Back to rankings

Antero Resources Corp (AR)

Fair Value
EnergyOil & Gas E&PUnited States

Fundamental

87

Price

$40.16

Market Cap

$11.84B

Part 1 · What the company is worth

Overview

Antero Resources is an independent oil and natural gas exploration and production company focused on the development of unconventional natural gas, natural gas liquids (NGLs), and oil reserves in the Appalachian Basin. The company operates properties primarily in West Virginia and Ohio, using horizontal drilling and advanced hydraulic fracturing technologies to economically develop natural gas from unconventional formations. Antero produced 1,256 billion cubic feet equivalent in 2025, including 808 Bcf of natural gas, 71.8 million barrels of NGLs, and 2.9 million barrels of oil.

How it makes money

Antero generates revenue from the sale of natural gas, natural gas liquids (NGLs), and crude oil produced from its Appalachian Basin properties. Revenue is directly determined by production volumes and commodity market prices, which are set by global supply and demand dynamics. In fiscal 2025, the company realized revenues of $5.275 billion, with natural gas accounting for 54.5%, NGLs 37.7%, oil 2.8%, and derivatives/marketing 5.0% of total revenue.

Revenue by segment

Exploration and Productionshare not disclosed

Core business segment focused on the development, production, and acquisition of natural gas, NGLs, and oil reserves in the Appalachian Basin. This segment represents the vast majority of Antero's revenue generation through direct commodity sales.

Marketing of Excess Firm Transportation Capacityshare not disclosed

Monetizes excess firm transportation capacity on interstate pipelines by marketing and selling capacity rights to third parties. This segment generates supplementary revenue from unused contractual transportation rights.

Equity Method Investment in Antero Midstreamshare not disclosed

29% ownership stake in Antero Midstream Corporation, accounted for using the equity method. Antero Midstream provides gathering, compression, water handling, and processing services for Antero Resources' production. The investment generates equity earnings rather than consolidated revenue.

Competitive moat

Scale · Narrow

Antero possesses scale advantages in the Appalachian Basin through its large contiguous acreage position, established infrastructure, and integrated operations with Antero Midstream. The company benefits from cost efficiencies derived from development scale and operational expertise in unconventional natural gas production. However, the moat is narrow because it is fundamentally tied to commodity markets where price-setting power is minimal, reserve depletion requires continuous reinvestment to maintain production, and the basin-specific advantage can be replicated by competitors with sufficient capital. The company's competitive position depends on execution excellence and cost management rather than durable structural advantages.

What drives demand

Cyclical

Antero's demand is cyclical and highly sensitive to macroeconomic conditions, energy prices, and industrial activity. Natural gas demand fluctuates with heating demands in winter months, industrial production levels, power generation fuel mix, and LNG export capacity. NGLs and crude oil demand follows broader petroleum market cycles driven by transportation, petrochemical production, and economic growth. During economic expansion, energy demand rises; during recessions, demand contracts sharply. Commodity price cycles directly amplify or dampen production investment decisions and cash generation.

Key risks

  • Commodity Price Volatility — Natural gas, NGLs, and oil prices are determined by global market supply and demand, and the company has limited ability to control or predict these prices. Significant declines in commodity prices would reduce operating cash flow, limit capital expenditure capacity, impair asset values if undiscounted future cash flows fall below carrying amounts, and restrict the company's ability to service debt obligations.
  • Reserve Replacement Challenge — The company produced 1,256 Bcfe annually in 2025 against proved reserves of approximately 19,149 Bcfe, implying a reserve life of roughly 15 years. Antero must continually replace depleting reserves through successful exploration and development, or production will decline. Development of proved undeveloped reserves carries execution risk, may take longer than anticipated, and may require higher capital expenditures than estimated.
  • Capital Intensity and Financing Risk — Antero requires annual capital expenditures of $1.1–1.3 billion to maintain and grow production. Insufficient cash generation from operations or inability to access capital markets could force the company to reduce development activity, divest assets, or increase leverage. Debt covenants restrict operational flexibility and could accelerate repayment obligations if financial metrics deteriorate.
  • Regulatory and Environmental Risk — Hydraulic fracturing regulations may increase operational costs, impose completion delays, or limit drilling in certain areas. Environmental and occupational safety regulations require substantial capital and operational investment. Climate change-related regulations and policy changes could restrict natural gas demand, reduce operational areas, or impose additional compliance costs that reduce profitability.
  • Midstream Dependence and Control Risk — Antero owns only 29% of Antero Midstream and uses equity method accounting, limiting operational control over critical midstream infrastructure and services. Performance, capital allocation, and strategic decisions are made by Antero Midstream's board of directors, in which Antero Resources has minority representation. Disruptions or underperformance of midstream assets could affect production delivery and financial results.
  • Firm Transportation and Fixed Cost Obligations — Antero is obligated to pay minimum volume commitment fees to midstream service providers under long-term contracts, regardless of actual production or market conditions. In periods of low commodity prices or reduced production, these fixed costs create cash flow pressure and reduce profitability.

The case for

Buyers argue that Antero Resources benefits from a fortress balance sheet with improving leverage ratios, a large low-cost reserve base in the Appalachian Basin providing 15 years of production visibility, and strong operational execution. The 2025 HG Acquisition significantly expands the company's reserve base and production scale, with pro forma 2025 production of approximately 1.5 million barrels of oil equivalent per day. The company generates substantial free cash flow ($810 million in 2025) that can fund debt reduction or shareholder returns. Antero's integrated operations with 29% ownership of Antero Midstream provide cost and operational advantages. Natural gas remains a critical transition fuel for power generation and industrial demand, supporting long-term market demand. The company is positioned to benefit if natural gas prices remain elevated amid energy security concerns and LNG export demand.

The case against

Sellers fear that Antero faces substantial headwinds from natural gas price volatility, with 2025 natural gas realizations of $3.56/Mcf vulnerable to declines if global LNG supply increases or recession reduces demand. The company's high capital intensity ($1.1–1.3 billion annually) means cash generation is highly sensitive to commodity prices, making leverage vulnerable in downturns. Reserve replacement remains unproven; annual production of 1,256 Bcfe against a 15-year reserve life implies the company must successfully develop approximately 6% of its reserve base annually just to maintain flat production. The HG Acquisition integration carries execution risk and could destroy value if synergies fail to materialize. Firm transportation and minimum volume commitments create fixed cost burdens that compress margins during low-price periods. Regulatory headwinds from climate policy and hydraulic fracturing restrictions could increase costs or limit market access. Antero Midstream's operational separation limits management control and creates dependence on a partner's capital allocation decisions. Long-term structural decline in natural gas demand amid the energy transition poses existential risk to the business model.

Generated with artificial intelligence on September 21, 2026, shared with all users

Direct competitors

Who this company fights with for the same customers

Compare

Generated with artificial intelligence on September 18, 2026, shared with all users

P/E: 12.9Score: 72Market cap: $33.82B

EQT is the other large Appalachian pure-play producer, drilling the same Marcellus and Utica acreage in West Virginia, Pennsylvania and Ohio and selling its gas into the same regional pipelines and LNG-linked outlets that Antero supplies.

P/E: 6.9Score: 81Market cap: $22.35B

Born from the Chesapeake–Southwestern merger, Expand Energy is the largest US natural gas producer and holds the Appalachian acreage Southwestern brought in, so it competes with Antero for the same gas buyers, the same pipeline capacity and the same LNG feedgas contracts.

Range Resources CorporationRRC

Range Resources works the wet-gas window of the Marcellus in south-west Pennsylvania and is, like Antero, one of the few large producers of ethane and propane in Appalachia, so the two sell into the same NGL market.

CNX Resources CorporationCNX

CNX is an Appalachian-only gas producer operating Marcellus and Utica wells in the same states, competing with Antero for acreage, drilling services and firm transportation out of the basin.

Coterra Energy Inc.CTRA

Coterra's Marcellus operations in north-east Pennsylvania make it one of the largest dry-gas producers in the basin, selling into the same north-eastern and Gulf Coast gas markets as Antero.

Ascent Resources Utica Holdings, LLCNot tracked

Ascent Resources is the largest privately held Utica Shale operator in Ohio, drilling liquids-rich wells next to Antero's own Ohio acreage and competing for the same leases and midstream capacity.

Balance Sheet & Liquidity

Revenue

$6.13B

Trailing 12 months (through 6/30/2026)

Net Income

$1.12B

Trailing 12 months (through 6/30/2026)

Free Cash Flow

-

Total Equity

$7.55B

Total Liabilities

$5.53B

Current Ratio

0.40

Interest Coverage

-

Debt/EBITDA

2.83

Earnings Per Share

Revenue & Net Income

Free Cash Flow

Income Breakdown

Historical statement

Margins over time

Debt over time

How heavy the debt is

Growth grid

Growth — Revenue

Fair Value Estimation

CyclicalFairly Valued

Fair Value

$44.16

Current Price

$40.16

Margin of Safety

+9.1%

Fair Value Range

$38.86 - $49.46

Spread across the valuation methods used, not a statistically calibrated confidence interval.

Estimation Methods

Analyst price target:$49.64
Discounted cash flow (DCF):Not applicable to this type of company
Earnings multiple (P/E):$30.16
Graham growth formula:Not applicable to this type of company
Earnings power value (EPV):$46.95
Justified P/B:Not applicable to this type of company
Dividend discount (Gordon):Not applicable to this type of company
P/FFO, funds from operations:Not applicable to this type of company
Mid-cycle earnings:$42.28
Revenue multiple:Not applicable to this type of company
Last Earnings Surprise:-10.03%

Valuation Metrics

P/E Ratio

11.51

ROE

8.9%

P/B Ratio

1.48

P/FCF

-

Gross Margin

-

ROIC

8.8%

Profitability Radar

Value Creation (Economic Moat)

ROIC

8.8%

WACC

5.8%

ROIC − WACC

+3.1 pp

ROIC exceeds the cost of capital — the company is creating value for shareholders.

Fundamental Analysis Criteria

Passed (16)

  • EPS shows upward trend
  • ROIC 8.8%
  • P/B ratio 1.48
  • Debt/equity ratio
  • Operating margin 24.7%
  • Debt/EBITDA
  • Return on tangible assets
  • Low reliance on intangibles
  • Price below Graham Number
  • DCF valuation (Undervalued)
  • ROE 13.9%
  • Revenue growth 5Y 8.6%
  • Earnings quality (operating cash flow / net income) 1.76
  • Share dilution -36.2%
  • Net margin trend 18.3% vs 10.7%
  • Piotroski F-Score 8/9

Failed (4)

  • EPS CAGR 2.18%
  • Price CAGR 4.47%
  • Current ratio
  • Earnings surprise, average -18.1%

Unavailable (7)

  • Gross margin –
  • P/FCF –
  • Dividend payout –
  • Positive free cash flow
  • CapEx intensity
  • Interest coverage
  • PEG ratio (needs P/E > 0 and growth > 0)

Piotroski F-Score

8/9

Strong financial health

ROA > 0
Operating cash flow > 0
ΔROA > 0
Cash flow > net income
Leverage ↓
Current ratio ↑
No dilution
Gross margin ↑
Asset turnover ↑

Earnings Quality

1.76

High quality: earnings backed by cash

Share Dilution

-36.2%

Buying back shares. Shareholder friendly

Institutional Holdings

Governance

Executive Team

NameTitleAge
Mr. Michael N. KennedyCEO, President & Director50
Mr. Paul M. RadyCo-Founder & Chairman Emeritus71
Mr. Brendan E. KruegerCFO, Senior VP of Finance & Treasurer40
Ms. Yvette K. Schultz J.D.Chief Compliance Officer, Senior VP of Legal, General Counsel & Corporate Secretary43
Mr. Jon S. McEversSenior Vice President of Operations-
Ms. Sheri L. PearceSenior VP of Accounting & Chief Accounting Officer58
Mr. Biren KumarChief Information Officer58
Mr. Daniel Philip KatzenbergDirector of Finance and Investor Relations-
Mr. Steven M. WoodwardSenior Vice President of Business Development66
Mr. W. Patrick AshSenior Vice President of Reserves, Planning & Midstream46

Audit Risk

6

Board Risk

3

Compensation Risk

3

Shareholder Rights Risk

7

Documents

  • Annual Report (10-K)

    A yearly overview of the business, its financial results, and the risks it faces.

    Filed on 2026-02-11

    View document
  • Quarterly Report (10-Q)

    A snapshot of financial performance for the most recent three-month period.

    Filed on 2026-07-29

    View document
  • Current Report (8-K)

    An announcement of a major event, such as a leadership change or big news.

    Filed on 2026-07-29

    View document

via SEC EDGAR

Income History

via SEC EDGAR

Part 2 · The price and its context

This part shows how the price has behaved, not whether the company is worth owning. Inside: technical analysis, potential, historical drawdowns, gamma exposure.

Market Reaction Profile

How much AR moves, measured on its daily prices.

VolatilityMedium

More volatile than 46% of the tracked stocks (90-day volatility).

Volatility 30d
41.7%
Volatility 90d
34.8%
Beta vs S&P 500 (1y)
-0.37Correlation -0.12
Max drawdown (12m)
-26.4%
ATR (14d, % of price)
3.07%

Earnings reactions

How AR moved around its past quarterly results.

Next earnings release

Oct 28, 2026 · In 4 days · After the close

EPS estimate: 0.98Revenue estimate: $1.6B

What usually happens

  • Over the last 12 releases the stock moved a median of 3.5% the next day, up or down.
  • Next-day moves: up 7, down 5 (out of 12).

Release history

DateWhen EPS est.EPS actualSurprise Gap 1 day5 days
Jul 29, 2026After the close0.840.76-10.0% -1.1% +0.5% -2.3%
Apr 29, 2026After the close1.161.15-0.6% -1.3% +0.6% -5.6%
Feb 11, 2026After the close0.520.43-16.6% -2.8% -3.7% -0.2%
Oct 29, 2025After the close0.270.15-45.2% -4.5% -5.0% +3.8%
Jul 30, 2025After the closen/an/an/a+0.9% +3.3% -2.4%
Apr 30, 2025After the closen/an/an/a+0.1% -0.5% +5.4%
Feb 12, 2025After the closen/an/an/a-1.6% +2.0% +0.3%
Oct 30, 2024After the closen/an/an/a-1.8% -8.3% +1.5%
Jul 31, 2024After the closen/an/an/a+1.9% -0.9% -12.8%
Apr 24, 2024After the closen/an/an/a+1.8% +6.2% +3.9%
Feb 14, 2024After the closen/an/an/a+6.9% +10.9% +21.1%
Oct 25, 2023After the closen/an/an/a-2.3% +4.8% +5.9%

Release dates from SEC 8-K filings.

Updated 10/24/2026

Historical statistics for educational purposes only. They are not forecasts and not investment advice.

Price reaction to the news

Latest news on AR and what the price did next.

No positive or negative news on AR has been archived yet.

Return of the stock minus return of SPY over the same days. A news item close to a price move did not necessarily cause it. Historical data for educational purposes only, not investment advice.

Latest News

Recent headlines for AR.

No recent news for AR.