Antero Resources Corp (AR)
Fair ValueFundamental
87
Price
$40.16
Market Cap
$11.84B
Part 1 · What the company is worth
Overview
Antero Resources is an independent oil and natural gas exploration and production company focused on the development of unconventional natural gas, natural gas liquids (NGLs), and oil reserves in the Appalachian Basin. The company operates properties primarily in West Virginia and Ohio, using horizontal drilling and advanced hydraulic fracturing technologies to economically develop natural gas from unconventional formations. Antero produced 1,256 billion cubic feet equivalent in 2025, including 808 Bcf of natural gas, 71.8 million barrels of NGLs, and 2.9 million barrels of oil.
How it makes money
Antero generates revenue from the sale of natural gas, natural gas liquids (NGLs), and crude oil produced from its Appalachian Basin properties. Revenue is directly determined by production volumes and commodity market prices, which are set by global supply and demand dynamics. In fiscal 2025, the company realized revenues of $5.275 billion, with natural gas accounting for 54.5%, NGLs 37.7%, oil 2.8%, and derivatives/marketing 5.0% of total revenue.
Revenue by segment
Core business segment focused on the development, production, and acquisition of natural gas, NGLs, and oil reserves in the Appalachian Basin. This segment represents the vast majority of Antero's revenue generation through direct commodity sales.
Monetizes excess firm transportation capacity on interstate pipelines by marketing and selling capacity rights to third parties. This segment generates supplementary revenue from unused contractual transportation rights.
29% ownership stake in Antero Midstream Corporation, accounted for using the equity method. Antero Midstream provides gathering, compression, water handling, and processing services for Antero Resources' production. The investment generates equity earnings rather than consolidated revenue.
Competitive moat
Scale · NarrowAntero possesses scale advantages in the Appalachian Basin through its large contiguous acreage position, established infrastructure, and integrated operations with Antero Midstream. The company benefits from cost efficiencies derived from development scale and operational expertise in unconventional natural gas production. However, the moat is narrow because it is fundamentally tied to commodity markets where price-setting power is minimal, reserve depletion requires continuous reinvestment to maintain production, and the basin-specific advantage can be replicated by competitors with sufficient capital. The company's competitive position depends on execution excellence and cost management rather than durable structural advantages.
What drives demand
CyclicalAntero's demand is cyclical and highly sensitive to macroeconomic conditions, energy prices, and industrial activity. Natural gas demand fluctuates with heating demands in winter months, industrial production levels, power generation fuel mix, and LNG export capacity. NGLs and crude oil demand follows broader petroleum market cycles driven by transportation, petrochemical production, and economic growth. During economic expansion, energy demand rises; during recessions, demand contracts sharply. Commodity price cycles directly amplify or dampen production investment decisions and cash generation.
Key risks
- Commodity Price Volatility — Natural gas, NGLs, and oil prices are determined by global market supply and demand, and the company has limited ability to control or predict these prices. Significant declines in commodity prices would reduce operating cash flow, limit capital expenditure capacity, impair asset values if undiscounted future cash flows fall below carrying amounts, and restrict the company's ability to service debt obligations.
- Reserve Replacement Challenge — The company produced 1,256 Bcfe annually in 2025 against proved reserves of approximately 19,149 Bcfe, implying a reserve life of roughly 15 years. Antero must continually replace depleting reserves through successful exploration and development, or production will decline. Development of proved undeveloped reserves carries execution risk, may take longer than anticipated, and may require higher capital expenditures than estimated.
- Capital Intensity and Financing Risk — Antero requires annual capital expenditures of $1.1–1.3 billion to maintain and grow production. Insufficient cash generation from operations or inability to access capital markets could force the company to reduce development activity, divest assets, or increase leverage. Debt covenants restrict operational flexibility and could accelerate repayment obligations if financial metrics deteriorate.
- Regulatory and Environmental Risk — Hydraulic fracturing regulations may increase operational costs, impose completion delays, or limit drilling in certain areas. Environmental and occupational safety regulations require substantial capital and operational investment. Climate change-related regulations and policy changes could restrict natural gas demand, reduce operational areas, or impose additional compliance costs that reduce profitability.
- Midstream Dependence and Control Risk — Antero owns only 29% of Antero Midstream and uses equity method accounting, limiting operational control over critical midstream infrastructure and services. Performance, capital allocation, and strategic decisions are made by Antero Midstream's board of directors, in which Antero Resources has minority representation. Disruptions or underperformance of midstream assets could affect production delivery and financial results.
- Firm Transportation and Fixed Cost Obligations — Antero is obligated to pay minimum volume commitment fees to midstream service providers under long-term contracts, regardless of actual production or market conditions. In periods of low commodity prices or reduced production, these fixed costs create cash flow pressure and reduce profitability.
The case for
Buyers argue that Antero Resources benefits from a fortress balance sheet with improving leverage ratios, a large low-cost reserve base in the Appalachian Basin providing 15 years of production visibility, and strong operational execution. The 2025 HG Acquisition significantly expands the company's reserve base and production scale, with pro forma 2025 production of approximately 1.5 million barrels of oil equivalent per day. The company generates substantial free cash flow ($810 million in 2025) that can fund debt reduction or shareholder returns. Antero's integrated operations with 29% ownership of Antero Midstream provide cost and operational advantages. Natural gas remains a critical transition fuel for power generation and industrial demand, supporting long-term market demand. The company is positioned to benefit if natural gas prices remain elevated amid energy security concerns and LNG export demand.
The case against
Sellers fear that Antero faces substantial headwinds from natural gas price volatility, with 2025 natural gas realizations of $3.56/Mcf vulnerable to declines if global LNG supply increases or recession reduces demand. The company's high capital intensity ($1.1–1.3 billion annually) means cash generation is highly sensitive to commodity prices, making leverage vulnerable in downturns. Reserve replacement remains unproven; annual production of 1,256 Bcfe against a 15-year reserve life implies the company must successfully develop approximately 6% of its reserve base annually just to maintain flat production. The HG Acquisition integration carries execution risk and could destroy value if synergies fail to materialize. Firm transportation and minimum volume commitments create fixed cost burdens that compress margins during low-price periods. Regulatory headwinds from climate policy and hydraulic fracturing restrictions could increase costs or limit market access. Antero Midstream's operational separation limits management control and creates dependence on a partner's capital allocation decisions. Long-term structural decline in natural gas demand amid the energy transition poses existential risk to the business model.
Generated with artificial intelligence on September 21, 2026, shared with all users
Direct competitors
Who this company fights with for the same customers
Generated with artificial intelligence on September 18, 2026, shared with all users
EQT is the other large Appalachian pure-play producer, drilling the same Marcellus and Utica acreage in West Virginia, Pennsylvania and Ohio and selling its gas into the same regional pipelines and LNG-linked outlets that Antero supplies.
Born from the Chesapeake–Southwestern merger, Expand Energy is the largest US natural gas producer and holds the Appalachian acreage Southwestern brought in, so it competes with Antero for the same gas buyers, the same pipeline capacity and the same LNG feedgas contracts.
Range Resources works the wet-gas window of the Marcellus in south-west Pennsylvania and is, like Antero, one of the few large producers of ethane and propane in Appalachia, so the two sell into the same NGL market.
CNX is an Appalachian-only gas producer operating Marcellus and Utica wells in the same states, competing with Antero for acreage, drilling services and firm transportation out of the basin.
Coterra's Marcellus operations in north-east Pennsylvania make it one of the largest dry-gas producers in the basin, selling into the same north-eastern and Gulf Coast gas markets as Antero.
Ascent Resources is the largest privately held Utica Shale operator in Ohio, drilling liquids-rich wells next to Antero's own Ohio acreage and competing for the same leases and midstream capacity.
Balance Sheet & Liquidity
Revenue
$6.13B
Trailing 12 months (through 6/30/2026)
Net Income
$1.12B
Trailing 12 months (through 6/30/2026)
Free Cash Flow
-
Total Equity
$7.55B
Total Liabilities
$5.53B
Current Ratio
0.40
Interest Coverage
-
Debt/EBITDA
2.83
Earnings Per Share
Revenue & Net Income
Free Cash Flow
Income Breakdown
Historical statement
Margins over time
Debt over time
How heavy the debt is
Growth grid
Growth — Revenue
Fair Value Estimation
Fair Value
$44.16
Current Price
$40.16
Margin of Safety
+9.1%
Fair Value Range
$38.86 - $49.46
Spread across the valuation methods used, not a statistically calibrated confidence interval.
Estimation Methods
Valuation Metrics
P/E Ratio
11.51
ROE
8.9%
P/B Ratio
1.48
P/FCF
-
Gross Margin
-
ROIC
8.8%
Profitability Radar
Value Creation (Economic Moat)
ROIC
8.8%
WACC
5.8%
ROIC − WACC
+3.1 pp
ROIC exceeds the cost of capital — the company is creating value for shareholders.
Fundamental Analysis Criteria
Passed (16)
- EPS shows upward trend
- ROIC 8.8%
- P/B ratio 1.48
- Debt/equity ratio
- Operating margin 24.7%
- Debt/EBITDA
- Return on tangible assets
- Low reliance on intangibles
- Price below Graham Number
- DCF valuation (Undervalued)
- ROE 13.9%
- Revenue growth 5Y 8.6%
- Earnings quality (operating cash flow / net income) 1.76
- Share dilution -36.2%
- Net margin trend 18.3% vs 10.7%
- Piotroski F-Score 8/9
Failed (4)
- EPS CAGR 2.18%
- Price CAGR 4.47%
- Current ratio
- Earnings surprise, average -18.1%
Unavailable (7)
- Gross margin –
- P/FCF –
- Dividend payout –
- Positive free cash flow
- CapEx intensity
- Interest coverage
- PEG ratio (needs P/E > 0 and growth > 0)
Piotroski F-Score
Strong financial health
Earnings Quality
High quality: earnings backed by cash
Share Dilution
Buying back shares. Shareholder friendly
Institutional Holdings
Governance
Executive Team
| Name | Title | Age |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Michael N. Kennedy | CEO, President & Director | 50 |
| Mr. Paul M. Rady | Co-Founder & Chairman Emeritus | 71 |
| Mr. Brendan E. Krueger | CFO, Senior VP of Finance & Treasurer | 40 |
| Ms. Yvette K. Schultz J.D. | Chief Compliance Officer, Senior VP of Legal, General Counsel & Corporate Secretary | 43 |
| Mr. Jon S. McEvers | Senior Vice President of Operations | - |
| Ms. Sheri L. Pearce | Senior VP of Accounting & Chief Accounting Officer | 58 |
| Mr. Biren Kumar | Chief Information Officer | 58 |
| Mr. Daniel Philip Katzenberg | Director of Finance and Investor Relations | - |
| Mr. Steven M. Woodward | Senior Vice President of Business Development | 66 |
| Mr. W. Patrick Ash | Senior Vice President of Reserves, Planning & Midstream | 46 |
Audit Risk
6
Board Risk
3
Compensation Risk
3
Shareholder Rights Risk
7
Documents
- View document
Annual Report (10-K)
A yearly overview of the business, its financial results, and the risks it faces.
Filed on 2026-02-11
- View document
Quarterly Report (10-Q)
A snapshot of financial performance for the most recent three-month period.
Filed on 2026-07-29
- View document
Current Report (8-K)
An announcement of a major event, such as a leadership change or big news.
Filed on 2026-07-29
via SEC EDGAR
Income History
via SEC EDGAR
Part 2 · The price and its context
This part shows how the price has behaved, not whether the company is worth owning. Inside: technical analysis, potential, historical drawdowns, gamma exposure.
Market Reaction Profile
How much AR moves, measured on its daily prices.
More volatile than 46% of the tracked stocks (90-day volatility).
- Volatility 30d
- 41.7%
- Volatility 90d
- 34.8%
- Beta vs S&P 500 (1y)
- -0.37Correlation -0.12
- Max drawdown (12m)
- -26.4%
- ATR (14d, % of price)
- 3.07%
Earnings reactions
How AR moved around its past quarterly results.
Next earnings release
Oct 28, 2026 · In 4 days · After the close
EPS estimate: 0.98Revenue estimate: $1.6B
What usually happens
- Over the last 12 releases the stock moved a median of 3.5% the next day, up or down.
- Next-day moves: up 7, down 5 (out of 12).
Release history
| Date | When | EPS est. | EPS actual | Surprise | Gap | 1 day | 5 days |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 29, 2026 | After the close | 0.84 | 0.76 | -10.0% | -1.1% | +0.5% | -2.3% |
| Apr 29, 2026 | After the close | 1.16 | 1.15 | -0.6% | -1.3% | +0.6% | -5.6% |
| Feb 11, 2026 | After the close | 0.52 | 0.43 | -16.6% | -2.8% | -3.7% | -0.2% |
| Oct 29, 2025 | After the close | 0.27 | 0.15 | -45.2% | -4.5% | -5.0% | +3.8% |
| Jul 30, 2025 | After the close | n/a | n/a | n/a | +0.9% | +3.3% | -2.4% |
| Apr 30, 2025 | After the close | n/a | n/a | n/a | +0.1% | -0.5% | +5.4% |
| Feb 12, 2025 | After the close | n/a | n/a | n/a | -1.6% | +2.0% | +0.3% |
| Oct 30, 2024 | After the close | n/a | n/a | n/a | -1.8% | -8.3% | +1.5% |
| Jul 31, 2024 | After the close | n/a | n/a | n/a | +1.9% | -0.9% | -12.8% |
| Apr 24, 2024 | After the close | n/a | n/a | n/a | +1.8% | +6.2% | +3.9% |
| Feb 14, 2024 | After the close | n/a | n/a | n/a | +6.9% | +10.9% | +21.1% |
| Oct 25, 2023 | After the close | n/a | n/a | n/a | -2.3% | +4.8% | +5.9% |
Release dates from SEC 8-K filings.
Updated 10/24/2026
Historical statistics for educational purposes only. They are not forecasts and not investment advice.
Price reaction to the news
Latest news on AR and what the price did next.
Return of the stock minus return of SPY over the same days. A news item close to a price move did not necessarily cause it. Historical data for educational purposes only, not investment advice.
Latest News
Recent headlines for AR.