Back to rankings

Woodward, Inc. (WWD)

NEUTRAL
IndustrialsAerospace & DefenseUnited States

Fundamental

65

Price

$339.00

Market Cap

$20.27B

Part 1 · What the company is worth

Overview

Woodward designs and builds the control systems that manage how aircraft engines and large industrial equipment actually run: fuel systems, actuators and electronic controls that regulate thrust, pressure and timing. Its aerospace parts fly on commercial and military aircraft engines built by companies like GE and RTX; its industrial parts go into gas turbines, engines used in power generation, and equipment for oil and gas and transportation. Woodward supplies the component maker, not the end customer directly.

How it makes money

Woodward sells new equipment to engine and machinery makers at the time a platform is built, then earns a long tail of aftermarket revenue selling spare parts and repairs over the decades that platform stays in service. Aftermarket sales carry higher margins and recur regardless of new production rates, which cushions results when new aircraft or industrial-equipment build rates slow. Winning a spot on a new engine platform takes years of qualification, but once won it tends to last the platform's life.

Revenue by segment

Aerospace64.8%

Fuel systems, actuators and controls for commercial and defense aircraft engines, Woodward's largest and fastest-growing segment in fiscal 2025.

Industrial35.2%

Controls and components for power generation, oil and gas, and transportation equipment; net sales declined slightly in fiscal 2025 on lower transportation demand.

Competitive moat

Switching costs · Narrow

Once a Woodward component is qualified onto an aircraft engine or turbine platform, replacing it requires re-certifying the whole system with regulators and the engine maker, a process that can take years. That locks in decades of aftermarket sales for components already flying, but the advantage only exists where Woodward already won the design; new platforms are contested from scratch against competent rivals.

What drives demand

Cyclical

Aerospace revenue tracks how many commercial aircraft Boeing and Airbus are building and how much airlines are flying, both of which swing with air travel demand and aircraft-maker production rates. Industrial revenue follows capital spending in power generation, oil and gas and transportation, which rises and falls with energy prices and broader economic activity.

Key risks

  • Revenue concentrated among large OEM customers — The five largest customers made up about 36% of fiscal 2025 net sales. A shift in one large engine or equipment maker's production plans affects Woodward disproportionately.
  • Supply chain and labor constraints — Woodward cites disruptions and constraints in the global supply chain and labor markets as a risk to its ability to deliver product on schedule and meet demand.
  • Long sales and qualification cycles — Winning a position on a new aircraft engine or industrial platform takes a long qualification cycle; a lost bid means years without a chance to compete for that same revenue again.
  • Aerospace market consolidation — Woodward flags consolidation among aerospace customers and competitors as a risk factor, since fewer, larger buyers can gain more negotiating leverage over suppliers like Woodward.

Customer concentration

Top customers account for 36% of revenue

Woodward's five largest customers accounted for about 36% of consolidated net sales in fiscal 2025, though the company states no single customer reached 10% of total sales that year.

The case for

Buyers argue that record fiscal 2025 sales and double-digit Aerospace growth reflect a multi-year commercial aircraft build-out still ahead of it, that decades of locked-in aftermarket revenue on already-flying engines provide a stable earnings floor, and that Industrial's softer year masks improving power-generation and oil-and-gas demand underneath it.

The case against

Sellers worry that with five customers controlling over a third of sales, a single large buyer's production cut or in-house move would hit results hard, that Aerospace's growth depends on Boeing and Airbus sustaining their own build rates, and that Industrial's decline shows softness in transportation demand that could spread.

Segment figures from fiscal year 2025Sources: Woodward Reports Record Sales & Earnings for Fiscal Year 2025

Written by the editors, published on August 18, 2026

Direct competitors

Who this company fights with for the same customers

No editorial profile for this company yet

No competitor list for this company yet.

Balance Sheet & Liquidity

Revenue

$4.19B

Trailing 12 months (through 6/30/2026)

Net Income

$552M

Trailing 12 months (through 6/30/2026)

Free Cash Flow

$340M

Total Equity

$2.57B

Total Liabilities

$2.06B

Current Ratio

1.65

Interest Coverage

-

Debt/EBITDA

1.70

Earnings Per Share

Revenue & Net Income

Free Cash Flow

Income Breakdown

Historical statement

Margins over time

Debt over time

How heavy the debt is

Growth grid

Growth — Revenue

Fair Value Estimation

Fairly Valued

Fair Value

$310.03

Current Price

$339.00

Margin of Safety

-9.3%

Fair Value Range

$201.52 - $418.54

Estimation Methods

Analyst Target:$450.36
DCF:$207.74
PE-based:$304.56
Graham Growth:$287.97
EPV:$94.02
Analyst Consensus:Strong Buy (14B / 3H / 0S)
Last Earnings Surprise:-0.04%

Valuation Metrics

P/E Ratio

37.06

ROE

17.2%

P/B Ratio

7.95

P/FCF

52.24

Gross Margin

29.5%

ROIC

-

Profitability Radar

Value Creation (Economic Moat)

ROIC

-

WACC

8.8%

ROIC − WACC

-

Fundamental Analysis Criteria

Passed (16)

  • EPS shows upward trend
  • EPS CAGR 8.67%
  • Price CAGR 17.40%
  • Debt/Equity ratio
  • Positive Free Cash Flow
  • Current Ratio
  • Debt/EBITDA
  • Return on Tangible Assets
  • ROE 21.8%
  • Revenue Growth 5Y 7.4%
  • Analyst Consensus 82% Buy
  • Earnings Surprise avg 12.2%
  • Earnings Quality (OCF/NI) 1.06
  • Share Dilution -0.9%
  • Net Margin Trend 13.2% vs 11.3%
  • Piotroski F-Score 9/9

Failed (8)

  • Gross Margin 29.5%
  • P/FCF 52.24
  • P/B Ratio 7.95
  • CapEx intensity
  • Low reliance on intangibles
  • Price below Graham Number
  • DCF valuation (Overvalued)
  • PEG Ratio 2.78

Unavailable (4)

  • ROIC NaN%
  • Dividend Payout NaN%
  • Operating Margin NaN%
  • Interest Coverage

Piotroski F-Score

9/9

Strong financial health

score
criteria

Earnings Quality

1.06

High quality: earnings backed by cash

Share Dilution

-0.9%

Buying back shares. Shareholder friendly

Governance

Executive Team

NameTitleAge
Mr. Charles P. Blankenship Jr.CEO & Chairman58
Mr. William F. LaceyExecutive VP & CFO55
Mr. Thomas G. CromwellExecutive VP & COO56
Mr. Terence J. VoskuilExecutive VP & CTO of Aerospace59
Mr. Randall L. HobbsExecutive VP & President of Industrial57
Daniel ProvaznikDirector of Investor Relations-
Ms. Karrie M. BemExecutive VP, General Counsel, Corporate Secretary & Chief Compliance Officer47
Mr. Ron C. CharlesExecutive VP & Chief Human Resources Officer55
Mr. W. John GodsmanExecutive Vice President of Strategy & Business Development-
Mr. Shawn McLevigeExecutive VP & President of Aerospace Segment-

Audit Risk

2

Board Risk

5

Compensation Risk

1

Shareholder Rights Risk

2

Part 2 · The price and when to enter

This part won't tell you whether the company is worth owning: it helps you choose when to buy it, once the fundamentals have convinced you. Inside: technical analysis, potential, historical drawdowns, gamma exposure.

Latest News

Recent headlines for WWD, sourced from Markets Gazette.

  • 6/17/2026POSITIVE
    If You Invested $100 In Woodward Stock 10 Years Ago, You Would Have This Much Today

    An investment of $100 in Woodward Inc. stock a decade ago would have yielded a significant return, illustrating the company's long-term growth trajectory. While specific figures are not detailed in the provided snippet, the article's premise suggests substantial capital appreciation for shareholders over the past ten years. This historical performance underscores Woodward's resilience and ability to generate value, potentially signaling continued strength for investors monitoring its market performance and future prospects.

  • 4/17/2026NEUTRAL
    This Woodward Analyst Begins Coverage On A Bullish Note; Here Are Top 5 Initiations For Friday

    A prominent analyst has initiated coverage on Woodward Inc. with a bullish stance, highlighting it as a top pick among several new initiations. While specific details of the analyst's price targets or reasoning are not provided in this snippet, the initiation of coverage with a positive outlook suggests potential upside for the company's stock. Investors will be looking for further elaboration on the analyst's thesis to understand the catalysts driving this optimistic view, which could influence trading sentiment and future performance.

via Markets Gazette