Back to rankings

TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING CO LTD (TSMWF)

POSITIVE
TechnologySemiconductorsTaiwan

Fundamental

81

Price

$416.60

Market Cap

$2.10T

Part 1 · What the company is worth

Overview

Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) is the world's largest dedicated semiconductor foundry: it manufactures chips to designs supplied by its customers and does not sell chips of its own design. Its customers are fabless chip designers and, increasingly, system companies that design their own silicon. TSMC operates its own fabs, mainly in Taiwan and increasingly abroad, and in 2025 its annual capacity exceeded 17 million 12-inch equivalent wafers. It runs the full range of process technologies, from mature nodes of 0.25 micron and above to leading-edge 3-nanometer in volume production, with 2-nanometer entering volume production during 2025, and it also sells advanced packaging (CoWoS, SoIC, InFO), mask making and testing. Net revenue in 2025 was NT$3,809,054 million (US$121,423 million) and net income attributable to shareholders of the parent was NT$1,697,604 million.

How it makes money

TSMC is paid per wafer it fabricates. Wafer fabrication accounted for approximately 86% of net revenue in 2025; the rest came mainly from packaging and testing services, mask making, design services and royalty income. Prices are set with customers for defined periods and can be adjusted during the period for market conditions. Revenue therefore depends on how many wafers customers order, on the price per wafer, and on the technology mix: leading-edge nodes command far higher prices per wafer than mature ones, and in 2025 the 3-nanometer node alone was 24% of wafer revenue, 5-nanometer 36% and 7-nanometer 14%. Because the fabs are owned and extremely capital-intensive — capital expenditure was NT$1,272,411 million in 2025 — utilisation of that capacity drives margins as much as revenue does.

Revenue by segment

High Performance Computing (HPC)58%

Chips for AI accelerators (AI GPUs and AI ASICs), server and PC processors, consumer GPUs, FPGAs and high-speed networking, sold to fabless designers and to system companies for cloud, enterprise data centres and 5G/6G infrastructure. It is TSMC's largest and fastest-growing platform, up 48% year over year in 2025.

Smartphone29%

Application processors and companion chips — radio frequency, embedded non-volatile memory, power management, sensors, display drivers — for premium and mainstream handsets, plus advanced packaging such as InFO. Revenue grew 11% in 2025 but its share of the group fell as HPC expanded.

Internet of Things (IoT)5%

Ultra-low-power logic and specialty technologies for connected and edge-AI devices, from 4-nanometer down to mature 55-nanometer nodes, aimed at battery-powered products and IoT systems-on-a-chip.

Automotive5%

Automotive-grade logic and specialty chips for driver-assistance systems, infotainment and zonal controllers, plus embedded flash, millimetre-wave radio frequency, image and LiDAR sensors, sold to automotive semiconductor suppliers and carmakers' chip partners.

Others2%

Revenue that does not fall into the five named platforms, including miscellaneous foundry and related services.

Digital Consumer Electronics (DCE)1%

Chips for smart TVs, set-top boxes, streaming media devices, smart cameras, wireless LAN and power management in consumer devices, mostly on 5- to 22-nanometer technologies.

Competitive moat

Scale · Wide

TSMC's advantage rests on scale that competitors struggle to match. Staying at the technology frontier requires capital spending of the order of NT$1,272,411 million a year (2025) and research and development that rose 20.7% in 2025 alone; only a company that can spread that cost over more than 17 million 12-inch equivalent wafers of annual capacity can fund it and still earn a return. The company states that it competes primarily on process technology, manufacturing excellence, customer trust and service quality — earlier technology readiness, better yield, shorter cycle time. Its neutrality helps too: as a dedicated foundry it designs no chips of its own, so it does not compete with the customers who entrust it with their designs. The advantage is not permanent by construction: the company itself warns that if it fails to remain a technological leader, or if rivals gain better access to government financial incentives, it may lose customers and see margins fall.

What drives demand

Cyclical

TSMC describes itself as dependent on the highly cyclical semiconductor and electronics industries, which have gone through significant and sometimes prolonged downturns and periods of overcapacity, so revenue, margins and earnings may fluctuate significantly. Demand ultimately comes from end products that contain chips: when their unit sales and average selling prices fall, orders for wafers fall with them. The cycle is amplified by the capital intensity of the business — capacity is committed years ahead, so a downturn leaves expensive fabs underused, while a sharp upturn can arrive faster than capacity can be restored. Within that cycle the mix has shifted markedly: the company identifies data explosion and AI application innovation as the key growth driver, with HPC rising from 43% of revenue in 2023 to 58% in 2025 while smartphone fell from 38% to 29%.

Key risks

  • Geopolitics, tariffs and trade restrictions — The company warns that global political, economic and financial crises could hurt its results, and describes an unusually fluid trade environment: a 10% U.S. baseline tariff announced in April 2025, reciprocal tariffs later struck down by a U.S. Supreme Court ruling in February 2026, a replacement tariff under Section 122, a 25% ad valorem tariff on certain advanced computing chips following a Section 232 investigation concluded in December 2025, and Section 301 investigations initiated in March 2026 that target economies including Taiwan. Tariffs on chips or on manufacturing equipment and materials raise costs and may reduce demand.
  • Conditions in Taiwan and across its global footprint — TSMC states that its global manufacturing, design and sales activities expose it to political, economic, financial and military conditions in various jurisdictions, and in particular in the Republic of China (Taiwan), where most of its capacity sits. It separately warns that it may fail to manage the complexity of its global operations and the challenges of overseas expansion, with adverse effects on its business, financial condition and results.
  • Cyclicality of the semiconductor industry — The company describes itself as dependent on the highly cyclical semiconductor and electronics industries, which have gone through significant and sometimes prolonged downturns and periods of overcapacity, so that its revenue, margins and earnings may fluctuate significantly. It also flags that falling demand and average selling prices for products containing semiconductors may reduce demand for its own services.
  • Customer concentration — Having one or more large customers account for a significant share of revenue makes the company vulnerable to their loss or to a sharp cut in their orders, and customer consolidation may increase that concentration further. The filing notes that a more concentrated base exposes revenue to the seasonal patterns of a few large buyers, and that export controls aimed at major customers could restrict TSMC's ability to supply them.
  • Loss of technological leadership and competition — TSMC warns that if it cannot remain a technological leader, respond quickly to changing market dynamics or keep its edge in product quality, it will become less competitive; and that if it cannot compete effectively in the foundry segment — including through equal access to the government financial incentives available to rivals — it may lose customers and see profit margins and earnings decline. It also flags the risk of failing to manage capacity and production facilities effectively.
  • Cyberattacks on information systems — The company states that if its information technology systems, or those of service providers with whom it shares confidential information, fall to cyberattacks, its business and operations could be severely interrupted or even shut down, with material adverse effects on results, financial condition, prospects and reputation.
  • Equipment, raw materials and utilities — TSMC may be unable to obtain, in time and at a reasonable cost, the equipment it needs to stay competitive, or adequate supplies of raw materials at commercially reasonable prices. It separately warns that power or other utility outages, shortages or price increases could interrupt its operations, limit its expansion and hurt its financial results, and that disruptive events or industrial accidents at its own, its customers' or its suppliers' sites could materially affect results.
  • Talent, intellectual property, currency and regulation — The filing lists further risks: failure to recruit and retain key executives, managers and skilled technical staff could hold back planned growth; an inability to obtain, preserve, enforce and defend technologies, intellectual property rights and third-party licences could harm its competitive position; adverse exchange-rate moves could cut operating margin and revenue; and non-compliance with export control, antitrust, environmental and climate laws, or delays in approvals such as fab land and construction permits, could bring significant legal liability. Impairment charges, failures of internal control, and changes to tax rules in Taiwan, the United States or elsewhere are also disclosed as risks to net income.

Customer concentration

Top customers account for 78% of revenue

TSMC serves hundreds of customers worldwide, but the top of the list is heavy: the ten largest accounted for approximately 78% of net revenue in 2025, up from 76% in 2024 and 70% in 2023. The single largest customer was 19% of net revenue in 2025 (25% in 2023, 22% in 2024) and the second largest 17% (11% in 2023, 12% in 2024) — the second name has been closing the gap fast. The company attributes the concentration to the structural shift towards HPC and smartphone applications, where only a limited number of customers operate at that scale, and to consolidation among its customers.

The case for

Buyers argue that TSMC is the indispensable manufacturer of the world's most advanced chips and that the AI build-out is only beginning to show up in its numbers: high performance computing revenue grew 48% in 2025 and now makes up 58% of the group, against 43% two years earlier, while group revenue rose from NT$2,894,308 million to NT$3,809,054 million. They point to a business whose neutrality — no chips of its own to compete with customers — makes it the natural partner for both fabless designers and system companies now designing their own silicon, and whose scale lets it absorb NT$1,272,411 million of annual capital spending and a 20.7% increase in research and development while still earning NT$1,697,604 million of net income. They add that the technology lead is widening rather than narrowing, with 3-nanometer already 24% of wafer revenue and 2-nanometer entering volume production in 2025, and that a customer designing a leading-edge chip has, in practice, very few alternatives.

The case against

Sellers fear that the same forces driving the numbers up could reverse them. Concentration is the first worry: the ten largest customers are already 78% of revenue and two of them alone are 36%, so a design loss, an inventory correction or an export-control measure aimed at one buyer moves the whole company. The second is geopolitical: most capacity sits in Taiwan, and the filing itself describes military and political conditions there as a risk, alongside a tariff regime that changed three times between April 2025 and March 2026 and now includes a 25% ad valorem duty on certain advanced computing chips imported into the United States. The third is the cycle and the capital behind it: the company calls its industry highly cyclical and prone to prolonged overcapacity, yet it committed NT$1,272,411 million of capital expenditure in 2025 — spending that must be recovered whether or not AI demand grows as forecast, and that the filing warns can lead to impairment charges. Sellers also note that overseas fabs raise costs, that rivals may obtain government incentives TSMC cannot match, and that a single stumble at the technology frontier would erode the advantage the whole thesis rests on.

Generated on August 23, 2026 with claude-opus-5 — shared with all users

Direct competitors

Who this company fights with for the same customers

Compare

Generated on August 23, 2026 with claude-opus-5 — shared with all users

P/E: —Score: 46Market cap: $440.14B

Through Intel Foundry it sells advanced-node wafer manufacturing and packaging to external chip designers, targeting the same US and AI customers, while also producing in-house the CPUs it would otherwise outsource to TSMC.

P/E: 37.5Score: 64Market cap: $26.37B

A pure-play foundry with fabs in the US, Germany and Singapore competing for the same specialty-node business — automotive, RF and IoT chips — and for customers who want manufacturing outside Taiwan.

Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (삼성전자)005930.KS

Samsung Foundry is the only other manufacturer offering leading-edge 2nm-class contract production, and bids for the same smartphone, HPC and AI-accelerator chip designers that TSMC serves.

United Microelectronics Corporation (聯華電子股份有限公司)2303.TW

A Taiwanese pure-play foundry competing with TSMC for the same fabless customers on mature and specialty nodes, where much of TSMC's non-leading-edge wafer volume sits.

Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation (中芯国际集成电路制造有限公司)0981.HK

China's largest foundry and the third-ranked pure-play worldwide, it takes wafer orders from Chinese fabless designers that would otherwise go to TSMC.

Balance Sheet & Liquidity

Revenue

$4.44T

Trailing 12 months (through 6/30/2026)

Net Income

$2.22T

Trailing 12 months (through 6/30/2026)

Free Cash Flow

$730.83B

Total Equity

$25.20B

Total Liabilities

$1.07T

Current Ratio

2.46

Interest Coverage

-

Debt/EBITDA

0.34

Earnings Per Share

Revenue & Net Income

Free Cash Flow

Income Breakdown

Historical statement

Margins over time

Debt over time

How heavy the debt is

Growth grid

Growth — Revenue

Fair Value Estimation

Undervalued

Fair Value

$1985.40

Current Price

$416.60

Margin of Safety

+79.0%

Fair Value Range

$1290.51 - $2680.29

Estimation Methods

Analyst Target:$554.45
DCF:$6429.71
PE-based:$286.50
Graham Growth:$690.35
EPV:$768.00
Analyst Consensus:Strong Buy (41B / 2H / 0S)
Last Earnings Surprise:+10.92%

Valuation Metrics

P/E Ratio

30.26

ROE

40.0%

P/B Ratio

83.49

P/FCF

2.88

Gross Margin

64.2%

ROIC

193.5%

Profitability Radar

Value Creation (Economic Moat)

ROIC

193.5%

WACC

9.8%

ROIC − WACC

+183.7 pp

ROIC exceeds the cost of capital — the company is creating value for shareholders.

Fundamental Analysis Criteria

Passed (15)

  • Price CAGR 30.73%
  • ROIC 193.5%
  • Gross Margin 64.2%
  • P/FCF 2.88
  • Positive Free Cash Flow
  • Current Ratio
  • Debt/EBITDA
  • DCF valuation (Undervalued)
  • ROE 39.9%
  • Revenue Growth 5Y 23.3%
  • Analyst Consensus 95% Buy
  • Earnings Surprise avg 7.1%
  • PEG Ratio 1.03
  • Earnings Quality (OCF/NI) 1.53
  • Net Margin Trend 45.1% vs 40.5%

Failed (4)

  • P/B Ratio 83.49
  • Debt/Equity ratio
  • CapEx intensity
  • Piotroski F-Score 2/9

Unavailable (8)

  • EPS data insufficient
  • Dividend Payout NaN%
  • Operating Margin NaN%
  • Interest Coverage
  • Return on Tangible Assets
  • Low reliance on intangibles
  • Price below Graham Number
  • Share Dilution (missing shares data)

Piotroski F-Score

2/9

Serious financial concerns

score
criteria

Earnings Quality

1.53

High quality: earnings backed by cash

Share Dilution

-

Buying back shares. Shareholder friendly

Governance

Executive Team

NameTitleAge
Dr. C. C. Wei Ph.D.Chairman & CEO-
Mr. Jen-Chau HuangSenior VP & CFO-
Mr. Y. P. ChynExecutive VP of Operations & Co-COO-
Dr. Y. J. MiiExecutive VP & Co-COO-
Dr. Min CaoVP of Research, Development, Pathfinding & Corporate Research and CTO-
Dr. Horng-Dar LinVice President of Corporate Information Technology & Chief Information Officer-
Mr. Jeff SuDirector of Investor Relations-
Ms. Sylvia FangSenior VP, General Counsel & Corporate Governance Officer-
Mr. Pei-Hong ChenVice President of the Human Resources-
Dr. Wei-Jen LoSenior Vice President of Corporate Strategy Development-

Part 2 · The price and when to enter

This part won't tell you whether the company is worth owning: it helps you choose when to buy it, once the fundamentals have convinced you. Inside: technical analysis, potential, historical drawdowns, gamma exposure.

Latest News

Recent headlines for TSMWF, sourced from Markets Gazette.

No recent news for TSMWF.