Eversource Energy (ES)
OvervaluedFundamental
56
Price
$67.46
Market Cap
$24.71B
Part 1 · What the company is worth
Overview
Eversource Energy is a regulated utility holding company serving approximately 3.6 million customers across Connecticut, Massachusetts, and New Hampshire. The company operates through wholly-owned utility subsidiaries—including The Connecticut Light and Power Company, NSTAR Electric Company, Public Service Company of New Hampshire, and Aquarion water utility—providing electricity distribution and transmission, natural gas distribution, and water utility services in regulated service territories with geographic monopolies.
How it makes money
Eversource operates primarily through regulated rate-setting mechanisms in its service territories. Revenue is derived from electricity distribution (both delivery and transmission), natural gas distribution, water utility services, and renewable energy investments. The company operates under a cost-recovery regulatory framework with rate-based returns approved by state public utility commissions, ensuring stable, predictable revenues with limited competitive exposure.
Revenue by segment
Distribution of electricity to residential, commercial, and industrial customers across Connecticut, Massachusetts, and New Hampshire through local distribution networks operated by subsidiary companies including CL&P, NSTAR Electric, and PSNH.
High-voltage transmission of electricity across the service territory, connecting generation sources to distribution networks. Includes over 3,200 miles of high-voltage transmission lines serving wholesale and retail customers.
Distribution of natural gas to residential, commercial, and industrial customers through subsidiary companies including NSTAR Gas, Eversource Gas Company of Massachusetts, and Yankee Gas Services Company operating in Connecticut, Massachusetts, and New Hampshire.
Water utility services provided through Aquarion Company, supplying potable water and wastewater services to residential and commercial customers in Connecticut, Massachusetts, and New Hampshire.
Competitive moat
Switching costs · WideEversource operates as a regulated monopoly with geographic exclusivity in its service territories across three states. High barriers to entry include: (1) regulatory approvals requiring 3–7 years for new infrastructure, (2) substantial sunk costs of interconnected distribution and transmission grids, (3) institutional expertise in multi-state utility regulation, (4) exclusive franchises granted by municipalities that are difficult to replace. Customers have no alternative providers and cannot switch between distributors, creating infrastructure-level lock-in. The regulated cost-recovery framework provides rate-based returns with transparent cost allocation, making the business model predictable and defensible.
What drives demand
Moderately cyclicalEversource operates in a moderately cyclical industry. Electricity and gas consumption vary with heating and cooling degree days—winter heating demands and summer cooling demands drive seasonal consumption patterns. Commercial and industrial customer demand correlates with regional economic growth and business activity levels. Weather-normalized electricity demand has increased approximately 2% in Eversource's service territories, driven by electrification trends (electric vehicles and heat pumps) and population growth. The company benefits from essential infrastructure status: even during economic downturns, electricity and gas remain necessity services, providing some defensive characteristics.
Key risks
- Regulatory and Rate-Setting Risks — Changes in laws, regulations, or regulatory decisions by state public utility commissions may impact approved returns on equity, cost recovery mechanisms, and compliance costs. Stricter regulatory oversight and increased scrutiny on rate cases could hinder Eversource's ability to generate robust earnings growth.
- Weather and Catastrophic Event Exposure — Severe weather and climate change effects can damage facilities and require costly repairs and infrastructure replacement. While regulatory mechanisms exist for cost recovery of storm restoration, recovery timelines and full reimbursement are subject to regulatory approval and may not cover all expenses, impacting profitability.
- Renewable Energy Mandate Costs and Stranded Investments — Increasing state-mandated renewable energy requirements may require higher compliance payments or alternative compliance costs if renewable generation fails to meet expectations. Stranded costs from renewable energy projects (such as offshore wind) that underperform or are divested could result in write-downs and reduced returns on capital.
- Cybersecurity and Critical Infrastructure Risks — Sophisticated cyberattacks targeting Eversource's systems or critical infrastructure could result in unauthorized access to confidential information, operational disruptions, service interruptions, or regulatory violations. Recovery and response costs could be substantial.
- Goodwill Impairment Risk — Eversource carries significant goodwill of $3.57 billion as of December 31, 2024, which is subject to periodic impairment testing. Adverse changes in market conditions, regulatory decisions, or company performance could trigger impairment write-downs that would negatively impact shareholders' equity and reported earnings.
- Parent Company Losses and Leverage — Following the 2024 offshore wind divestiture, Eversource's parent company reported a loss of $81 million in 2025 due to higher interest rates and loss of capitalized interest. Rising interest rates increase the parent company's cost of capital, and weak interest coverage coupled with a dividend not fully covered by free cash flow raise sustainability concerns.
Customer concentration
Eversource serves approximately 4.4 million electric, natural gas, and water customers across Connecticut, Massachusetts, and New Hampshire with highly diversified customer base. The company does not disclose concentration metrics for individual large customers in its public filings, indicating that no single customer represents a material percentage of consolidated revenues. Revenue is distributed across residential customers (the largest segment by account count, approximately 45–50% of electric revenues), commercial customers (approximately 25–30% of electric revenues), industrial customers, and wholesale operations. This geographic and customer-type diversification minimizes concentration risk.
The case for
Buyers argue that Eversource is benefiting from its disciplined transition to a pure-play regulated utility with a $26.5 billion five-year capital program, supporting steady long-term earnings growth of 5–7% annually. The company has demonstrated strong relationships with state regulators and a proven track record of securing favorable rate decisions. Renewable energy investments align with New England's decarbonization targets, creating multi-year growth opportunities. The regulated cost-recovery model provides stable, predictable cash flows with rate-based returns insulated from commodity price volatility. Grid modernization and infrastructure replacement in aging networks represent decades of capital deployment opportunities. Strong market fundamentals—essential services, geographic monopolies, favorable demographics, electrification trends—support durable cash generation.
The case against
Sellers fear that Eversource faces intensifying regulatory headwinds and stricter oversight in New England, including increased scrutiny on rate cases and constrained approved returns on equity, potentially limiting earnings growth below management guidance. The company carries weak interest coverage with a 4.7% dividend that is not fully covered by free cash flow, raising sustainability concerns. The 2024 offshore wind divestiture created stranded costs and parent-company losses ($81 million in 2025) that may persist if interest rates remain elevated. The loss of capitalized interest compounds balance sheet pressures. Slow adoption or delays in regional renewable energy initiatives could expose Eversource to additional stranded project costs. Rising interest rates increase refinancing risks and the cost of capital for future investment programs. Regulatory uncertainty around permitted return on equity and cost recovery mechanisms could constrain profitability below historical levels, making the business less attractive than peer utilities.
Generated with artificial intelligence on September 21, 2026, shared with all users
Direct competitors
Who this company fights with for the same customers
Generated with artificial intelligence on September 18, 2026, shared with all users
Its Rhode Island Energy subsidiary is the main electric and gas delivery utility in Rhode Island, putting it in the same ISO New England delivery business and the same regional transmission build-out as Eversource.
A Northeast regulated electric and gas delivery utility of comparable scale, competing with Eversource for the same regional transmission projects and for the capital that funds them.
Through United Illuminating and its Connecticut gas utilities it delivers electricity and gas in the same Connecticut towns and New England states as Eversource, and the two bid against each other for regional transmission projects and rate-base growth before the same regulators.
Its US arm delivers electricity and gas to Massachusetts customers next door to Eversource's territory and is the largest gas distributor in the Northeast, competing for the same New England delivery customers and transmission investment.
A smaller regulated electric and gas distributor serving New Hampshire and Massachusetts communities adjacent to Eversource's, competing for the same residential and commercial delivery customers and the same state rate cases.
Balance Sheet & Liquidity
Revenue
$14.00B
Trailing 12 months (through 6/30/2026)
Net Income
$1.46B
Trailing 12 months (through 6/30/2026)
Free Cash Flow
$-45M
Total Equity
$16.20B
Total Liabilities
$47.59B
Current Ratio
0.80
Interest Coverage
2.20
Debt/EBITDA
5.47
Earnings Per Share
Revenue & Net Income
Free Cash Flow
Income Breakdown
Historical statement
Margins over time
Debt over time
How heavy the debt is
Growth grid
Growth — Revenue
Fair Value Estimation
Fair Value
$54.60
Current Price
$67.46
Margin of Safety
-23.6%
Fair Value Range
$35.49 - $73.71
Spread across the valuation methods used, not a statistically calibrated confidence interval.
Estimation Methods
Valuation Metrics
P/E Ratio
17.52
ROE
10.5%
P/B Ratio
1.56
P/FCF
85.35
Gross Margin
-
ROIC
4.3%
Profitability Radar
Value Creation (Economic Moat)
ROIC
4.3%
WACC
5.6%
ROIC − WACC
-1.3 pp
ROIC is below the cost of capital — the company is destroying value for every dollar invested.
Fundamental Analysis Criteria
Passed (15)
- EPS shows upward trend
- EPS CAGR 5.59%
- P/B ratio 1.56
- Debt/equity ratio
- Operating margin 21.5%
- Positive free cash flow
- Current ratio
- Interest coverage
- Debt/EBITDA
- Low reliance on intangibles
- ROE 8.8%
- Revenue growth 5Y 8.8%
- Earnings quality (operating cash flow / net income) 3.04
- Net margin trend 10.4% vs 6.7%
- Piotroski F-Score 6/9
Failed (10)
- Price CAGR 1.90%
- ROIC 4.3%
- P/FCF 85.35
- CapEx intensity
- Return on tangible assets
- Price below Graham Number
- DCF valuation (Overvalued)
- Earnings surprise, average -20.4%
- PEG ratio 3.31
- Share dilution 3.3%
Unavailable (2)
- Gross margin –
- Dividend payout –
Piotroski F-Score
Mixed signals: some areas need attention
Earnings Quality
High quality: earnings backed by cash
Share Dilution
Issuing new shares, diluting ownership
Institutional Holdings
Governance
Executive Team
| Name | Title | Age |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Joseph R. Nolan Jr. | President, CEO & Chairman | 61 |
| Mr. John M. Moreira CPA | Executive VP. CFO & Treasurer | 63 |
| Mr. Paul Chodak III | Executive VP & COO | 61 |
| Mr. Gregory B. Butler Esq., J.D. | Executive VP & General Counsel | 67 |
| Mr. James W. Hunt III, J.D. | Executive VP of Customer Relations & Sustainability and Secretary | 53 |
| Mr. Jay S. Buth | VP, Controller & Chief Accounting Officer | 55 |
| Ms. Rima Hyder | Vice President of Investor Relations | 49 |
| Mr. Duncan R. MacKay J.D. | Chief Compliance Officer & Deputy General Counsel | - |
| Ms. Susan L. Sgroi | Executive VP of Human Resources & Information Technology | 60 |
| Ms. Penelope McLean-Conner | Executive Vice President of Customer Experience & Energy Strategy | 61 |
Audit Risk
7
Board Risk
6
Compensation Risk
7
Shareholder Rights Risk
3
Documents
- View document
Annual Report (10-K)
A yearly overview of the business, its financial results, and the risks it faces.
Filed on 2026-02-17
- View document
Quarterly Report (10-Q)
A snapshot of financial performance for the most recent three-month period.
Filed on 2026-08-03
- View document
Current Report (8-K)
An announcement of a major event, such as a leadership change or big news.
Filed on 2026-07-30
via SEC EDGAR
Income History
via SEC EDGAR
Part 2 · The price and its context
This part shows how the price has behaved, not whether the company is worth owning. Inside: technical analysis, potential, historical drawdowns, gamma exposure.
Market Reaction Profile
How much ES moves, measured on its daily prices.
More volatile than 7% of the tracked stocks (90-day volatility).
- Volatility 30d
- 21.9%
- Volatility 90d
- 19.9%
- Beta vs S&P 500 (1y)
- 0.03Correlation 0.01
- Max drawdown (12m)
- -17.0%
- ATR (14d, % of price)
- 1.93%
Earnings reactions
How ES moved around its past quarterly results.
Next earnings release
Nov 4, 2026 · In 11 days · Time not known
EPS estimate: 0.92Revenue estimate: $3.2B
What usually happens
- Over the last 12 releases the stock moved a median of 2.1% the next day, up or down.
- Next-day moves: up 4, down 8 (out of 12).
Release history
| Date | When | EPS est. | EPS actual | Surprise | Gap | 1 day | 5 days |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 2026 | After the close | 0.92 | 0.36 | -60.9% | -2.5% | -3.0% | -2.4% |
| May 6, 2026 | After the close | 1.65 | 1.61 | -2.4% | -1.2% | -2.2% | -0.4% |
| Feb 12, 2026 | After the close | 1.15 | 1.12 | -2.5% | +1.5% | +4.3% | +4.6% |
| Nov 4, 2025 | After the close | 1.16 | 0.98 | -15.9% | +0.2% | -1.2% | -0.7% |
| Jul 31, 2025 | After the close | n/a | n/a | n/a | +0.7% | -0.8% | -0.3% |
| May 1, 2025 | After the close | n/a | n/a | n/a | -0.5% | -0.4% | +6.1% |
| Feb 11, 2025 | After the close | n/a | n/a | n/a | -2.3% | -2.8% | +2.0% |
| Nov 4, 2024 | After the close | n/a | n/a | n/a | -0.6% | -2.1% | -3.6% |
| Jul 31, 2024 | After the close | n/a | n/a | n/a | -0.9% | +1.8% | +0.7% |
| May 1, 2024 | After the close | n/a | n/a | n/a | +1.6% | -1.4% | -0.9% |
| Feb 13, 2024 | After the close | n/a | n/a | n/a | +6.4% | +4.7% | +7.2% |
| Nov 6, 2023 | Before the open | n/a | n/a | n/a | -1.1% | +2.0% | -2.9% |
Release dates from SEC 8-K filings.
Updated 10/24/2026
Historical statistics for educational purposes only. They are not forecasts and not investment advice.
Price reaction to the news
Latest news on ES and what the price did next.
Return of the stock minus return of SPY over the same days. A news item close to a price move did not necessarily cause it. Historical data for educational purposes only, not investment advice.
Latest News
Recent headlines for ES.
- 2/23/2026NEUTRALEversource Raises $1.5 Billion From Its First Hybrid Bonds
Eversource Energy has successfully raised $1.5 billion through its inaugural hybrid bond issuance. The New England-based utility operator will use the proceeds to refinance existing debt, a strategic move aimed at optimizing its capital structure. The issuance of these instruments, which possess characteristics of both debt and equity, demonstrates the company's ability to tap into sophisticated and diversified financing channels. For investors, this action signals proactive financial management. While it doesn't directly affect daily operations, its impact on the balance sheet's strength and future interest expenses will be closely watched. Currently, the market views this as a standard financial maneuver rather than a short-term value catalyst.