 2024During the sessionn/an/an/a-4.9% -7.4% -5.1%
Apr 26, 2024During the sessionn/an/an/a-1.9% -2.5% -5.5%
Jan 31, 2024During the sessionn/an/an/a-6.1% -4.4% -2.9%

Release dates from SEC 8-K filings.

Updated 10/24/2026

Historical statistics for educational purposes only. They are not forecasts and not investment advice.

Price reaction to the news

Latest news on ROP and what the price did next.

Return of the stock minus return of SPY over the same days. A news item close to a price move did not necessarily cause it. Historical data for educational purposes only, not investment advice.

Latest News

Recent headlines for ROP.

  • 6/11/2026POSITIVE
    Here's How Much $100 Invested In Roper Technologies 20 Years Ago Would Be Worth Today

    An investment of $100 in Roper Technologies (ROP) twenty years ago would have grown to approximately $2,370 today, representing a significant compound annual growth rate of around 16.5%. This performance underscores the company's consistent ability to generate substantial shareholder value over the long term. Roper Technologies, a diversified industrial company, has a history of strategic acquisitions and operational efficiencies that have contributed to its impressive stock appreciation. Investors looking for steady, long-term growth may find ROP's historical performance indicative of its potential for future returns.

  • 4/23/2026NEUTRAL
    Roper Techs Q1 2026 Earnings Call Transcript

    Roper Technologies Inc. released its Q1 2026 Earnings Call Transcript on April 23, 2026. The transcript provides detailed insights into the company's financial performance, strategic initiatives, and future outlook. While specific financial figures and forward-looking statements are contained within, the release of the transcript itself is an informational event. Investors should review the content for potential impacts on the company's valuation and strategic direction.