Landstar System, Inc. (LSTR)
Fair ValueFundamental
65
Price
$165.79
Market Cap
$5.81B
Part 1 · What the company is worth
Overview
Landstar System is a technology-enabled, asset-light provider of integrated transportation management solutions. The company operates as an intermediary connecting customers with approximately 1,050 independent commission sales agents and over 78,000 third-party capacity providers globally. Rather than owning fleet assets, Landstar earns commissions and markups on transportation services including truckload (van and unsided/platform equipment), heavy haul, intermodal, air, and ocean services. In fiscal 2024, the company generated $4.8 billion in consolidated revenue.
How it makes money
Landstar earns revenue through commissions paid by customers for coordinating transportation services and markups on capacity costs from third-party providers. The company does not own significant transportation equipment. Revenue is generated from both BCO independent contractors (38% of total revenue) and truck brokerage carriers (52% of total revenue). The company also provides administrative services including customer contract administration, credit review, pricing, billing, collections, and safety management to both sales agents and capacity providers, generating additional service revenue.
Revenue by segment
The dominant business segment providing full-truckload transportation services via van equipment, unsided/platform equipment, and heavy haul services. Utilizes both BCO independent contractor capacity and third-party truck brokerage carriers.
Transportation logistics services including air freight and ocean freight forwarding. These services complement the company's ground-based trucking operations to provide integrated transportation solutions.
Intermodal transportation services combining rail and truck capacity for long-distance freight movement, leveraging third-party railroad and equipment providers.
Insurance services providing coverage and risk management to transportation industry participants, primarily BCO independent contractors and agents.
Competitive moat
Network effects · NarrowLandstar's moat operates through network effects created by its ecosystem of 1,050 independent sales agents and 78,000+ capacity providers—the largest network of independent agents in the asset-light integrated transportation sector. The company has invested $192 million since 2016 in proprietary cloud-based technology connecting agents and capacity providers. However, the moat is narrow: the asset-light business model is replicable, technology platforms can be copied by well-capitalized competitors, agent relationships can be contested by rivals, and capacity providers have low switching costs. Defensibility derives primarily from the cumulative advantage of network scale and established relationships rather than from structural barriers that prevent competitive entry.
What drives demand
CyclicalLandstar's demand is highly cyclical and directly sensitive to macroeconomic conditions. Freight volumes and rates fluctuate with overall economic activity, business capital expenditures, consumer spending, and inventory levels. During recessions, shippers reduce freight volumes and increase price competition. Fiscal 2024 exemplified this: challenging freight conditions persisted through Q3, with only seasonal improvement materializing in Q4. Supply chain normalization and trade policy—particularly tariffs and U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement provisions—further influence demand volatility.
Key risks
- Insurance Liability Escalation — Landstar retains self-insured retention of $5 million per commercial trucking claim. Third-party excess liability coverage costs increased approximately $22 million (400%+) since 2020. The trucking industry faces exposure to catastrophic 'nuclear verdicts' exceeding $10 million. A hypothetical $65 million claim would result in company exposure of approximately $30 million after insurance coverage. Rising insurance costs directly compress operational margins and may accelerate further due to industry-wide litigation trends.
- Agent and Revenue Concentration Risk — The company's largest independent sales agent generated approximately $470 million (10% of total fiscal 2024 revenue). This agent's administrative operations are located in Ukraine and have been impacted by the Russian invasion. Additionally, the top 100 customers represent approximately 46% of consolidated revenue. Loss or operational disruption of the largest agent or concentration of top customer base would significantly impact consolidated financial results.
- Capacity Provider Decline and Turnover — The number of trucks provided by BCO independent contractors declined from 9,809 at end of 2023 to 8,843 at end of 2024, a net loss of 966 trucks. BCO truck turnover rate was 35% in 2024, though improved from 41% in 2023. High turnover and declining fleet capacity constrain the company's ability to meet customer demand and scale operations. Capacity providers have minimal switching costs and can easily redirect capacity to competitors.
- Cyclical Freight Demand — The transportation industry experiences cyclical financial results directly tied to overall economic activity, customer freight volumes, and freight rate dynamics. During economic downturns, shippers reduce freight volumes and increase price pressure. Fiscal 2024 demonstrated this pattern, with challenging freight conditions through Q3 before Q4 seasonal recovery. The company has no long-term capacity or revenue guarantees with customers, creating vulnerability to cyclical economic swings.
- Regulatory and Environmental Compliance — Increasingly stringent regulations on diesel emissions and air quality, combined with emerging requirements for zero-emission vehicle purchases and deployment, increase capital expenditure requirements for Landstar's independent contractors and capacity providers. Compliance expenses may accelerate capacity provider attrition as industry participants struggle with higher equipment and operational costs, potentially reducing available capacity and increasing costs.
Customer concentration
Top customers account for 46% of revenue
The top 100 customers represent approximately 46% of consolidated revenue, indicating moderate-to-significant concentration at the customer level. The largest single independent sales agent generated approximately $470 million (10% of total revenue) in fiscal 2024. However, when examining individual end-customers rather than agents, no single customer exceeds 7% of revenue, providing meaningful diversification. The concentration risk exists primarily at the agent level rather than among end-customers, but agent-level disruption would still materially impact consolidated results.
The case for
Buyers argue that Landstar's asset-light model creates defensible competitive advantages competitors cannot easily replicate. The network of 1,050 sales agents and 78,000+ capacity providers represents the largest independent agent footprint in asset-light transportation, creating cumulative scale benefits. The $192 million investment in cloud-based technology since 2016 delivers operational leverage and supports pricing power. Fiscal 2024 demonstrated capacity for pricing recovery: despite challenging freight conditions through Q3, Q4 results showed sequential improvement and revenue-per-load gains, indicating the company can navigate cyclical downturns. The diverse customer base of top 100 customers (representing 46% of revenue) provides stable demand from large, sophisticated shippers with recurring transportation needs. The capital-efficient model generates superior returns on invested capital compared to asset-heavy competitors, enabling consistent shareholder returns through dividends and buybacks even during cyclical troughs.
The case against
Sellers fear that Landstar faces structural margin compression from accelerating insurance costs, which have increased $22 million (400%+) since 2020 with no clear ceiling. Industry-wide litigation trends and catastrophic verdict awards suggest costs will continue escalating, yet the company has limited ability to pass these costs entirely to price-sensitive customers. The concentration of 10% of revenue with a single agent whose Ukrainian operations face war-related disruption creates unquantifiable operational risk. The 35% annual BCO turnover rate and 966-truck net decline in 2024 indicate structural capacity constraints preventing growth. The cyclical nature of freight demand means any macroeconomic slowdown will severely pressure both volumes and rates; fiscal 2024 required waiting until Q4 to see meaningful recovery. Competition intensifies from both traditional carriers and online freight brokers, putting continuous pressure on margins. Annual technology investments of $34–35 million must deliver meaningful returns, but the digital platform is ultimately replicable and provides limited proprietary defensibility in an increasingly commoditized industry where competing on price becomes inevitable.
Generated with artificial intelligence on September 21, 2026, shared with all users
Direct competitors
Who this company fights with for the same customers
Generated with artificial intelligence on September 19, 2026, shared with all users
The largest North American truckload freight broker, competing for the same shippers' dry van, flatbed and refrigerated loads that Landstar's agents place with third-party carriers.
Competes both through its Integrated Capacity Solutions brokerage and its own truckload and intermodal capacity, offering shippers the guaranteed capacity Landstar must source from owner-operators and third-party carriers.
Sells brokered truckload and intermodal door-to-door service to the same North American shippers, competing directly with Landstar's truck brokerage and rail intermodal offerings.
An asset-light truck brokerage of comparable size to Landstar's brokerage business, which after absorbing Coyote Logistics bids for the same spot-market truckload freight from the same U.S. shippers.
A privately held broker, the second or third largest in the United States, that sells truckload capacity to the same mid-market shippers through a commission-driven sales force much like Landstar's agent network.
A large U.S. truckload carrier that pairs its own fleet with a growing brokerage and owner-operator capacity, courting the same dry van and specialized freight contracts Landstar bids on.
Balance Sheet & Liquidity
Revenue
$4.76B
Trailing 12 months (through 3/28/2026)
Net Income
$125M
Trailing 12 months (through 3/28/2026)
Free Cash Flow
$215M
Total Equity
$796M
Total Liabilities
$840M
Current Ratio
1.88
Interest Coverage
30.78
Debt/EBITDA
0.35
Earnings Per Share
Revenue & Net Income
Free Cash Flow
Income Breakdown
Historical statement
Margins over time
Debt over time
How heavy the debt is
Growth grid
Growth — Revenue
Fair Value Estimation
Fair Value
$156.36
Current Price
$165.79
Margin of Safety
-6.0%
Fair Value Range
$101.64 - $211.09
Spread across the valuation methods used, not a statistically calibrated confidence interval.
Estimation Methods
Valuation Metrics
P/E Ratio
45.80
ROE
14.5%
P/B Ratio
7.04
P/FCF
24.08
Gross Margin
-
ROIC
13.5%
Profitability Radar
Value Creation (Economic Moat)
ROIC
13.5%
WACC
9.2%
ROIC − WACC
+4.3 pp
ROIC exceeds the cost of capital — the company is creating value for shareholders.
Fundamental Analysis Criteria
Passed (16)
- EPS shows upward trend
- Price CAGR 6.95%
- ROIC 13.4%
- P/FCF 24.08
- Debt/equity ratio
- Positive free cash flow
- CapEx intensity
- Current ratio
- Interest coverage
- Debt/EBITDA
- Return on tangible assets
- Low reliance on intangibles
- ROE 15.9%
- Earnings quality (operating cash flow / net income) 1.98
- Share dilution -2.3%
- Piotroski F-Score 5/9
Failed (8)
- EPS CAGR 2.71%
- P/B ratio 7.04
- Operating margin 3.5%
- Price below Graham Number
- DCF valuation (Overvalued)
- Revenue growth 5Y 2.8%
- Earnings surprise, average -11.9%
- Net margin trend 2.6% vs 3.7%
Unavailable (3)
- Gross margin –
- Dividend payout –
- PEG ratio (needs P/E > 0 and growth > 0)
Piotroski F-Score
Mixed signals: some areas need attention
Earnings Quality
High quality: earnings backed by cash
Share Dilution
Buying back shares. Shareholder friendly
Institutional Holdings
Governance
Executive Team
| Name | Title | Age |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Frank A. Lonegro | President, CEO & Director | 56 |
| Mr. James P. Todd | VP, Principal Accounting Officer & CFO | 37 |
| Mr. Matthew Miller | VP and Chief Safety & Operations Officer | - |
| Mr. Ricardo S. Coro | VP & Chief Information Officer | 60 |
| Ms. Vallie S. Dugas | VP, General Counsel & Secretary | - |
| Ms. Terri M. Lewis | VP & Chief Human Resources Officer | 54 |
| Mr. James M. Applegate | Chief Strategy & Transformation Officer | 53 |
| Mr. Matthew M. Dannegger | VP & Chief Field Sales Officer | 55 |
| Ms. Cory Seay | Vice President of Corporate Services & Chief of Staff | - |
| Mr. William Clement | Vice President & Chief Commercial Officer | - |
Audit Risk
4
Board Risk
2
Compensation Risk
3
Shareholder Rights Risk
4
Documents
- View document
Annual Report (10-K)
A yearly overview of the business, its financial results, and the risks it faces.
Filed on 2026-02-24
- View document
Quarterly Report (10-Q)
A snapshot of financial performance for the most recent three-month period.
Filed on 2026-07-29
- View document
Current Report (8-K)
An announcement of a major event, such as a leadership change or big news.
Filed on 2026-07-28
via SEC EDGAR
Income History
via SEC EDGAR
Part 2 · The price and its context
This part shows how the price has behaved, not whether the company is worth owning. Inside: technical analysis, potential, historical drawdowns, gamma exposure.
Market Reaction Profile
How much LSTR moves, measured on its daily prices.
More volatile than 30% of the tracked stocks (90-day volatility).
- Volatility 30d
- 19.4%
- Volatility 90d
- 28.6%
- Beta vs S&P 500 (1y)
- 0.68Correlation 0.25
- Max drawdown (12m)
- -27.3%
- ATR (14d, % of price)
- 2.58%
Earnings reactions
How LSTR moved around its past quarterly results.
Next earnings release
Oct 27, 2026 · In 3 days · After the close
EPS estimate: 1.66Revenue estimate: $1.5B
What usually happens
- Over the last 12 releases the stock moved a median of 2.4% the next day, up or down.
- Next-day moves: up 2, down 10 (out of 12).
Release history
| Date | When | EPS est. | EPS actual | Surprise | Gap | 1 day | 5 days |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 28, 2026 | After the close | 1.51 | 1.44 | -4.6% | -2.6% | -4.0% | -2.0% |
| Apr 28, 2026 | After the close | 1.15 | 1.16 | +1.2% | +3.9% | +1.2% | -1.1% |
| Jan 28, 2026 | After the close | 1.25 | 0.70 | -43.8% | -3.2% | -2.3% | +5.2% |
| Oct 28, 2025 | After the close | 1.23 | 1.22 | -0.5% | -2.2% | -3.8% | -1.1% |
| Jul 29, 2025 | After the close | n/a | n/a | n/a | -2.5% | -3.3% | -5.4% |
| May 13, 2025 | Before the open | n/a | n/a | n/a | +2.9% | -2.5% | +0.3% |
| Jan 29, 2025 | After the close | n/a | n/a | n/a | -1.7% | -3.5% | -6.3% |
| Oct 29, 2024 | After the close | n/a | n/a | n/a | -2.7% | -1.9% | +0.1% |
| Jul 30, 2024 | After the close | n/a | n/a | n/a | -5.6% | -1.9% | -2.4% |
| Apr 25, 2024 | Before the open | n/a | n/a | n/a | +0.1% | +3.7% | +0.7% |
| Jan 31, 2024 | After the close | n/a | n/a | n/a | -1.4% | -0.4% | -0.7% |
| Oct 25, 2023 | After the close | n/a | n/a | n/a | 0.0% | -1.9% | -0.6% |
Release dates from SEC 8-K filings.
Updated 10/24/2026
Historical statistics for educational purposes only. They are not forecasts and not investment advice.
Price reaction to the news
Latest news on LSTR and what the price did next.
Return of the stock minus return of SPY over the same days. A news item close to a price move did not necessarily cause it. Historical data for educational purposes only, not investment advice.
Latest News
Recent headlines for LSTR.