Back to rankings

EQT Corp (EQT)

Fair Value
EnergyOil & Gas E&PUnited States

Fundamental

76

Price

$55.63

Market Cap

$33.82B

Part 1 · What the company is worth

Overview

EQT Corporation is a vertically integrated natural gas producer headquartered in Pennsylvania, focused on the Appalachian Basin. The company operates three segments: upstream production of natural gas, natural gas liquids, and oil; midstream gathering services via pipeline infrastructure; and transmission operations. As of 2024, EQT controlled approximately 26.3 trillion cubic feet equivalent of proved reserves across 2.1 million gross acres and operated roughly 2,925 miles of pipeline infrastructure.

How it makes money

EQT generates revenue from three channels: sales of extracted natural gas, natural gas liquids, and oil to end-users and intermediaries; gathering fees for transportation services moving produced hydrocarbons through owned pipeline networks; and transmission fees for throughput across transmission systems. The production segment dominates total revenues, while gathering and transmission provide more stable, annuity-like cash flows.

Revenue by segment

Production83.8%

Extraction and sale of natural gas, natural gas liquids, and crude oil from the Marcellus Shale and other formations in the Appalachian Basin, which holds approximately 92% of EQT's proved reserves.

Gathering12.5%

Transportation services that collect natural gas and liquids from production wells through gathering pipelines owned and operated by EQT, generating revenue from throughput volumes and fees.

Transmission3.7%

Long-distance transmission pipeline operations that move natural gas across the regional transmission system to end-users and distribution companies, generating revenue from capacity charges and throughput fees.

Competitive moat

Scale · Wide

EQT is positioned as the only large-scale, vertically integrated natural gas producer in the United States. Its scale advantages include: contiguous ownership of approximately 92% of proved reserves within the Marcellus Shale formation, enabling efficient combo-development of multiple well pads; proprietary pipeline infrastructure reducing transportation costs; a cost structure enabling profitability as the 'lowest-cost producer of natural gas'; and proprietary digital capabilities in drilling execution and field operations. The company has identified 3,600 gross undeveloped drilling locations representing 30+ years of development visibility, creating durable barriers to competitive replication.

What drives demand

Moderately cyclical

Natural gas demand has both defensive and cyclical components. Defensive demand comes from residential and commercial heating (particularly seasonal in northeastern U.S.), baseload power generation as coal plants retire, and essential industrial/chemical feedstock uses. Cyclical demand comes from petrochemical production and manufacturing activity tied to economic cycles. Growth tailwinds include expanding U.S. LNG export capacity and increasing global demand for natural gas, providing multi-year demand visibility, though LNG markets themselves are subject to geopolitical and macroeconomic cycles.

Key risks

  • Commodity price volatility — Changes in natural gas, natural gas liquids, and oil prices substantially affect revenues, operating income, and asset valuations. Lower prices could result in non-cash impairments to the book value of oil and gas properties. The company's Standardized Measure of discounted future net cash flows declined from $40.1 billion in 2022 to $8.0 billion in 2024, illustrating the materiality of price sensitivity.
  • Geographic concentration — Majority of assets, infrastructure, and customers are concentrated in the Appalachian Basin, creating vulnerability to region-specific disruptions, including potential water contamination concerns, local opposition to development, or region-specific economic factors.
  • Energy transition and regulatory risk — Growing consumer demand for alternatives to natural gas and negative public perception of fossil fuels could adversely impact demand and earnings. Increasing environmental regulations, methane emissions requirements, and potential restrictions on natural gas infrastructure could materially increase compliance costs or limit operational flexibility.
  • Capital intensity and financial leverage — Operations require substantial ongoing capital investment to maintain and develop reserves. The company carries significant leverage requiring sustained cash generation; commodity price stress could impair the ability to meet debt obligations while maintaining development programs and shareholder returns.

Customer concentration

The 10-K does not disclose specific customer concentration percentages. The company references exposure to 'non-end users' (intermediaries and distributors) as a concentration risk factor but does not quantify top customer exposure.

The case for

Buyers argue that EQT's vertically integrated, low-cost structure provides resilience and cash generation across commodity price cycles. The company generated $2.8 billion in operating cash flows in 2024 and is targeting debt reduction to $5 billion by end of 2025 while maintaining shareholder dividends and buybacks. The 30+ year drilling inventory provides multi-decade development visibility with reduced exploration risk. LNG export capacity is expanding significantly, and EQT is well-positioned to benefit from growing global natural gas demand. The cost advantage enables profitability at lower natural gas prices than most competitors, while the midstream segments provide downside protection through stable, annuity-like cash flows during commodity downturns.

The case against

Sellers fear that EQT's revenues and valuations are highly dependent on volatile natural gas prices, which have declined significantly from 2022 peaks and remain depressed relative to historical levels. The company explicitly warns of impairment risk: the Standardized Measure of proved reserve value collapsed from $40.1 billion in 2022 to $8.0 billion in 2024, demonstrating the magnitude of downside exposure. Long-term structural decline in fossil fuel demand as renewable energy adoption accelerates and electrification progresses could reduce natural gas demand trajectory below historical levels. Geographic concentration in the Appalachian Basin creates vulnerability to region-specific disruptions. Sustained capital requirements and significant leverage create financial stress if commodity prices remain weak or decline further, potentially forcing reductions in development programs or shareholder returns.

Segment figures from fiscal year 2024Sources: EQT Corporation Form 10-K for fiscal year ended December 31, 2024

Generated with artificial intelligence on September 21, 2026, shared with all users

Direct competitors

Who this company fights with for the same customers

Compare

Generated with artificial intelligence on September 18, 2026, shared with all users

P/E: 6.9Score: 81Market cap: $22.35B

Expand Energy, formed by the Chesapeake–Southwestern merger, is the other giant of American dry-gas production and sells into the same Appalachian and Gulf Coast LNG markets EQT supplies.

P/E: 11.5Score: 86Market cap: $11.84B

Antero drills the same Marcellus acreage in West Virginia and Pennsylvania and competes with EQT for drilling rights, pipeline capacity and the same gas buyers.

Range Resources CorporationRRC

Range is a pure-play Marcellus producer in south-west Pennsylvania, EQT's home ground, selling natural gas and liquids to the same regional and export customers.

CNX Resources CorporationCNX

Also headquartered in Pittsburgh, CNX produces Marcellus and Utica gas across Pennsylvania, Ohio and West Virginia and bids against EQT for the same acreage and local gas contracts.

Ascent Resources Utica Holdings, LLCNot tracked

Ascent is one of the largest privately held producers in the Utica shale of Ohio, competing with EQT for Appalachian drilling inventory and pipeline takeaway even though its shares are not listed.

Balance Sheet & Liquidity

Revenue

$9.54B

Trailing 12 months (through 6/30/2026)

Net Income

$2.71B

Trailing 12 months (through 6/30/2026)

Free Cash Flow

$2.84B

Total Equity

$23.75B

Total Liabilities

$14.43B

Current Ratio

0.67

Interest Coverage

10.44

Debt/EBITDA

0.97

Earnings Per Share

Revenue & Net Income

Free Cash Flow

Income Breakdown

Historical statement

Margins over time

Debt over time

How heavy the debt is

Growth grid

Growth — Revenue

Fair Value Estimation

CyclicalFairly Valued

Fair Value

$62.18

Current Price

$55.63

Margin of Safety

+10.5%

Fair Value Range

$57.83 - $66.52

Spread across the valuation methods used, not a statistically calibrated confidence interval.

Estimation Methods

Analyst price target:$66.44
Discounted cash flow (DCF):Not applicable to this type of company
Earnings multiple (P/E):$54.64
Graham growth formula:Not applicable to this type of company
Earnings power value (EPV):$60.07
Justified P/B:Not applicable to this type of company
Dividend discount (Gordon):Not applicable to this type of company
P/FFO, funds from operations:Not applicable to this type of company
Mid-cycle earnings:Not enough data to compute it
Revenue multiple:Not applicable to this type of company
Last Earnings Surprise:-3.49%

Valuation Metrics

P/E Ratio

12.91

ROE

8.6%

P/B Ratio

1.38

P/FCF

9.26

Gross Margin

83.7%

ROIC

8.1%

Profitability Radar

Value Creation (Economic Moat)

ROIC

8.1%

WACC

8.1%

ROIC − WACC

+0.0 pp

ROIC is roughly in line with the cost of capital — the company is barely covering its capital cost.

Fundamental Analysis Criteria

Passed (19)

  • EPS shows upward trend
  • ROIC 8.1%
  • Gross margin 83.7%
  • P/FCF 9.26
  • P/B ratio 1.38
  • Debt/equity ratio
  • Operating margin 42.5%
  • Positive free cash flow
  • Interest coverage
  • Debt/EBITDA
  • Return on tangible assets
  • Low reliance on intangibles
  • Price below Graham Number
  • ROE 11.2%
  • Revenue growth 5Y 25.7%
  • Earnings surprise, average 11.8%
  • Earnings quality (operating cash flow / net income) 2.30
  • Net margin trend 28.4% vs 15.5%
  • Piotroski F-Score 8/9

Failed (6)

  • EPS CAGR 2.56%
  • Price CAGR 4.01%
  • CapEx intensity
  • Current ratio
  • DCF valuation (Overvalued)
  • Share dilution 20.2%

Unavailable (2)

  • Dividend payout –
  • PEG ratio (needs P/E > 0 and growth > 0)

Piotroski F-Score

8/9

Strong financial health

ROA > 0
Operating cash flow > 0
ΔROA > 0
Cash flow > net income
Leverage ↓
Current ratio ↑
No dilution
Gross margin ↑
Asset turnover ↑

Earnings Quality

2.30

High quality: earnings backed by cash

Share Dilution

20.2%

Issuing new shares, diluting ownership

Institutional Holdings

Governance

Executive Team

NameTitleAge
Mr. Toby Z. RicePresident, CEO & Director43
Mr. Jeremy T. KnopChief Financial Officer36
Mr. J. E.B. BolenExecutive Vice President of Operations46
Mr. William E. JordanChief Legal, Policy Officer & Corporate Secretary45
Ms. Sarah FentonExecutive Vice President of Upstream46
Mr. Todd M. JamesChief Accounting Officer42
Mr. Richard Anthony DuranChief Information & Technology Officer46
Mr. Cameron Jeffrey Horwitz C.F.A.Managing Director of Investor Relations & Strategy-
Ms. Lesley EvanchoChief Human Resources Officer47
Ms. Amy RogersHead of Strategic Communications-

Audit Risk

8

Board Risk

9

Compensation Risk

1

Shareholder Rights Risk

5

Documents

  • Annual Report (10-K)

    A yearly overview of the business, its financial results, and the risks it faces.

    Filed on 2026-02-18

    View document
  • Quarterly Report (10-Q)

    A snapshot of financial performance for the most recent three-month period.

    Filed on 2026-07-22

    View document
  • Current Report (8-K)

    An announcement of a major event, such as a leadership change or big news.

    Filed on 2026-10-13

    View document

via SEC EDGAR

Income History

via SEC EDGAR

Part 2 · The price and its context

This part shows how the price has behaved, not whether the company is worth owning. Inside: technical analysis, potential, historical drawdowns, gamma exposure.

Market Reaction Profile

How much EQT moves, measured on its daily prices.

VolatilityMedium

More volatile than 28% of the tracked stocks (90-day volatility).

Volatility 30d
29.9%
Volatility 90d
28.0%
Beta vs S&P 500 (1y)
0.02Correlation 0.01
Max drawdown (12m)
-28.5%
ATR (14d, % of price)
2.54%

Earnings reactions

How EQT moved around its past quarterly results.

Next earnings release

Oct 27, 2026 · In 3 days · After the close

EPS estimate: 0.36Revenue estimate: $1.8B

What usually happens

  • Over the last 12 releases the stock moved a median of 3.2% the next day, up or down.
  • Next-day moves: up 9, down 3 (out of 12).

Release history

DateWhen EPS est.EPS actualSurprise Gap 1 day5 days
Jul 21, 2026After the close0.400.39-3.5% +2.6% +8.5% +3.7%
Apr 21, 2026After the close2.102.33+11.0% +2.3% +3.1% +4.3%
Feb 17, 2026After the close0.750.90+20.0% -2.5% +1.5% +1.1%
Oct 21, 2025After the close0.430.52+19.8% -0.7% -4.0% -6.3%
Jul 22, 2025After the closen/an/an/a-1.9% -4.4% -2.3%
Apr 22, 2025After the closen/an/an/a+3.0% +0.4% +5.5%
Feb 18, 2025After the closen/an/an/a+2.2% +0.9% -9.2%
Oct 29, 2024After the closen/an/an/a-0.1% +3.4% +0.6%
Jul 23, 2024After the closen/an/an/a+1.6% +0.1% -0.7%
Apr 23, 2024After the closen/an/an/a+1.6% +3.8% +5.6%
Feb 13, 2024After the closen/an/an/a-4.0% -3.3% +9.4%
Oct 25, 2023After the closen/an/an/a-3.6% +1.9% +1.7%

Release dates from SEC 8-K filings.

Updated 10/24/2026

Historical statistics for educational purposes only. They are not forecasts and not investment advice.

Price reaction to the news

Latest news on EQT and what the price did next.

Return of the stock minus return of SPY over the same days. A news item close to a price move did not necessarily cause it. Historical data for educational purposes only, not investment advice.

Latest News

Recent headlines for EQT.

  • 7/3/2026POSITIVE
    CPP Invests $1.75 Billion in EQT’s AI Infrastructure Buildout

    Canada Pension Plan Investment Board (CPP) has committed $1.75 billion to EQT Corporation to fund its artificial intelligence infrastructure buildout. This substantial investment highlights strong confidence in EQT's strategic direction and its potential to capitalize on the growing AI market. The capital infusion is expected to accelerate EQT's development of critical AI-focused infrastructure, potentially leading to enhanced operational efficiencies and new revenue streams. Investors will be watching EQT's progress in deploying these funds and its subsequent impact on market position and profitability.

  • 4/22/2026NEUTRAL
    EQT Reports Q1 2026 Results: Full Earnings Call Transcript

    EQT Corporation released its Q1 2026 earnings call transcript on April 22, 2026. The document provides a detailed account of the company's financial performance, strategic initiatives, and outlook for the upcoming quarters. Investors and analysts can review the transcript for in-depth insights into EQT's operational efficiency, capital allocation strategies, and market positioning within the natural gas sector. While the transcript itself is informational, it does not contain new financial figures or forward-looking statements that would directly impact the stock price at the time of its release.

  • 3/23/2026NEUTRAL
    EQT CEO Toby Rice on Energy Prices, LNG and Data Centers at CERAWeek

    EQT Corporation CEO Toby Rice participated in discussions at CERAWeek in Houston, addressing key topics including energy prices, the future of Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG), and the increasing energy consumption of data centers. The conversation, moderated by Bloomberg's Julie Fine, provided insights into the strategic considerations and market dynamics influencing the energy sector. While no specific financial figures or forward-looking guidance were released, the dialogue highlighted EQT's engagement with critical industry trends and their potential impact on future energy demand and supply.

  • 3/1/2026POSITIVE
    Japan Pledges to Invest $36 Billion in U.S. Oil, Gas, and Mineral Projects. Here Are 2 Stocks That Could Soar as a Result.

    Japan has pledged a substantial $36 billion investment in U.S. oil, gas, and mineral projects. This strategic move aims to bolster Japan's energy security and critical resource supply while simultaneously creating significant opportunities for American companies. Among the potential beneficiaries of this massive capital injection, EQT Corporation, the largest natural gas producer in the United States, has been highlighted as one of the companies poised to gain significantly. The Japanese investment could translate into increased demand for EQT's resources and services, potentially driving its stock value higher. Investors should closely monitor the development of these projects and their impact on the financials of the involved companies.

  • 2/26/2026POSITIVE
    If You Invested $100 In EQT Stock 5 Years Ago, You Would Have This Much Today

    A retrospective analysis of EQT Corporation's stock performance over the past five years suggests a significant appreciation for long-term investors. While specific return figures were not disclosed, the article's tone indicates that an initial $100 investment would have yielded substantial gains. This highlights the company's resilience and growth potential within the energy sector, particularly in natural gas. For investors, this underscores the importance of a long-term perspective and the potential rewards from selecting companies with strong fundamentals and a strategic market position. EQT's past performance could attract new capital, further solidifying its standing among leading natural gas producers in the United States.