Back to rankings

NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA)

Fair Value
TechnologySemiconductorsUnited States

Fundamental

73

Price

$210.96

Market Cap

$5.17T

Part 1 · What the company is worth

Overview

NVIDIA designs the processors that do the heavy arithmetic behind artificial intelligence, computer graphics and scientific computing. It does not own factories: it designs the chips and the software that runs on them, and has them manufactured by outside foundries. What began as a company selling graphics cards to gamers now sells complete systems — chips, networking and software — to the operators of the world's largest data centres, who use them to train and run AI models.

How it makes money

Revenue comes from selling hardware, not from subscriptions: NVIDIA books a sale when a customer takes delivery of a chip, a board or a complete server system. Because it designs rather than manufactures, its costs are largely research and foundry capacity, so each additional unit sold at a high price carries a very large margin. Its pricing power rests on being, for now, the only practical supplier of the performance the largest AI workloads require.

Revenue by segment

Data Center89.7%

Chips, networking and systems sold to cloud providers and large enterprises to train and run AI models. This is the business today.

Gaming7.4%

GeForce graphics cards for personal computers and chips for game consoles — the original business, now a small share of the whole.

Professional Visualization1.5%

Workstation graphics for engineers, architects and film studios, plus tools for building simulated environments.

Automotive1.1%

Computing platforms sold to carmakers for assisted and autonomous driving. Small today, with long lead times before revenue appears.

OEM and Other0.3%

Residual sales to equipment manufacturers that do not belong to the other four lines.

Competitive moat

Switching costs · Wide

For nearly twenty years, AI software has been written against CUDA, NVIDIA's programming layer. A competitor can match the silicon and still lose, because moving a research team's accumulated code and tooling to another platform costs months of work. The chips are replaceable; the habits built on top of them are the harder thing to dislodge.

What drives demand

Cyclical

Demand follows the investment budgets of a handful of very large technology companies. Those budgets are decided in multi-year cycles and can be cut quickly: the industry has repeatedly gone from shortage to glut within a few quarters. Revenue here is the consequence of someone else's capital spending decision, not of steady end-user consumption.

Key risks

  • Revenue concentrated in few buyers — The company states that its revenue is concentrated among a limited number of direct and indirect customers, and that the trend may continue. Losing one of them, or a pause in their spending, is not a marginal event.
  • Dependence on outside foundries — NVIDIA owns no fabrication plants and relies on third parties, concentrated in Taiwan, for manufacturing and advanced packaging. Capacity shortfalls or disruption at a supplier translate directly into lost sales.
  • Export controls and geopolitics — Government restrictions on selling advanced chips to certain countries have already removed markets from the company, and the rules can change without warning and without compensation.
  • Customers building their own chips — The same large customers that buy the most are designing internal alternatives. A buyer that becomes a competitor reduces demand and bargaining power at the same time.
  • Demand may not match capacity commitments — The company commits to supply and inventory well before orders are firm. If demand slows after those commitments, it carries the cost of capacity it can no longer sell.

Customer concentration

Top customers account for 36% of revenue

In fiscal 2026 one direct customer alone accounted for 22% of revenue and a second for 14%. A single buyer's change of plan therefore moves the whole company's results.

The case for

Buyers argue that the build-out of AI computing has years left to run, that CUDA keeps customers in place while rivals catch up on hardware, and that margins of this size on revenue growing 65% a year are evidence of pricing power rather than of a passing shortage.

The case against

Sellers fear that a handful of customers are funding almost all of this growth from capital budgets they can cut in a single quarter, that their in-house chip programmes erode both volume and price, and that today's margins assume a scarcity which additional foundry capacity is designed to end.

Written by the editors, published on August 18, 2026

Direct competitors

Who this company fights with for the same customers

Compare

Generated with artificial intelligence on August 22, 2026, shared with all users

P/E: 132.9Score: 74Market cap: $863.17B

AMD is the only other merchant supplier selling both data-center AI accelerators (Instinct MI series) and discrete gaming graphics cards (Radeon) to the same cloud operators, PC makers and gamers NVIDIA sells to.

P/E: 41.0Score: 73Market cap: $1.57T

Broadcom designs the custom AI accelerators (XPUs) and the Ethernet switching silicon that the largest cloud companies buy instead of NVIDIA GPUs and NVIDIA networking gear for their AI data centers.

P/E: 15.9Score: 69Market cap: $4.12T

Google's TPU line is sold as an alternative to NVIDIA GPUs for training and running AI models, both rented through Google Cloud and, increasingly, placed in customers' own data centres.

P/E: —Score: 49Market cap: $453.20B

Intel competes for the same server and PC sockets with its data-center CPUs, integrated and discrete graphics, and its AI accelerator line, and is named by NVIDIA among its accelerated-computing competitors.

P/E: 20.0Score: 77Market cap: $2.70T

AWS designs its own Trainium and Inferentia chips and rents them to the same AI developers who would otherwise rent NVIDIA GPU capacity in the cloud.

华为技术有限公司 (Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.)Not tracked

Huawei's Ascend accelerators are the main alternative for Chinese data-centre customers that NVIDIA can no longer serve because of United States export restrictions.

Balance Sheet & Liquidity

Revenue

$302.97B

Trailing 12 months (through 7/26/2026)

Net Income

$192.88B

Trailing 12 months (through 7/26/2026)

Free Cash Flow

$96.68B

Total Equity

$157.29B

Total Liabilities

$49.51B

Current Ratio

4.59

Interest Coverage

426.74

Debt/EBITDA

0.29

Earnings Per Share

Revenue & Net Income

Free Cash Flow

Income Breakdown

Historical statement

Margins over time

Debt over time

How heavy the debt is

Growth grid

Growth — Revenue

Fair Value Estimation

General caseFairly Valued

Fair Value

$236.44

Current Price

$210.96

Margin of Safety

+10.8%

Fair Value Range

$153.69 - $319.20

Spread across the valuation methods used, not a statistically calibrated confidence interval.

Estimation Methods

Analyst price target:$328.72
Discounted cash flow (DCF):$129.31
Earnings multiple (P/E):$134.64
Graham growth formula:$407.21
Earnings power value (EPV):$37.87
Justified P/B:$52.98
Dividend discount (Gordon):$0.32
P/FFO, funds from operations:$81.60
Mid-cycle earnings:$57.96
Revenue multiple:$67.26
Last Earnings Surprise:+3.82%

Valuation Metrics

P/E Ratio

26.67

ROE

76.3%

P/B Ratio

22.20

P/FCF

40.03

Gross Margin

74.7%

ROIC

56.3%

Profitability Radar

Value Creation (Economic Moat)

ROIC outlier

ROIC

56.3%

WACC

16.8%

ROIC − WACC

+39.5 pp

ROIC exceeds the cost of capital — the company is creating value for shareholders.

Fundamental Analysis Criteria

Passed (20)

  • EPS shows upward trend
  • EPS CAGR 7.60%
  • Price CAGR 55.85%
  • ROIC 56.3%
  • Gross margin 74.7%
  • Debt/equity ratio
  • Operating margin 65.2%
  • Positive free cash flow
  • CapEx intensity
  • Current ratio
  • Interest coverage
  • Debt/EBITDA
  • Return on tangible assets
  • Low reliance on intangibles
  • ROE 110.1%
  • Revenue growth 5Y 66.9%
  • Earnings surprise, average 3.4%
  • PEG ratio 0.28
  • Share dilution -1.2%
  • Net margin trend 63.7% vs 52.4%

Failed (6)

  • P/FCF 40.03
  • P/B ratio 22.20
  • Price below Graham Number
  • DCF valuation (Overvalued)
  • Earnings quality (operating cash flow / net income) 0.70
  • Piotroski F-Score 4/9

Unavailable (1)

  • Dividend payout –

Piotroski F-Score

4/9

Mixed signals: some areas need attention

ROA > 0
Operating cash flow > 0
ΔROA > 0
Cash flow > net income
Leverage ↓
Current ratio ↑
No dilution
Gross margin ↑
Asset turnover ↑

Earnings Quality

0.70

Moderate: some gap between profits and cash

Share Dilution

-1.2%

Buying back shares. Shareholder friendly

Institutional Holdings

Governance

Executive Team

NameTitleAge
Mr. Jen-Hsun HuangCo-Founder, CEO & Director62
Ms. Colette M. KressExecutive VP & CFO58
Ms. Debora ShoquistExecutive Vice President of Operations70
Mr. Timothy S. Teter J.D.Executive VP, General Counsel & Secretary58
Mr. Chris A. MalachowskyCo-Founder-
Mr. Scott C. GawelChief Accounting Officer54
Prof. William J. Dally Ph.D.Chief Scientist & Senior VP of Research64
Mr. Toshiya HariVice President of Investor Relations & Strategic Finance-
Ms. Mylene MangalindanVice President of Corporate Communications-
Ms. Alison Berkley WagonfeldChief Marketing Officer54

Audit Risk

5

Board Risk

10

Compensation Risk

4

Shareholder Rights Risk

6

Documents

  • Annual Report (10-K)

    A yearly overview of the business, its financial results, and the risks it faces.

    Filed on 2026-02-25

    View document
  • Quarterly Report (10-Q)

    A snapshot of financial performance for the most recent three-month period.

    Filed on 2026-08-26

    View document
  • Current Report (8-K)

    An announcement of a major event, such as a leadership change or big news.

    Filed on 2026-09-03

    View document

via SEC EDGAR

Income History

via SEC EDGAR

Part 2 · The price and its context

This part shows how the price has behaved, not whether the company is worth owning. Inside: technical analysis, potential, historical drawdowns, gamma exposure.

Market Reaction Profile

How much NVDA moves, measured on its daily prices.

VolatilityMedium

More volatile than 51% of the tracked stocks (90-day volatility).

Volatility 30d
28.9%
Volatility 90d
36.6%
Beta vs S&P 500 (1y)
1.93Correlation 0.65
Max drawdown (12m)
-20.2%
ATR (14d, % of price)
2.86%

Earnings reactions

How NVDA moved around its past quarterly results.

Next earnings release

Nov 17, 2026 · In 24 days · Time not known

EPS estimate: 2.47Revenue estimate: $109.0B

What usually happens

  • Over the last 12 releases the stock moved a median of 4.4% the next day, up or down.
  • Next-day moves: up 5, down 7 (out of 12).

Release history

DateWhen EPS est.EPS actualSurprise Gap 1 day5 days
Aug 26, 2026After the close1.791.87+4.3% +6.3% +8.7% +7.0%
May 20, 2026After the close1.561.62+3.6% -0.5% -1.8% -4.1%
Feb 25, 2026After the close1.271.30+2.0% -0.7% -5.5% -6.4%
Nov 19, 2025After the closen/an/an/a+5.1% -3.2% -3.4%
Aug 27, 2025After the closen/an/an/a-0.4% -0.8% -5.5%
May 28, 2025After the closen/an/an/a+5.5% +3.2% +5.3%
Feb 26, 2025After the closen/an/an/a+2.8% -8.5% -10.6%
Nov 20, 2024After the closen/an/an/a+2.4% +0.5% -7.2%
Aug 28, 2024After the closen/an/an/a-3.4% -6.4% -14.6%
May 22, 2024After the closen/an/an/a+7.5% +9.3% +16.4%
Feb 21, 2024After the closen/an/an/a+11.2% +16.4% +15.1%
Nov 21, 2023After the closen/an/an/a-0.2% -2.5% -3.6%

Release dates from SEC 8-K filings.

Updated 10/24/2026

Historical statistics for educational purposes only. They are not forecasts and not investment advice.

Price reaction to the news

Latest news on NVDA and what the price did next.

Return of the stock minus return of SPY over the same days. A news item close to a price move did not necessarily cause it. Historical data for educational purposes only, not investment advice.

Latest News

Recent headlines for NVDA.

  • 1d agoNEUTRAL
    Can Nvidia’s stock become a safe haven as Wall Street rethinks the AI trade?

    Nvidia's stock is being re-evaluated by Wall Street as a potential safe haven within the AI trade, shifting from earlier preferences for more volatile plays. Analysts suggest that Nvidia's established dependability and consistent performance in the AI sector might now offer a more stable investment proposition. This sentiment shift could attract investors seeking less risk, potentially stabilizing or increasing demand for its shares, even as the broader AI market evolves. The company's role in AI infrastructure remains critical, making its stock a focal point for strategic portfolio adjustments.

  • 1d agoNEGATIVE
    Perché le azioni Nvidia sono in rosso oggi: crescita vs avvertimento ribassista

    Nvidia shares experienced a decline, falling 0.2% on Friday and 4.4% in the prior session. This movement reflects investor uncertainty stemming from mixed long-term outlooks. Seaport Research Partners maintained a bearish stance, citing competitive pressures and financial commitments, setting a 'Sell' rating with a $180 price target. Despite this, Nancy Tengler, CEO of Laffer Tengler Investments, believes Nvidia could still double in value over the next five to ten years, even with slower earnings growth. The immediate outlook suggests short-term record sales, but the analyst downgrade introduces a bearish sentiment.

  • 2d agoNEGATIVE
    Perché le azioni Nvidia sono scese di oltre il 4% giovedì?

    Nvidia shares plummeted over 4% on Thursday, leading a broader sell-off in semiconductor stocks. Investors are increasingly concerned about the substantial funding required to sustain the artificial intelligence boom. This downturn extended to the tech sector, with the Nasdaq Composite falling 2.5%, the S&P 500 down 1.4%, and the Dow Jones Industrial Average showing a 0.2% loss. The Philadelphia Semiconductor Index plunged over 6%, highlighting growing unease regarding the costs, capacity constraints, and potential returns associated with AI investments. The market weakness was exacerbated by a sharp rise in oil prices, adding another layer of uncertainty for investors.

  • 3d agoPOSITIVE
    Perché le azioni Nvidia salgono mercoledì?

    Nvidia shares rose 2.44% on Wednesday following the unveiling of a new reference design aimed at accelerating AI data center construction. This innovation seeks to overcome infrastructure constraints that have hampered compute capacity expansion. The stock's advance occurred amid a broader recovery for chip manufacturers after last week's weakness. The Nasdaq Composite, a tech-heavy index, gained over 1%, reflecting positive sentiment across the sector. Nvidia's modular design for AI factories, presented by CEO Jensen Huang, is a strategic move to solidify its market position in the rapidly growing AI infrastructure space.

  • 4d agoPOSITIVE
    Perché le azioni Nvidia, AMD e Intel balzano fino al 2% nel pre-market

    Nvidia shares surged in pre-market trading, gaining over 1.5% initially, following strong preliminary results from Super Micro Computer and SpaceX. These updates signal sustained robust spending on AI infrastructure, a key driver for semiconductor companies. AMD and Intel also saw significant gains, with Intel climbing over 3% at one point. This positive momentum comes after a recent sell-off in the semiconductor sector, suggesting renewed investor confidence in AI-related hardware. Super Micro Computer's raised revenue guidance for its fiscal first quarter, projecting $18.5 billion–$19.5 billion, up from $14.5 billion–$15.5 billion, underscores the strong demand.

  • 4d agoNEUTRAL
    In the battle for AI supremacy, China is only six months behind the U.S — but that means they’re winning, says former Google CEO

    Former Google CEO Eric Schmidt suggests China is only six months behind the U.S. in the AI race, framing this as a potential win for China. He emphasizes that AI represents genuine growth, not a speculative bubble, with real customers willing to pay for valuable applications. This perspective highlights the intense global competition in AI development and commercialization. While the statement implies a narrowing gap, it doesn't provide specific financial data or forecasts for any single company, making its direct impact on NVIDIA's stock uncertain without further context on market share or revenue implications.

  • 5d agoNEGATIVE
    Nvidia, AMD e Intel crollano di nuovo in pre-market: cosa è andato storto?

    Nvidia, AMD, and Intel shares are facing renewed pre-market pressure, potentially reversing a brief semiconductor rally. This downturn follows significant selling in Asian chip stocks and a rise in Brent crude oil prices. Investors are questioning the profitability of AI investments, specifically whether clients can generate sufficient returns to justify the substantial computing power required. The Nasdaq 100 futures dipped, indicating a cautious sentiment despite recent gains in the Nasdaq Composite and the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index. This suggests ongoing investor uncertainty about the long-term value proposition of AI hardware investments.

  • 5d agoPOSITIVE
    ByteDance, Alibaba e Tencent ordinano oltre $35 mld di chip Nvidia, secondo Reuters

    Chinese tech giants ByteDance, Alibaba, and Tencent have placed orders for over 3 million Nvidia RTX PRO 5500 graphics cards, potentially exceeding $35 billion. This significant procurement highlights robust demand for Nvidia's hardware in China, despite US export restrictions on advanced AI semiconductors. The orders underscore Nvidia's critical role in supplying the necessary computing power for AI development. However, Nvidia has cautioned that demand significantly outstrips its planned production, indicating potential supply constraints and continued strong pricing power for the chipmaker.

  • 5d agoPOSITIVE
    Morgan Stanley’s favorite AI stock is 92% exposed to the $1.6 trillion build-out it’s bullish on

    Morgan Stanley has identified Nvidia Corporation as its top pick within the artificial intelligence sector, citing a favorable risk/reward profile. The bank's analysis highlights Nvidia's significant exposure, estimated at 92%, to the burgeoning $1.6 trillion AI infrastructure build-out. This strategic positioning suggests Nvidia is poised to be a primary beneficiary of the ongoing capital cycle in AI development. Investors should note that while the outlook is positive, the bank's own reports caution about the cyclical nature of capital investments, implying potential volatility.